Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Air Force Act, 1950

14 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

JOSEPH SHINEversusUNION OF INDIA

2023 INSC 8731 January 2023Disposed off

The Union of India filed a miscellaneous application seeking clarification of the Supreme Court’s decision in Joseph Shine v. Union of India, which struck down Section 497 of the IPC, asking whether the judgment also affects the applicability of Sections 45, 63 of the Army Act, 1950 and analogous provisions in the Air

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusDEVJEE MISHRA

2016 INSC 91827 September 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Corporal in the Indian Air Force, overstayed his leave and was charged under Sections 39(a) and 39(b) of the Air Force Act, 1950. He pleaded guilty before a District Court Martial, was sentenced to three months’ rigorous imprisonment and dismissed from service, and his remission application under Sect

S.P. PANDEYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2024 INSC 80421 October 2024Disposed off

The appellant, an Air Force airman, was admonished in May 2010 for allegedly overtaking vehicles at a railway crossing and using insubordinate language toward a Squadron Leader. Although the commanding officer initially expunged the punishment, the matter was reopened, leading to a second admonition in January 2011. Th

RAM NARAYAN TIWARIversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS

2011 INSC 14221 February 2011Dismissed

The appellant, a Corporal in the Indian Air Force, was convicted by a District Court‑Martial of sexual abuse of a nine‑year‑old and sentenced to three months' detention and reduction in rank. The Confirming Authority upheld the conviction but commuted the detention to dismissal from service. The appellant contended tha

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusR. KARTHIK

2020 INSC 6221 January 2020Dismissed

The sailor R. Karthik was dismissed from the Indian Navy under Section 45(a) of the Navy Act after a superior officer complained that Karthik had struck him during an incident at sea. The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) set aside the dismissal, deeming it disproportionate, and substituted it with a 75‑day detention and los

SAMRENDRA BEURAversusU.O.I. & OTHERS

2013 INSC 35020 May 2013Disposed off

The petitioner, a Mechanical Transport Driver in the Indian Air Force, was convicted by a district court‑martial of unauthorized absence under Section 39(a) of the Air Force Act, 1950 and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment, dismissal from service and reduction in rank. He had been in custody since 1 Febru

LT. COL. VIJAYNATH JHAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 54018 May 2018Dismissed

Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha, a commissioned officer of the Indian Army, was seconded to the Directorate General of Quality Assurance (DGQA) for two years. After the tenure he applied for permanent secondment, but the Quality Assurance Selection Board (QASB) found him unfit and the Ministry of Defence rejected his complaint.

UNION OF INDIA & ORSversusAIR COMMODORE NK SHARMA (17038) ADM/LGL

2023 INSC 107414 December 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Air Commodore N.K. Sharma, a Judge Advocate General (Air) in the Indian Air Force, claimed that the Ministry of Defence failed to form a policy for filling the upgraded AVM JAG (Air) post and that his promotion was unjustly denied. He filed a complaint under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, which led the Armed Forces T

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusMAJOR GENERAL SHRI KANT SHARMA & ANR.

2015 INSC 20611 March 2015Disposed off

The case concerned several writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging orders of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT). The Union of India argued that Sections 30 and 31 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, together with Articles 136(2) and 227(4) of the Constitution, bar High Court jurisdiction

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusEX LAC NALLAM SHIVA

2017 INSC 73210 August 2017Case Partly allowed

Corporal Nallam Shiva of the Indian Air Force overstayed his casual leave of about one and a half years without informing his superiors, leading to his conviction for desertion and overstaying leave under the Air Force Act, 1950. The District Court Martial sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment, dismissal from service

EX. LAC YOGESH PATHANIAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 338 January 2019Dismissed

LAC Yogesh Pathania was tried by a District Court Martial (DCM) for insubordinate language, use of criminal force and conduct prejudicial to good order under the Air Force Act, 1950, and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment and dismissal. The Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) upheld the DCM's findings and dismissed his app

SQN. LDR. (RETD.) NAVTEJ SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2018 INSC 11575 December 2018Appeal(s) allowed

Squadron Leader Navtej Singh, an Indian Air Force officer, applied for permission to marry a Canadian immigrant in 2008 but contracted the marriage without waiting for the required approval. He was later invalidated from service on medical grounds in November 2009. After his retirement, he sought to have his wife and d

AMIT KUMAR ROYversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2019 INSC 7203 July 2019Disposed off

Amit Kumar Roy, an Air Force airman, applied for a bank probationary officer post without completing the mandatory seven years of service or obtaining prior permission under Air Force Order (AFO) 14/2008. He obtained a provisional No Objection Certificate (NOC) and discharge from the Armed Forces Tribunal, joined the b

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search