Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
23 judgments · newest first · showing 1–23
The petitioners, three agriculturists from Pune district, challenged the Maharashtra government's decision to site a new greenfield international airport at "Site 1A" in Purandar and the accompanying land acquisition of about 1,216.75 hectares under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. …
The petitioner, heir of the late Edward Machado, sought a review of the Bombay High Court's order dated 11 March 2015 that dismissed his writ petition challenging the deletion of his name from revenue records for 28.52 acres of land in Village Bapnala, claimed to be in his possession since 1944. The …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The appellants, former Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, challenged eviction orders issued by the Eviction Officer under Section 28‑B of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. They argued that the eviction violated the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) filed by Air India employees challenging eviction orders issued by the Eviction Officer under Section 28‑B of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The appellants, many belonging to SC/ST communities, argued that the …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) filed by Air India employees challenging eviction orders issued by the Eviction Officer under Section 28‑B of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The appellants, many belonging to SC/ST communities, argued that the …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Bombay High Court heard a group of appeals (First Appeal No. 631 of 2025) under Section 28‑K of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, challenging eviction orders issued under Section 28‑B against Air India employees residing in the Old Air India Housing Colony, Kalina. The appellants argued …
The Central GST Delhi‑III (the revenue) appealed against Delhi International Airport Ltd., contending that the User Development Fee (UDF) collected from passengers under Section 22A of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, was a taxable service liable to service tax. The Court examined the …
The Airport Authority of India (AAI) issued Request for Proposals for ground handling services at various airport groups, setting eligibility criteria that included regional clustering, a 36‑month experience requirement for scheduled flights, and a minimum annual turnover of Rs 30 crore (later …
The Supreme Court examined appeals by Delhi International Airport Ltd. (DIAL) and Mumbai International Airport Ltd. (MIAL) challenging tariff determinations made by the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India (AERA) under the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority of India Act, 2008. The key …
Mihan India Ltd (MIL) invited global tenders for the up‑gradation, modernisation, operation and maintenance of Nagpur Airport. GMR Airports Ltd (GAL) emerged as the highest bidder after negotiating a higher revenue‑share and MIL issued a letter dated 07‑03‑2019 accepting the revised proposal, which …
The case concerned 136 contract workers who had been employed as trolley retrievers at Delhi airports and sought regularisation after the Central Government’s 2004 notification under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 (CLRAA) prohibited such contract labour in the Airports …
The Supreme Court examined whether Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL) and Mumbai International Airport Ltd (MIAL) could levy development fees on embarking passengers under Section 22A of the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994, based on letters of approval from the Central Government. The …
The appellant, Sparkway Enterprises, held a licence from the Airports Authority of India (AAI) to collect airport admission ticket charges at Karipur Airport and paid a monthly licence fee to AAI. The Central Board of Excise and Customs issued a show‑cause notice demanding service tax and education …
Golden Chariot Airport held a licence to operate a restaurant at Mumbai Airport, which was initially for three years and later extended twice. The licence holder claimed the licence was irrevocable based on alleged oral assurances and sought to prevent eviction after the licence expired. The Supreme …
The Airport Authority of India (AAI) leased the Mumbai airport to Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. (appellant), excluding a 31,000 sq.m. parcel pending a suit by Regency Convention Centre & Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (first respondent) for specific performance of an agreement with AAI. The appellant …
The Supreme Court examined whether land and buildings owned by the International Airport Authority of India (IAAI), leased to the Indian Tourism Development Corporation (ITDC) for a hotel, were exempt from municipal property tax under Article 285(1) of the Constitution. The Court held that the IAAI …
