THE SECRETARY, ALL INDIA SHRI SHIVAJI MEMORIAL SOCIETY (AISSMS) AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2025 INSC 42231 March 2025Disposed off
The All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society (AISSMS) appealed against Bombay High Court orders that granted certain private engineering teachers a higher pay band and redesignation as Associate Professors. The teachers, appointed between 1995 and 2009, held only Master's degrees and, except for one, failed to obtain a …
PRAMODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS.
2015 INSC 94829 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a senior lecturer in a private polytechnic, claimed that the vacant post of Principal must be filled by promotion under Rule 3(3) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981. The Director of Technical Education rejected this claim, applying the Government Polytechn…
THE JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY REGISTRARversusSANGAM LAXMI BAI VIDYAPEET & ORS.
2018 INSC 101129 October 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University declined a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to Sangam Laxmi Bai Vidyapeeth’s request to start a D.Pharmacy course, citing the State Government’s policy and a survey under Section 20 of the Telangana Education Act, 1982 showing an oversupply of pharmacy colleges in H…
RUNGTA ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BHILAI & ANOTHERversusCHHATTISGARH SWAMI VIVEKANAND TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY & ANOTHER
2014 INSC 68425 September 2014Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a writ petition filed by Rungta Engineering College, Bhilai and the Secretary of the GDR Educational Society challenging the Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University's refusal to grant affiliation. The University had declined affiliation on several grounds, but the All India Council…
ASSOCIATION OF MANAGEMENT OF PRIVATE COLLEGES,versusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION & ORS.
2013 INSC 27825 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Association of Management of Private Colleges, whose members are colleges affiliated to Bharathidasan University and Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, filed writ petitions seeking to bar the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) from exercising jurisdiction over their MBA and MCA programmes. The High C…
GELUS RAM SAHU AND OTHERSversusDR. SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS
2020 INSC 20218 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the promotion of seven teachers to the post of Principal in Chhattisgarh polytechnic colleges. Respondent No.1, a senior HOD, claimed that a Ph.D. was an essential qualification for the post under the 2010 AICTE Regulations and sought to quash the promotions, relying on a 2016 AICTE Notification that…
VISVESWARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY AND ANR.versusKRISHNENDU HALDER AND ORS.
2011 INSC 13418 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the eligibility criteria for engineering admissions prescribed by the Visvesvaraya Technological University and the Karnataka State, which were higher than the minimum standards set by AICTE, could be relaxed when a large number of seats remained vacant. The petitioners, two students …
VARUN SAINI & ORS.versusGURU GOBI ND SINGH INDRAPRASHTHA UNIVERSITY
2014 INSC 72616 October 2014Disposed off
The petitioners sought an extension of the time schedule for online counselling and admission to technical courses of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, arguing that many seats remained vacant and AICTE had not adhered to its prescribed timetable. The University had issued a notification for supplementary couns…
PARSHAVANATH CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS.versusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDU & ORS.
2012 INSC 59113 December 2012Dismissed
The Parshavanath Charitable Trust ran an engineering college that shifted to a new site in May 2008 without obtaining the No‑Objection Certificate or prior approval required under Clause 9.22 of the AICTE Handbook. Although AICTE later granted approval for the 2008‑09 and 2009‑10 academic years, the approvals expressly…
INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (INDIA) THROUGH ITS CHAIRMANversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
2019 INSC 89413 August 2019Rejected
The Institution of Mechanical Engineers (India) (IME) conducts bi‑annual examinations and awards a Certificate of Membership (AMIE). Historically, the Government of India recognised this certificate as equivalent to a degree or diploma for Central Government recruitment, but the High Court held it was not equivalent to…
G H APJ ABDUL KALAM TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY & ANR.versusJAI BHARATH COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & ORS.
2020 INSC 69510 December 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Syndicate of APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University could prescribe norms for granting affiliation to additional courses under Section 30(2) of the University Act, even though the university statutes were not yet in force. The Court held that the power to lay down such norms flo…
COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATIONversusSHRI PRINCE SHIVAJI MARATHA BOARDING HOUSE’S COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE & ORS.
2019 INSC 12248 November 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a series of appeals concerning the conflict between the Architects Act, 1972 and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) Act, 1987 over who has the final authority to approve and monitor architectural education institutions. The Court held that the 1972 Act, which specifically d…
THE PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIAversusDR. S.K. TOSHNIWAL EDUCATIONAL TRUSTS VIDARBHA INSTITUTE OF PHARMACY AND ORS. ETC.
2020 INSC 2765 March 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a batch of petitions challenging the approval of increased intake and second‑shift courses in pharmacy colleges approved by AICTE but rejected by the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI). The core issue was whether the Pharmacy Act, 1948 (a special statute) or the All India Council for Technical E…
ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD.versusRABI SANKAR PATRO & ORS.
2017 INSC 10753 November 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether deemed‑to‑be universities could award engineering degrees through open‑distance learning without the approval of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). It held that AICTE is the exclusive authority to lay down norms for technical education and that the Distance Educati…