Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987

21 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

PRAMODversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA& ORS.

2015 INSC 94829 December 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a senior lecturer in a private polytechnic, claimed that the vacant post of Principal must be filled by promotion under Rule 3(3) of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981. The Director of Technical Education rejected this claim, applying the Government Polytechn

BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY AND ANR.versusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION AND ORS.

2001 INSC 45424 September 2001Appeal(s) allowed

Bharathidasan University, a full‑fledged university recognised under the UGC Act, began offering several technology programmes without obtaining prior approval from the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). AICTE filed a writ petition seeking to restrain the university from running those courses, arguing t

P. KASILINGAM AND ORS.versusP.S.G. COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ORS.

1995 INSC 21124 March 1995Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals by teaching staff of P.S.G. College of Technology challenging a Madras High Court decision that the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976 and its Rules did not apply to the college. The college, a private engineering institution, had resolved that the Act and Rules were

GOVT. OF A.P. AND ANR.versusJ.B. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ANR. ETC.

2005 INSC 9923 February 2005Appeal(s) allowed

Private educational societies sought to establish engineering colleges in Andhra Pradesh. They obtained approval from the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) but were denied permission under Section 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 because the State deemed the local area already saturated. The

GELUS RAM SAHU AND OTHERSversusDR. SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH AND OTHERS

2020 INSC 20218 February 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the promotion of seven teachers to the post of Principal in Chhattisgarh polytechnic colleges. Respondent No.1, a senior HOD, claimed that a Ph.D. was an essential qualification for the post under the 2010 AICTE Regulations and sought to quash the promotions, relying on a 2016 AICTE Notification that

VISVESWARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY AND ANR.versusKRISHNENDU HALDER AND ORS.

2011 INSC 13418 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the eligibility criteria for engineering admissions prescribed by the Visvesvaraya Technological University and the Karnataka State, which were higher than the minimum standards set by AICTE, could be relaxed when a large number of seats remained vacant. The petitioners, two students

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATIONversusSURINDER KUMAR DHAWAN & ORS .

2009 INSC 21718 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) challenged several Delhi High Court orders that permitted diploma holders with only 10+1 qualifications to enroll in a one‑year bridge course leading to a B.Tech degree. AICTE argued that allowing such bridge courses constituted a major policy shift, diluted the ent

VARUN SAINI & ORS.versusGURU GOBI ND SINGH INDRAPRASHTHA UNIVERSITY

2014 INSC 72616 October 2014Disposed off

The petitioners sought an extension of the time schedule for online counselling and admission to technical courses of Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, arguing that many seats remained vacant and AICTE had not adhered to its prescribed timetable. The University had issued a notification for supplementary couns

PARSHAVANATH CHARITABLE TRUST & ORS.versusALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECH. EDU & ORS.

2012 INSC 59113 December 2012Dismissed

The Parshavanath Charitable Trust ran an engineering college that shifted to a new site in May 2008 without obtaining the No‑Objection Certificate or prior approval required under Clause 9.22 of the AICTE Handbook. Although AICTE later granted approval for the 2008‑09 and 2009‑10 academic years, the approvals expressly

JAYA GOKUL EDUCATIONAL TRUSTversusTHE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA STATE AND ANR.

2000 INSC 21411 April 2000Directions issued

The Jaya Gokul Educational Trust applied to the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) and Mahatma Gandhi University for permission to establish a self‑financing engineering college. AICTE granted conditional approval after inspections and consultations, and the university listed the college for affiliation.

UNNI KRISHNAN, J.P. AND ORS. ETC. IRRCversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1993 INSC 404 February 1993Disposed off

The Supreme Court held that the right to education is a fundamental right flowing from Article 21, but it is limited to free education up to the age of fourteen and thereafter subject to the State’s economic capacity. The Court rejected the notion of a fundamental right to establish or obtain recognition for educationa

ORISSA LIFT IRRIGATION CORP. LTD.versusRABI SANKAR PATRO & ORS.

2017 INSC 10753 November 2017Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether deemed‑to‑be universities could award engineering degrees through open‑distance learning without the approval of the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). It held that AICTE is the exclusive authority to lay down norms for technical education and that the Distance Educati

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search