Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

All India Services Act, 1951

33 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

R.R.S. CHOUHAN AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 22428 March 1995Dismissed

The appellants, former forest officers, were appointed to temporary Officer on Special Duty (O.S.D.) posts in the State Forest Service after senior posts in the Indian Forest Service were abolished. They served in these O.S.D. posts from 1977 to 1985 and were later appointed to the Indian Forest Service in 1985 with a

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusR.D. SHARMA AND ANR.

2022 INSC 10127 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed

The retired Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) of Madhya Pradesh, who retired in 2001, sought a higher pension by invoking the Indian Forests Service (Pay) Second Amendment Rules, 2008 which created an apex scale of Rs.80,000 for the upgraded post of Head of Forest Force. The Central Administrative Tribunal

ZAKIR ABDUL MIRAJKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.

2022 INSC 85524 August 2022Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra alleged that the appellants were members of an organized crime syndicate operating the illegal "Mumbai Matka" gambling network. Police raided a gambling den, recorded confessions of several accused, including the appellants, by an Additional Superintendent of Police (Addl. SP) under Section 18

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusM. SELVAKUMAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 7224 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed

The appeals challenged High Court orders that had granted physically‑handicapped candidates belonging to the OBC category three additional attempts in the Civil Services Examination, on the ground that the Government’s policy of increasing attempts for physically‑handicapped candidates of the General category from four

UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHERversusHEMRAJ SINGH CHAUHAN & OTHERS

2010 INSC 16523 March 2010Disposed off

The respondents, officers of the Uttar Pradesh State Civil Service, claimed that the quinquennial cadre review of the IAS for Uttar Pradesh was due in April 2003 and that the review conducted in August 2005 should be given retrospective effect so that they could be considered for promotion. The Union of India and the C

GUDUR KISHAN RAO AND ORS.versusSUTIRTHA BHATTACHARYA AND ORS.

1998 INSC 11023 February 1998Dismissed

The appellants, former Deputy Collectors of the Andhra Pradesh State Civil Service, were excluded from the 1987 IAS promotion list and obtained a Tribunal order directing the creation of 14 supernumerary IAS posts. The Government of India issued notifications on 15‑12‑1993 (amending the Cadre Strength Regulation) and 1

UNION OF INDIA AND ANRversusMS. A. SHAINAMOL, IAS AND ANR

2021 INSC 66122 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed

Ms. A. Shainamol, an OBC candidate who qualified on general merit in the 2006 Civil Services Examination, was allocated to the Himachal Pradesh IAS cadre after the state's consent. She challenged the allocation, seeking placement in the Maharashtra cadre on the basis of higher merit than another candidate, and later th

IN RE: PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL REPORTS OF THE OFFICERS OF THE INDIAN FOREST SERVICE versus

2025 INSC 74821 May 2025

The Supreme Court examined a Government Order dated 29 June 2024 issued by the Madhya Pradesh Government that made District Collectors and Divisional Commissioners – officers of the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) – the reporting, reviewing and accepting authorities for Performance Appraisal Reports (PAR) of Indian

SYED KHALID RIZVI AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1992 INSC 32020 November 1992Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the inter‑se seniority of direct‑recruit Indian Police Service (IPS) officers and promotee officers from the Uttar Pradesh State Police Service who had been temporarily appointed to cadre posts. The promotees claimed that their continuous officiation from the date of their promotion should be counted

STATE OF HARYANAversusDR. A.K. SINHA

1997 INSC 17320 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. A.K. Sinha, an IAS officer allotted to the Haryana cadre, obtained a Ph.D. in 1979 and sought four advance increments under Rule 2(b) of the All India Services (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1960. The Haryana State Government denied the request, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court directed the State to grant the in

B. AMRUTHA LAKSHMIversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

2013 INSC 70218 October 2013Case Partly allowed

B. Amrutha Lakshmi, an Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax in Andhra Pradesh, filed a petition challenging the State Government's refusal to forward her name for selection to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) under the IAS (Appointment by Selection) Regulations, 1997. Although she satisfied all statutory criteria

STATE OF HARYANAversusSHRI P.C. WADHWA, IPS INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE & ANR.

1987 INSC 11416 April 1987Dismissed

The case concerned whether the Home Secretary of Haryana could act as the reporting authority for the Inspector General of Police (IGP) under the All‑India Services (Confidential Rolls) Rules, 1970. The respondent, IGP P.C. Wadhwa, challenged a confidential report and adverse remarks prepared by the Home Secretary, whi

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusJAWAHAR SANTHKUMAR AND OTHERS

2019 INSC 125315 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the promotion of Jawahar Santkhumar to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) for the 2004 selection year. A Selection Committee, under the IAS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, classified him as "Good" and did not include him in the Select List because only three vacancies existed and

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusBADRINATH & ORS.

1987 INSC 28315 October 1987Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a senior IAS officer, Badrinath, who delivered a speech criticizing the Red Fort time‑capsule and later sought to sue the Chief Secretary for defamation. He applied for permission under Rule 17 of the All India Services (Conduct) Rules, 1968, which bars civil servants from suing for vindication of an

ALL INDIA JUDGES' ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA

1991 INSC 29013 November 1991Disposed off

The All India Judges' Association filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking directions for the creation of an All‑India Judicial Service and uniform service conditions for the subordinate judiciary, including retirement age, pay, accommodation, transport, library and in‑service training. The Court examined the con

MOHAN KUMAR SINGHANIA AND ORS. ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC

1991 INSC 23313 September 1991Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the second proviso added to Rule 4 and the proviso to Rule 17 of the Civil Services Examination Rules, which restrict candidates allocated to IPS or Central Services Group A from re‑appearing in the next examination unless they resign. The petitioners argued tha

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONversusM. SATHIYA PRIYA AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 33513 April 2018Appeal(s) allowed

The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) appealed against the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and the Madras High Court, which had ordered the appointment of M. Sathyia Priya to the Indian Police Service (IPS) by directing that her Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) from 2003‑2008 be considered. The Supreme Cou

THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.versusELEPHANT G. RAJENDRAN & ORS. ETC.

2019 INSC 52312 April 2019Case Partly allowed

The Tamil Nadu government, after receiving a complaint from the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Commissioner, ordered on 01.08.2018 that all idol‑theft investigations being handled by the Idol Wing of the CID be transferred to the CBI. The Madras High Court quashed that order and, under Article 226, appointed

R.S DASS ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1986 INSC 26611 December 1986Dismissed

Three officers of the Punjab State Civil Service claimed that they were superseded in the 1978, 1979, 1980 and 1983 IAS promotion Select Lists because junior officers were included while they were omitted, and that the Selection Committee failed to record reasons for supersession, violating Articles 14 and 16 and princ

SATYA NARAIN SHUKLAversusUNION OF LNDIA & ORS.

2006 INSC 31411 May 2006Disposed off

Satya Narain Shukla, an IAS officer of the Uttar Pradesh cadre, challenged his non‑empanelment as Additional Secretary to the Government of India, contending that the Central Staffing Scheme (CSS) was unconstitutional, that its provisions were ultra vires Articles 309 and 312 of the Constitution, that the post constitu

HARJEET SINGH ETCversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1980 INSC 7711 April 1980Disposed off

B.R. Kapur and Harjeet Singh, directly recruited into the Punjab Police Service in 1951, were promoted to the Indian Police Service (IPS) in 1969. The dispute centered on the assignment of their "year of allotment" and seniority under Rule 3(3)(b) of the IPS (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1954, specifically whether c

R. R. VERMA AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1980 INSC 7811 April 1980Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by R. R. Verma and other direct recruits against the Union of India challenging the Delhi High Court’s dismissal of their writ petition as infructuous and the grant of a certificate of fitness under Article 133. The petitioners argued that Rule 3 of the All India Services (Conditi

AMRIK SINGH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1980 INSC 7911 April 1980Dismissed

The case concerned V.K. Ahluwalia, a former Deputy Superintendent of Police who had been appointed Superintendent of Police (a cadre post) before being inducted into the Indian Police Service (IPS). He claimed that his year of allotment in the IPS should be fixed as 1961, reflecting his continuous officiation in a cadr

SRI K. PRASAD & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1987 INSC 37010 December 1987Case Partly allowed

The case concerned seniority disputes between initial recruits (direct recruits under rule 4(2)) and officers recruited later through the Special Selection Board (SSB) under the initial recruitment provisions of the IFS Recruitment Rules. The Court examined whether the SSB must consider all eligible State Forest Servic

THE STATE OF WEST BENGALversusMR. MONOTOSH ROY AND ANR.

1998 INSC 4699 December 1998Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former Chief Metropolitan Magistrate who retired in February 1981, sought to have his pension recalculated under the 1987 amendment to the All India Services (Death‑cum‑Retirement Benefits) Rules, which provided a higher pension to retirees after 1 January 1986. The High Court initially dismissed his

DIVYAversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2023 INSC 9009 October 2023Dismissed

The petitioners, including Ms. Divya, applied for the 2022 Civil Services Examination (CSE) claiming reservation under the Economically Weaker Section (EWS) category but were rejected by the UPSC because they did not possess the required Income & Asset Certificate (I&AC) for FY 2020‑21 before the prescribed cut‑off dat

ASHOK KUMAR SAHUversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2006 INSC 5018 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed

Ashok Kumar Sahu, an IPS officer on suspension after completing 20 years of service, applied for voluntary retirement under Rule 16(2A) of the All India Services (Death‑cum‑Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958. The Central Government referred the matter to the Joint Cadre Authority, which approved the retirement, and a not

S. RAMANATHANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2000 INSC 5797 December 2000Disposed off

The appellants, State Police Service officers promoted to the Indian Police Service (IPS), claimed that the Central Government failed to carry out the triennial review of IPS cadre strength required by Rule 4(2) of the IPS Cadre Rules, 1954. The review, due in 1987, was only initiated in 1989 and completed in 1991, cau

R. VISHWANATHA PILLAIversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 237 January 2004

R. Vishwanatha Pillai was appointed to posts reserved for Scheduled Castes on the basis of a caste certificate that was later found to be false. An anthropological enquiry and a Scrutiny Committee confirmed that he did not belong to a Scheduled Caste, leading to the cancellation of his appointment. The Supreme Court he

P.C. WADHWAversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS

1981 INSC 545 March 1981Appeal(s) allowed

P.C. Wadhwa, an IPS officer, was deputed to the Haryana State Electricity Board as a Vigilance Officer. The Governor's order protected his pay but did not mention a deputation allowance. Wadhwa claimed entitlement to such allowance under Rule 2(b) of the All India Services (Conditions of Service‑Residuary Matters) Rule

MARKANDEY SINGH, I.P.S., & ORS.versusM.L. BRANOT, I.P.S., & ORS.

1988 INSC 1344 May 1988Dismissed

Markandey Singh, a former Deputy Superintendent of Police in Uttar Pradesh, was absorbed into the Himachal Pradesh‑Delhi joint IPS cadre in 1963 and was allotted the year 1958 as his year of allotment. He later claimed that his officiation as Superintendent of Police while on deputation from 6 December 1961 to 13 May 1

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusDUDH NATH PRASAD.

2000 INSC 14 January 2000Dismissed

Dudh Nath Prasad, an IAS officer, was appointed in 1968 to a reserved Scheduled Caste (SC) vacancy based on a caste certificate issued by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Howrah, West Bengal. Although he was born, educated and held property in Bihar, his parents had been residing in Howrah for over 30 years before the 1966

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search