RAJEEV MANKOTIAversusTHE SECRETARY TO THE PRESIDENT OF INDIA AND ORS.
1997 INSC 33427 March 1997Disposed off
The petitioner, Rajeev Mankotia, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking protection of the Viceregal Lodge in Shimla as an ancient monument of national importance, opposing the Union Government's plan to convert it into a tourist hotel. The Court examined the definition of "ancient monument" and the duties of th…
DEPARTMENT OF CUSTOMSversusSHARAD GANDHI
2019 INSC 28227 February 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Department of Customs appealed against the discharge of Sharad Gandhi, who was accused of attempting to export a sand‑stone Buddha head classified as an antiquity. The prosecution relied on Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 for false declaration and fraudulent evasion of a prohibition. T…
B.P. SHARMAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2003 INSC 39918 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, professional tourist guides, held identity cards issued by the Department of Tourism that permitted them to charge visitors for guiding services. Clause 17 of the governing instructions stipulated that the identity card would not be renewed once a guide turned 60 years old, leading to the denial of rene…
VANASHAKTIversusUNION OF INDIA
2025 INSC 71816 May 2025
The petitioners challenged the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change's 2017 Notification and the 2021 Office Memorandum, which sought to grant ex post facto environmental clearances for projects that had commenced without prior clearance under the 2006 EIA Notification. The Court examined whether such retr…
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIAversusNARENDER ANAND AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 3016 January 2012Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, is a protected monument and whether the 1992 notification declaring a 100‑metre prohibited area around it applies to a plot where the respondents sought to construct a multistoried building. The Court held that the 1956 notification declaring Jantar Mantar a …
SANJAY KUMAR MANJULversusTHE CHAIRMAN, UPSC AND ORS.
2006 INSC 60813 September 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Sanjay Kumar Manjul against a High Court order that had allowed Dr. S. Rajavelu’s writ petition challenging his exclusion from the UPSC’s direct recruitment for the post of Superintending Archaeologist. The dispute centered on whether field experience in Epigraphy satisfied the…
SHIV DARSHAN SINGHversusRAKESH TIWARI, DIRECTOR GENERAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA (ASI) & ORS.
2019 INSC 7359 July 2019
The petitioners sought contempt proceedings against the Director General of the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) and other authorities, alleging that they violated the Supreme Court's order dated 16 January 2012 which barred any construction within 100 metres of the protected monument Jantar Mantar. The Court exami…
ARDHENDU KUMAR DASversusTHE STATE OF ODISHA AND ORS.
2022 INSC 6383 June 2022Dismissed
A public‑interest litigation was filed in the Orissa High Court challenging the construction of toilets, drains, electricity rooms and other amenities within the prohibited area of the Shree Jagannath Temple complex, alleging violation of the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958. The High Co…
K. GURUPRASAD RAOversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 3971 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard a public‑interest writ petition seeking the cancellation of a mining lease and a ban on mining within one kilometre of the 16th‑century Jambunatha Temple, a protected monument in Karnataka. The petition challenged mining activities that were alleged to have caused structural damage to the temple…