Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987

18 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DOKISEELA RAMULUversusSRI SANGAMESWARA SWAMY VARU & OTHERS

2016 INSC 107229 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dokiseela Ramulu, a landless cultivator, claimed that he and his ancestors had possessed a parcel of agricultural land in Sangam Agraharam village long before the 1959 notification under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948, and therefor

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.versusNALLAMILLI RAMI REDDI AND ORS.

2001 INSC 40429 August 2001Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Section 82 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, which cancels all agricultural leases of lands held by charitable or religious institutions except those of "landless poor" persons. The State of Andhra Prades

COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS AND ORS.versusVITTAL RAO AND ORS.

2004 INSC 67525 November 2004Dismissed

The case concerned 5 bighas of land donated by a Fauzdar to his ancestor for the construction of a temple. The land was held to be an absolute private gift, not an endowment, and the temple was deemed a private temple. After a long series of suits, appeals and a Supreme Court judgment confirming these findings, the Sta

K. DEVAKIMMA & ORS.versusTIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAMS & ANR.

2015 INSC 35023 April 2015Case Partly allowed

The appellants, small shop‑owners in Tirumala, challenged the compensation awarded for their land acquired by the State for the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Reference Court had fixed a market value of Rs.80‑100 per square foot based on escalation of values of adjacent l

M/S NEW NOBLE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETYversusTHE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 AND ANR.

2022 INSC 111119 October 2022Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether societies and trusts claiming exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income‑Tax Act must exist exclusively for educational purposes and not for profit. It held that “solely” means the institution’s objects must be limited to education; any surplus is permissible only if it arises

SH. A.S. NARAYANA DEEKSHJTULU ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 41119 March 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Sections 34, 35, 36, 37, 39 and 144 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, which abolished hereditary rights of archakas, mirasidars, gamekars and other temple office‑holders. The petitioners, hereditary priests, co

PANNALAL BANSILAL PITTI AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1996 INSC 8517 January 1996Disposed off

The petitioners, hereditary trustees of several Hindu charitable and religious institutions in Andhra Pradesh, challenged Sections 15, 16, 17, 29(5) and 144 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, alleging violations of Articles 14, 15, 25 and 26 of the Constitution.

KAPADAM SANGALAPPA AND OTHERSversusKAMATAM SANGALAPPA AND OTHERS

2025 INSC 130711 November 2025Dismissed

The case concerned a long‑standing dispute between two sections of the Kuruba community over the performance of rituals and custody of idols of Lord Sangalappa Swamy. A compromise decree dated 1 November 1933 required the respondents to pay half the pooja expenses, to rotate the idols every six months and to appoint tr

A.S. NARAYANA DEEKSHITULU ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5049 May 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the recommendations of a committee appointed to determine the pay scales, honoraria and classification of hereditary religious staff of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. The petitions challen

SRI DIVI KODANDARAMA SARAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5059 May 1997Disposed off

The petitioners sought review of the State Government's acceptance of a Committee's recommendations under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 concerning classification of temples, remuneration and cadre strength of Archakas, and related administrative measures. The Su

PVSSR JAGANNATHA CHARYULU AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5079 May 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the implementation of welfare measures for Archakas and other temple employees under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. It upheld the constitutional validity of the Act and held that the abolition of hereditary rights of Archakas is not un

AS. NARA YANA DEEKSHITULU ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5099 May 1997Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, particularly its provisions abolishing hereditary rights of Archakas and other temple officials. It held that such abolition was not unconstitutional and that the Act's welf

EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TTD, TIRUPATIversusA.S. NARAYAN DEEKSHITULU AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5109 May 1997Disposed off

The Executive Officer of the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) filed an application seeking recovery of excess payments made to archakas, gamekars, jeeyamgars and other mirasidars under the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987. The TTD alleged that payments totalling ap

TEKI VENKATA RATNAM AND ORS .versusDY. COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT AND ORS.

2001 INSC 3477 August 2001Dismissed

The appellants challenged a notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Endowments under Section 87 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, which sought to determine whether the Shri Panduranga Vitthal Swami temple was a public or private temple. They argued that the

PUSHPAGIRI MATHversusKOPPARAJU VEERABHADRA RAO

1996 INSC 6277 May 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Pushpagiri Math, claimed ownership of a parcel of land that had been granted as a Bhatavarthi inam to the great‑grandfather of the respondent, Kopparaju Veerabhadra Rao, for services rendered. The respondent asserted title by prescription after the Inam Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1956 ca

TIRUMALA TIRUPATL DEVASTHANAMSversusK. JOTHEESWARA PILLAI (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.

2007 INSC 5143 May 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The employees, who were former nominal muster‑roll (NMR) workers, were appointed as Attenders under a circular that gave preference to ex‑employees. Verification revealed they were over the age limit of 28 years prescribed by the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Employees Service Rules, 1989, and they were terminated. Th

A.P.N.G.O.'S ASSOCIATIONversusGOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & OTHERS

2014 INSC 2423 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The A.P.N.G.O.'S Association sought to purchase 18 acres of land owned by a Hindu temple to build houses for its members. Under s.80 of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, the government published a Gazette notice inviting objections and subsequently issued G.O.Ms. N

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search