Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

GOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.versusK. BRAHMANANDAM AND ORS.

2008 INSC 54629 April 2008Case Partly allowed

Seven teachers were appointed in a private‑management school without complying with the Andhra Pradesh Educational Institutions Rules, 1993 – no prior permission, no advertisement, and no approval of appointments. Their services were not approved and they received no salary, prompting writ petitions that the High Court

B. RAMANJINI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ANR.

2002 INSC 23626 April 2002Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the cancellation of District Selection Committee written examinations in Anantapur district after a police report detailed massive irregularities, and the subsequent fresh examinations and results. It held that the State Government was justified in cancelling the exams and that the High Court

GOVT. OF A.P. AND ANR.versusJ.B. EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ANR. ETC.

2005 INSC 9923 February 2005Appeal(s) allowed

Private educational societies sought to establish engineering colleges in Andhra Pradesh. They obtained approval from the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) but were denied permission under Section 20 of the Andhra Pradesh Education Act, 1982 because the State deemed the local area already saturated. The

CHEBROLU LEELA PRASAD RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS.

2020 INSC 34422 April 2020Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the validity of G.O. Ms. No.3/2000 issued by the erstwhile Andhra Pradesh Government, which provided 100% reservation for Scheduled Tribe candidates in teacher posts in scheduled areas. The Court held that under Paragraph 5(1) of Schedule V, the Governor may only exclude or modify an existing

NEDURIMILLI JANARDHANA REDDYversusPROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC STUDENTS UNION AND ORS.

1994 INSC 40120 September 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the Andhra Pradesh Government's grant of permission to twenty societies to establish unaided private medical and dental colleges. The Court found that the State had framed the 1992 Rules and invited applications before constituting the "competent authority" mandated by the Andhra Pradesh Educ

B. MANMAD REDDY & ORS.versusCHANDRA PRAKASH REDDY & ORS.

2010 INSC 10517 February 2010Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered appeals filed by direct recruits to the Andhra Pradesh State Educational Service challenging the constitutionality of Note 6 to Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Education Service Rules, which allocated promotion vacancies in Class II Category 1 posts on the basis of whether an officer was a dir

R. SULOCHANA DEVIversusD.M. SUJATHA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 5714 October 2004Leave Granted & Disposed off

The dispute concerned the seniority and appointment of the principal of Andhra Christian College, a minority institution, between appellant R. Sulochana Devi and respondent D.M. Sujatha. The Regional Joint Director (RJD) initially opined that another lecturer, Mr. P. Andrew, was senior, leading to his appointment as pr

SATRUCHARLA CHANDRASEKHAR RAJUversusVYRICHERLA PRADEEP KUMAR DEV AND ANR.

1992 INSC 2364 September 1992Appeal(s) allowed

Satrucharla Raju was appointed as a single teacher in a primary school run by the Integrated Tribal Development Agency (ITDA), a registered society. He was suspended pending an enquiry, tendered his resignation on 26 October 1989 (which was not accepted), and subsequently filed his nomination and was elected to the And

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search