Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LIMITEDversusM/S RAIN CALCINING LIMITED & OTHERS

2019 INSC 130029 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined three sets of appeals filed by Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. (APTRANSCO) against orders of the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (APERC) fixing wheeling charges, grid support charges, and the continuation of incentives for non‑conventional energy. The Court he

A.P. GAS POWER CORPN. LTD.versusA.P. STATE REGULATORY COMMISSION AND ANR.

2004 INSC 20323 March 2004Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether A.P. Gas Power Corporation Ltd (APGPCL), a privately‑participated captive power plant, needed a licence to supply electricity to its shareholders, their sister concerns and companies that acquired its shares. APGPCL argued that the power generated was for captive consumption and that

A.P. ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONversusM/S. R.V.K. ENERGY PVT. LTD. AND ANOTHER

2008 INSC 72216 May 2008Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the dispute between the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (APERC) and private mini‑power‑plant (MPP) developers, including Mis. R.V.K. Energy Pvt. Ltd. and LVS Power Ltd., over the Commission’s direction that all power generated by the MPPs must be sold exclusively to APTRANSCO

M/S. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A.P. LTD.versusM/S. LANCO KONDAPALLI POWER PVT. LTD.

2005 INSC 61915 December 2005Dismissed

The appellant Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. issued a show‑cause notice to the respondent Lanco Kondapalli Power Pvt. Ltd. seeking to re‑fix the capacity charges for a power purchase agreement, prompting the respondent to invoke the arbitration clause and seek a permanent injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitr

ASSOCIATION OF INDUSTRIAL ELECTRICITY USERSversusSTATE OF A.P. AND ORS.

2002 INSC 1226 March 2002Dismissed

The Association of Industrial Electricity Users challenged the tariff fixed by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission for the financial year 2000-01, contending that the tariff should have been fixed under Section 26(9) and that the Act prohibits classification of consumers or any undue preference. The Hi

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search