Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The respondents, former employees of E.I.D. Parry (I) Ltd., retired under a voluntary scheme in 1984 and received gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Because their monthly wages exceeded Rs 1,000, they were not covered by the definition of "employee" in Section 2(e) of the Central Act, …
The Supreme Court considered a series of civil appeals arising from dismissals of bank employees who sought relief under various State Shops and Establishments Acts. The banks argued that the Acts did not apply to them because they were "establishments under the Central Government" and thus fell …
The Krishna District Co‑operative Marketing Society (the petitioner) retrenched nine clerks, invoking the Andhra Pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1966. The employees (respondents) challenged the terminations, arguing that the retrenchment provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 …
