Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules

10 judgments · newest first · showing 1–10

MARRIPATI NAGARAJA AND ORS.versusTHE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

2007 INSC 1084Disposed off

The appellants applied for the post of Assistant Director of Agriculture under a 1992 APSC notification that did not specify any reservation for women. While the selection process was pending, the Andhra Pradesh Government issued a order on 6 October 1995 granting 30% reservation for women in direct …

MOHD. SIDDIQ ALIversusHIGH COURT OF A.P. THROUGH REGISTRAR AND ORS.

2005 INSC 519Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appointment of District Munsiff magistrates in Andhra Pradesh where a number of women and SC/ST candidates were selected under Rule 22‑A(2) of the Andhra Pradesh State and Subordinate Service Rules. The petitioners argued that the rule, even after amendment, only …

MIR MOHAMMAD KHASIMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 214Appeal(s) allowed

M.M. Khashim, promoted to Deputy Superintendent of Police (Category‑2) in Andhra Pradesh, was placed on probation and passed the required departmental test in 1986. An order dated 6 Oct 1989, issued by the State Government, declared that he had satisfactorily completed his probation as of 27 Jan …

P. MOHAN REDDY ETC.versusE.A.A. CHARLES AND ORS.

2001 INSC 92Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the inter‑se seniority of Deputy Tehsildars in Andhra Pradesh appointed between 10 April 1980 and September 1992. The direct‑recruit appointees argued that their seniority must be fixed according to Rule 4(e) of the 1961 Revenue Subordinate Service Rules, as it stood before the …

A.K. NAZEER SAHEB AND ORSversusA.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS.

1998 INSC 106Appeal(s) allowed

Three candidates were directly recruited as Assistant Directors of Sericulture under the Andhra Pradesh Industries Service Rules. Their appointments were challenged by senior Inspectors of Sericulture on the ground that the required number of permanent posts did not exist, arguing that 'substantive …

V.SREENIVASA REDDY AND ORS.versusGOVT. OF A.P. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 441Dismissed

The appellants were temporarily appointed as Assistant Executive Engineers under Rule 10(a)(i)(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Service Rules in 1980 and later regularised in 1984. The PSC candidates, selected through direct recruitment in 1981, were appointed to the same service in May 1984. The dispute …

GOVERNMENT OF A.P. AND ANR.versusY. SAGARESWARA RAO

1994 INSC 355Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh government reorganised the Panchayat Raj system and framed Adhoc Rules (1989) for appointing Mandal Development Officers (MDO) by transfer of Superintendents, Divisional Panchayat Officers and Extension Officers. The respondent, a Veterinary Assistant Surgeon (Extension Officer), …

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.versusP. RAVINDER & ORS.

1991 INSC 190Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued an order on 18 November 1981 granting a 5% weightage to candidates whose basic education was in Telugu medium for appointments to non‑gazetted posts, expressly limiting the benefit to selections made through the State Public Service Commission (SPSC). The …