Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
1283 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the valuation was excessive and that the arbitrator acted unfairly and with bias. The first award …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged two compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. The first award dated …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud, and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. The first …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, entertained anticipatory bail applications filed by four practising advocates who were named in FIR No. 0544 of 2025 for alleged fraud in land‑acquisition arbitration proceedings. The prosecution alleged that the advocates facilitated the preparation of …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the valuation was excessive, fraudulent and that the arbitrator denied NHAI a fair opportunity to …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for lands acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. The CALA had fixed …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of National Highway 211. CALA’s first award (20‑May‑2017) set compensation rates ranging from Rs 550 to Rs 275 per square …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for lands acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. CALA had …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to enforce an arbitral award that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The award was challenged by a group of landowners under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to acquire land for the widening of NH‑211 and, after the Competent Authority fixed compensation, the aggrieved landowners invoked Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act to refer the dispute to arbitration. The arbitrator enhanced the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, arguing that the awards were void because the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to acquire land for the widening of NH‑211 and, after the Competent Authority for Land Acquisition (CALA) fixed compensation, the aggrieved landowners invoked Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act to refer the dispute to arbitration. The …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the dismissal of its Section 34 applications challenging arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired under National Highway No. 211. The core dispute concerned whether Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the dismissal of its applications under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which had upheld an arbitral award increasing compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211. The appeal raised three …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their mandate by issuing awards after the statutory time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed against a district court order that upheld an arbitral award determining compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The award, issued after nearly six years, increased compensation to Rs …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of National Highway No. 211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their statutory mandate by issuing awards after the twelve‑month period prescribed in Section 29A of the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought to acquire land for the widening of NH‑211 and, after the Competent Authority fixed compensation, the landowners invoked Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act to refer the dispute to arbitration. The arbitrator enhanced the compensation and …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑four arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, arguing that the awards were void because the arbitrators exceeded the twelve‑month time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of National Highway No. 211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their statutory mandate by issuing awards after the twelve‑month period prescribed in Section 29A of the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, arguing that the awards were void because the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning compensation for land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The awards, made by arbitrators appointed under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, increased …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply the valuation …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211 in Gandheli village, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded the time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded the twelve‑month time limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and failed to apply the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) sought arbitration under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956 for compensation on land acquired for the widening of NH 211. The arbitrator enhanced the compensation from Rs 83,19,534 to Rs 1,83,70,388 per square metre. NHAI challenged the …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed ten arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their mandate by issuing awards after the statutory time‑limit under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed against arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired under National Highway No. 211 in Gandheli village. The awards were made by arbitrators appointed under Section 3G(5) of the National Highways Act, 1956, after the parties …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed twenty‑six arbitration awards concerning land acquisition for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the arbitrators exceeded their statutory mandate and failed to apply the compensation parameters of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. …
The National Highways Authority of India filed a batch of appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Principal District Judge, Aurangabad's common judgment dated 16/10/2025 dismissing its Section 34 applications and upholding arbitral awards. Lands in …
The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the dismissal of its Section 34 applications challenging arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the widening of NH 211. The appeals raised three core issues: (i) whether Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of arbitration applications filed by various contractors seeking extensions of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29‑A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applications were filed against the Project Director of the National …
The Municipal Council of Degloor filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 36‑day delay in filing an arbitration appeal and also requested a ten‑week stay on execution of the arbitral award. The council argued that the contract underlying the dispute was not proved, but the arbitral …
The case involved three identical arbitration appeals filed by the Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation against contractor S.S. Deshmukh concerning a renovation contract for a canal. The contractor had obtained an arbitration award, which was subsequently challenged under Section …
The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered the bail application of Shaikh Azhar Shaikh Babu, a contract computer operator arrested in connection with Crime No. 544 of 2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Arbitration and …
Banco Construction Pvt. Ltd. filed an arbitration application against Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar Municipal Corporation. The High Court, acting under its jurisdiction, considered the request to appoint an arbitrator pursuant to Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation …
The High Court considered the bail application of Sanjay, a Revenue Assistant Officer, who was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging forgery of arbitration awards and collusion with the Collector, resulting in a loss of Rs 73.4 crore. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had …
The petitioners, a group of landowners, filed civil applications seeking the withdrawal of amounts deposited with the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) in connection with arbitration proceedings. NHAI opposed the withdrawals, arguing that the applications were an attempt to circumvent a …
The petitioners, a group of landowners, filed civil applications seeking withdrawal of amounts deposited by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) in connection with pending arbitration matters. The High Court had earlier dismissed NHAI’s arbitration appeals on 9 April 2026. NHAI opposed …
The Godavari Urban Multi State Credit Co-operative Society Ltd initiated arbitration against four appellants for recovery of a Rs.24 lakh loan, resulting in an arbitral award of Rs.33,87,408 with interest. The appellants challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, …
The Godavari Urban Multi State Credit Co-operative Society Ltd initiated arbitration against four appellants for non‑repayment of a Rs 24 lakh loan. The Arbitral Tribunal awarded the society Rs 33,87,408 with interest, which the appellants challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and …
The appellant, Arun Punjaji Kadu, had taken a loan of Rs.2,00,000 from Kanhur Pathar Multi State Co‑op. Soc. Ltd. (respondent No.1) which was not repaid, leading to arbitration under Section 84 of the Multi State Co‑operative Societies Act, 1984. The first arbitral award dated 31‑03‑2013 was set …
The appellant, Arun Punjaji Kadu, had taken a loan of Rs.2,00,000 from Kanhur Pathar Multi State Co‑op. Soc. Ltd. (a cooperative society under the MSCS Act). The first arbitration under Section 84 of the MSCS Act resulted in an award dated 31‑03‑2013, which was set aside by the Principal District …
The applicant, Grow More Investment And Financial Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration application seeking confirmation of the appointment of a sole arbitrator. The proposed arbitrator, Mr. Mohan Vyankat Jawale, submitted a letter of acceptance and a statement of disclosure. The High Court noted that the …
The applicant, Jaganath Govindrao Phulare, sought the withdrawal of the full amount of an arbitration award of Rs.14,31,37,791 dated 28 December 2018, which had previously been challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and dismissed. The respondent, the Union of …
The petitioner, Rajendra Uttamchand Katariya, filed a writ petition against the National Highway Authority of India seeking solatium and interest on compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act. The petitioner relied on paragraph 14 of the Supreme Court's judgment in National …
The petitioners, landowners whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, filed a writ petition seeking solatium and interest on their compensation, invoking paragraph 14 of the Supreme Court's decision in National Highways Authority of India v. Tarsem Singh (Review Petition No. 2528 of …
The petitioner, Shri Ramshwar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., challenged an order dated 06‑02‑2021 appointing an arbitrator under Section 84 of the Multi‑State Co‑operative Societies Act. The dispute centered on whether the Central Registrar could appoint an arbitrator unilaterally, without a …
The petitioners, landowners whose lands were acquired for national highways, filed writ petitions seeking the payment of solatium and interest on their compensation. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Writ Petition No. 13783 of 2025 and to the Supreme Court’s directions in Union of …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) appealed the arbitral awards that enhanced compensation for land acquired for the expansion of National Highway 361 in Chakur, Latur. The dispute centered on whether the arbitrator correctly applied the market‑value determination provisions of the 2013 …
The petitioners, Sanjay Anandrao Patil and another, filed a writ petition seeking computation and payment of solatium and interest on compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act. The High Court referred to the coordinate bench decision in Writ Petition No. 13783 of 2025 and the …
The parties' agreement contained an arbitration clause designating Anand, Gujarat as the venue and granting jurisdiction to the courts in Anand for any disputes. The respondent raised a preliminary objection, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Brahmani River Pellets Ltd. v. Kamachi …
The petitioners, landowners whose lands were acquired for national highways, filed writ petitions seeking solatium and interest on their compensation. The High Court referred to its earlier coordinate bench decision in Writ Petition No. 13783 of 2025 and to the Supreme Court’s judgment in Union of …
The petitioners, landowners whose property was acquired under the National Highways Act, filed a writ petition seeking solatium and interest on their compensation. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s directions in National Highways Authority of India v. Tarsem Singh (Review Petition No. …
The applicant, a partner in M/s. Ramanuj Ventures, filed an arbitration application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoking clause 20 of the partnership deed. Respondent No.1 contended that the applicant had waived the arbitration right by earlier instituting …
The land of the late Vasant Ghanshyamdas Haujawala was acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956 and a compensation award was issued. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) attempted to challenge the award by invoking Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, but the …
The land of the deceased Shaikh Taru Shaikh Hasan was acquired under the National Highways Act, 1956 and an award was issued by the Competent Authority. The National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the award via a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed three appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, but the appeals were lodged 630 days after the impugned orders. NHAI sought condonation of the delay, citing internal administrative approvals and financial arrangements as reasons. The Court …
The application was filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator pursuant to Clause 20 of a Memorandum of Understanding dated 28‑02‑2022 between M/s Bhagwan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Garud Zep Career Academy. The MOU provided that …
Arvind Pundalik Dhamne filed a writ petition challenging the district judge's order that condoned a 13‑day delay in filing a Section 34 application under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to contest an arbitral award on land acquisition compensation. The petitioner argued that the delay was …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) deposited fifty percent of the compensation amount determined by an arbitral tribunal, which had been upheld by the Principal District Judge after rejecting a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The High Court …
The applicant, M/s. Datta Sai Services, filed a civil application under Section 29-A(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an extension of time for completing arbitration proceedings against M/s. Om Sai Industries. The High Court examined whether it possessed the authority to …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of arbitration applications filed by various contractors seeking extensions of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29‑A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applications were filed against the Project Director of the National …
The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a batch of arbitration applications filed by various contractors seeking extensions of the arbitrator's mandate under Section 29‑A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The applications were filed against the Project Director of the National …
Hemlata Manikchand Chudiwal filed an arbitration appeal (Arbitration Appeal No. 36 of 2025) challenging an order and contended that the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was not maintainable. The appellant sought leave to withdraw the appeal while preserving the …
Hemlata Manikchand Chudiwal filed an arbitration appeal against Gtl Infrastructure Limited and another party, challenging an order under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The appellant's counsel argued that the appeal under Section 37 of the Act was not maintainable and sought leave to …
The appellants, owners of land acquired for the widening of National Highway No. 361, challenged the arbitral awards that granted compensation of Rs 399 per square metre for lands away from the highway, while lands abutting the highway received Rs 680 per square metre. They argued that under Section …
The applicant, Dr. Yogesh Baliram Vargantwar, filed an arbitration application under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an extension of the arbitrator's mandate. The Supreme Court's recent decision in Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule (2026 LiveLaw SC 89) held that …
The appellants, owners of land acquired for the widening of National Highway No.361, challenged the arbitral awards that granted them compensation of Rs.399 per square metre, arguing that the arbitrator improperly differentiated compensation for similarly situated lands. The arbitrator had awarded …
Satyajeet Uday Shisode filed a writ petition seeking solatium and interest on compensation for land acquired under the National Highways Act. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s directions in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, which outline entitlement to such additional amounts for landowners …
The petitioner, Madhusudan Babulal Bhartiya, challenged an order dated 17 July 2019 issued by the learned Arbitrator and District Collector, Aurangabad, which rejected his arbitration application concerning land acquired under the National Highways Authority. The respondent argued that the …
The petitioner, a landowner whose claim for compensation under the National Highways Act was pending as of 28 March 2008, sought solatium and interest on the compensation awarded for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India. The Court examined the directions issued in the Supreme …
The petitioner, Rajesh Chandramal Galani, filed a writ petition seeking solatium and interest on compensation for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI). The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Union of India v. Tarsem Singh, which laid down criteria for …
The petitioners, landowners whose lands were acquired under the National Highways Act, sought solatium, interest and interest on solatium on their compensation. The High Court examined the directions issued by the Supreme Court in National Highways Authority of India v. Tarsem Singh (Review Petition …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of consolidated civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in filing first appeals and a modification of the interest clause in an arbitral award. The respondents did not contest the applications, and the court …
Petitioner Kailas Murlidhar Agrawal filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking solatium and interest on compensation awarded for land acquired under the National Highways Act. The Court referred to a recent Supreme Court review order in NHAI v. Tarsem Singh, which laid down …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and challenging a paragraph of the impugned award that granted interest contrary to established law. The respondents did not contest the …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and challenging a clause in the impugned award that granted interest contrary to established law. The respondents did not contest the …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division and others (applicants) filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals against the award made to Maruti Ambu Mastud and another (respondents). The applicants argued that there was no …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in filing first appeals against an arbitral award. The respondents did not contest the applications, and the Court noted that the delay had implications for the …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and challenging a specific paragraph of an arbitral award that granted interest contrary to established law. The respondents did not …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division and others filed a series of civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in preferring first appeals and rectification of an award of interest dated 13‑09‑2017. The applicants argued that the award of interest was contrary to …
The Executive Engineer, Osmanabad Medium Project Division filed multiple civil applications seeking condonation of a 2,866‑day delay in filing first appeals against an award of a reference court. The applicants also contested a clause awarding interest that they alleged was inconsistent with the law …
The petitioner, a former partner of M/s New Dhanraj Liquors, sued the other partners and the Maharashtra authorities for a perpetual injunction to prevent them from obtaining a liquor licence in the name of a newly formed partnership, M/s D.R. Distributors. The defendant‑4 filed an application under …
The applicant filed an arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator pursuant to Clause 18 of a reconstituted partnership deed dated 16‑01‑2007. The applicant issued a notice on 29‑09‑2025 invoking the arbitration clause, …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging that the awards were excessively low and that the arbitrator acted unfairly and with bias. …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation award of Rs.550 per square metre granted by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for widening National Highway 211, arguing that the award was excessive, fraudulent and that the arbitrator denied …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud, and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. The first …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the awards were based on undervalued rates and that the arbitrator acted unfairly and with bias. The …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for lands acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging that the award of Rs 550 per sq m was excessive and that the arbitrator acted unfairly, manipulated …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud, and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. CALA had …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged two compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of NH‑211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud and denial of a fair hearing before the arbitrator. The CALA had fixed …
The applicants, practising advocates, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 0544 of 2025 alleging fraud in land‑acquisition arbitration orders. The prosecution alleged that the advocates facilitated back‑dated arbitration awards, leading to an inflated compensation of Rs. 310.20 crore …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) appealed against a district court order that upheld a land‑acquisition compensation award of Rs.550 per square metre made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) on 20 May 2017. NHAI alleged that the award was excessive, that the arbitrator …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards granted by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for lands acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud, and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. The …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) challenged the compensation awards made by the Competent Authority Land Acquisition (CALA) for land acquired for the widening of National Highway 211, alleging excessive valuation, fraud, and denial of fair opportunity before the arbitrator. CALA had …
The petitioner, Rajendrakumar Madanlal Surana, filed a civil application seeking an extension of the arbitration mandate under section 29-A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioner’s counsel argued that a recent Supreme Court judgment in Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule …
The applicant filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim relief to enforce a non‑compete clause. The court had earlier rejected the interim relief. The applicant never issued a notice under Section 16 nor invoked the arbitration clause under …
The petitioners Silverstone Logistics and partners filed a writ petition challenging a July 14, 2026 order of the District Judge‑1, North Goa, which stayed proceedings in Commercial Matter No.64/2026/B before the Commercial Court at Merces. They alleged that the order was passed without any notice …
The applicant, ViiKing Beverages Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act in the High Court of Bombay at Goa seeking extension of an arbitrator's mandate. The Supreme Court, in Jagdeep Chowgule v. Sheela Chowgule (2026 SCC OnLine SC 124), held that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act seeking appointment of an arbitrator, which the respondent opposed on the ground that no arbitral dispute existed. The court held that such objections are not relevant to the question of appointment and can be raised before …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 08.05.2026 that stayed an arbitral award of 08.06.2023, subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the compensation in the District Court within two months. The respondents argued that the order was …
The petitioners, Warana Sugar Ltd. and others, challenged a District Judge’s order that overruled their objection to the respondent’s application filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The petitioners argued that the application was not maintainable because the …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a series of writ petitions challenging a District Judge's order directing it to deposit 50% of an enhanced compensation amount awarded by an arbitrator on 6 February 2023. The compensation related to land acquired under awards dated 5 and 14 …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a series of writ petitions challenging a district judge's order that required it to deposit 50% of the enhanced compensation awarded to landowners after an arbitration award. The land had been acquired under awards dated August 2019, and the …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) acquired land and paid compensation to claimants, which was later enhanced by an arbitrator on 6 February 2023. The District Judge, Malshiras, directed NHAI to deposit 50% of the enhanced amount, prompting NHAI to file multiple writ petitions under …
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a series of writ petitions challenging a district judge's order directing it to deposit 50% of the enhanced compensation awarded by an arbitrator on 6 February 2023 to landowners whose lands were acquired for a highway project. The landowners had …
The petitioners, a husband‑wife duo, owned flats in a co‑operative housing society that underwent redevelopment. After refusing to vacate, they were compelled by an arbitration order to hand over possession, and the redevelopment was completed with other members taking possession of new units. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 16 July 2013. The court examined the notice of arbitration dated 16 May 2026 and the respondent's reply, and …
The applicant, CMR Surgical India Pvt Ltd, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 28 February 2022. The court examined the arbitration clause in the agreement and …
The applicant, K Sera Sera Box Office Pvt Ltd, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a Franchise Agreement, Content Agreement and Franchise Food Business and Safety Agreement dated …
The DY Patil International School filed an arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, invoking an arbitration clause in an agreement dated 17 July 2023. The respondent, Jacob Paul, contested the appointment, leading the court to examine whether a valid …
The applicant, PGD Skyline LLP, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 31 March 2022. The court examined the arbitration clause (Clause 26) and found that a …
The Bombay High Court entertained an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Tata Capital Limited seeking appointment of an arbitrator pursuant to an arbitration clause in an agreement dated 8 August 2012. The court examined the notice dated 27 January …
IIFL Finance Ltd. granted a Rs 15 lakh business loan to the respondents, who subsequently defaulted on repayments. IIFL issued a loan recall notice demanding full repayment, but the respondents neither paid nor responded, and allegedly began disposing of assets. IIFL filed a petition under Section 9 …
The Kolhapur Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) challenged an arbitral award of Rs 24,06,50,119.03 awarded to Fairdeal Construction (Respondent) under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The award also granted pendente‑lite interest at 18% from 1997, post‑award interest at 18% …
The applicant, IIFL Finance Ltd, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 21 November 2024 with Nimpari Jewellers. The court examined the record and found that the …
IIFL Finance Ltd., having granted a business loan of Rs.10,22,846 to Jay Shree Shyam Traders and another, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim protection after the respondents defaulted, ignored a loan recall notice, and allegedly began …
IIFL Finance Ltd granted a Rs.30 lakh business loan to New Pal Motors and another respondent, which they defaulted on. IIFL issued a loan recall notice demanding full repayment, but the respondents neither paid nor appeared before the court, and failed to disclose their assets as ordered. IIFL filed …
The petitioner, IIFL Finance Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim protection after the respondents defaulted on a Rs.10,00,000 business loan and failed to comply with a loan recall notice. The respondents neither appeared before the …
IIFL Finance Ltd. granted a term loan of up to Rs.15,18,000 to Yashvi Impex & Others, which the respondents defaulted on despite a Loan Recall Notice dated 2 May 2025. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim protection, alleging …
The petitioner, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an award dated 16 September 2015 that required it to pay amounts to the respondent, Engineering Services. Both parties later executed a …
IIFL Finance Ltd filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 16 March 2024 with Kunal Electronics and another respondent. The applicant invoked the arbitration clause …
IIFL Finance Limited filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 28 August 2018 with Ashok John Sequeira. The applicant invoked the arbitration clause by issuing a …
IIFL Finance Ltd filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 25 July 2024. The applicant invoked the arbitration clause by issuing a notice on 27 March 2026. The Court …
IIFL Finance Ltd. granted a Rs 10 lakh business loan to Urban Garden Store & Nursery and, after the borrowers defaulted, issued a recall notice demanding full repayment of Rs 12,75,622.79. The borrowers failed to respond, did not appear before the court, and ignored an order to disclose their …
The petition was filed by Parekh Corporation under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a court order to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal so that it may complete the arbitration and publish its award. The petitioner relied on an affidavit of service to …
The applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 24 May 2022. The court examined the notice dated 15 December 2025 and found that the …
The High Court of Bombay entertained an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising under a contract dated 27 January 2022. The court examined the notice of arbitration …
The applicant, Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 18 November 2022. The court examined the notice issued by the applicant and found …
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 18 November 2022. The bank had invoked the arbitration clause by issuing a notice on 15 …
The Bombay High Court entertained an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. seeking appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 27 July 2021. The court examined the notice issued by the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 9 January 2023. The court examined the record and found that a valid arbitration clause existed and had been …
The petition was filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking an extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate to complete the arbitration and issue its award. The tribunal was at the stage of cross‑examining the claimant’s first witness, indicating substantial …
The petitioner, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an award dated 16 September 2015 that required it to pay amounts to the respondent, Engineering Services. Both parties later executed a …
The petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 sought a direction to refer a dispute between partners of Shree Gajanan S.K. Developers LLP to arbitration. The respondent alleged that the petitioner committed a criminal breach of trust by entering into a separate …
The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. (SCIL) contracted with Chugoku Marines Paints S PTE Ltd for marine paints, invoicing USD 82,970.28 which SCIL claimed to have paid, but the payment was fraudulently diverted. The dispute was referred to arbitration, and a sole arbitrator issued an award on 30 …
The Union of India sought to set aside an arbitral award of Rs 2,45,97,550 /- dated 22 February 2023 concerning post‑warranty maintenance of ATVM kiosks. The award was to be published only after receipt of arbitral fees, which were paid in May 2023, and the original signed award was received by the …
Jayant Infratech Ltd. entered into a contract with RCCPL Private Ltd. for OHE and PSI works at a railway siding. After completing the work and the defects liability period, the applicant sought the retention amount, which the respondent refused to pay. The applicant invoked the arbitration clause in …
The Applicant, Renuka Logistics, sought appointment of a Sole Arbitrator under Clause 13.2 of a Service Provider Agreement dated 18 November 2022 against Qwik Supply Chain Private Limited (Respondent No.1) and another entity (Respondent No.2) in respect of unpaid amounts arising from …
The dispute arose from a contract between Ujjwal Pune Limited and the Pune Municipal Corporation for replacement of street‑light fixtures with LED units. The contract contained an arbitration clause (clause 26) stipulating that a three‑member arbitral tribunal would be formed, each party selecting …
The petitioner, appointed as a business development consultant, helped form a joint venture and was promised a shareholding in the venture under a Mandate Agreement. Although the agreement was executed and the respondent later confirmed entitlement to 20% (later increased to 30%) of the shares, the …
The petitioner, Shritech Consulting Inc., entered into a consultancy agreement with the respondent, Yooil Engineering Co Ltd, in 2015 to act as exclusive business development consultant for government projects, receiving 10% of purchase order values. The petitioner alleges that a substantial portion …
IIFL Finance Ltd gave a business loan of Rs 9,82,000 to Shree Balaji Bandhej, which the respondent defaulted on. IIFL issued a loan recall notice on 1 January 2026 demanding repayment of Rs 76,53,51 with interest, but the respondent neither paid nor replied. IIFL alleged that the respondent was …
IIFL Finance Ltd granted a business loan of Rs.10,22,206.43 to Ganesha Enterprises, which defaulted on repayments. The lender issued a Loan Recall Notice on 1 January 2026 demanding full repayment, but the borrower neither responded nor paid the outstanding amount. The petitioner alleged that the …
IIFL Finance Ltd granted a business loan to Sass Enterprises under a loan agreement containing an arbitration clause. The respondent defaulted on repayments, and IIFL issued a recall notice demanding full repayment, which the respondent ignored. IIFL alleged the respondent was attempting to transfer …
IIFL Finance Ltd. granted a business loan of Rs.10,12,676 to Durga Grah Udhyog, which the respondents defaulted on despite a loan recall notice dated 1 January 2026. IIFL filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim protection, alleging that the …
The petitioner, IIFL Finance Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim protection after the respondents defaulted on a business loan and failed to respond to a loan recall notice. The loan agreement contained an arbitration clause, and the …
IIFL Finance Ltd., the petitioner, entered into a business loan agreement with Prabhu Naidu Private Ltd., the respondent, which contained an arbitration clause. The respondent defaulted on loan repayments, prompting the petitioner to issue a loan recall notice demanding full repayment. The …
The applicant, Shabnoor Ayub, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 19 April 2024. The applicant had invoked the arbitration clause by issuing notices on 28 July …
Kotak Mahindra Bank filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of a sole arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 7 February 2023. The parties had an arbitration clause (Clause 10.15) agreeing to refer any …
The High Court of Bombay, on an arbitration application filed by Dharma Products Private Limited against K. Vishnu Vardhan, appointed Mr. Tushad Kakalia as the sole arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from an agreement dated 21 February 2022. The court directed the petitioner to furnish the …
The applicant, Shabnoor Ayub, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from two Shareholders' Agreements dated February and August 2024. The applicant had invoked the arbitration clause by …
The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …
The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …
The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …
The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …
The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …
The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …
The Zoroastrian Radih Society, a charitable trust, entered individual sale agreements with flat purchasers that contain an arbitration clause. The purchasers later formed the Behramshah Shroff Building Co‑operative Housing Society, which failed to execute a lease deed and to pay ground‑lease rent, …
The High Court heard an interim application in a commercial arbitration petition where both parties agreed that there was no grievance against the previous arbitrator and only legal pleas were raised. The Court set aside the impugned order and, finding no opposition, appointed Mr. Swanand Ganoo, …
The High Court of Bombay entertained an arbitration petition filed by ICICI Home Finance Company Limited against Kiran Brijendra Killawala. Earlier, on 10 June 2025, the Court had granted ad‑interim relief under prayer clauses (c) and (d) of the petition. The present order considered whether that …
The applicant, ICICI Home Finance Company Ltd., invoked the arbitration clause in its facility agreements dated August 2024 by issuing a notice on 21 April 2025. The respondent objected, contending that a mediation clause in the agreements required the parties to undergo mediation before proceeding …
IIFL Finance Ltd., the petitioner, granted a Rs 20 lakh SME business loan to Orchid Facility Management Pvt Ltd, which defaulted on repayments. The petitioner issued a loan recall notice demanding full repayment of Rs 17,53,498.98 and alleged that the respondents were attempting to transfer or …
The applicant, Girish Damji Shah & Anr., invoked an arbitration clause contained in an agreement dated 27 March 2022 by issuing a notice on 27 April 2026. The High Court examined whether a valid and subsisting arbitration agreement existed and whether the disputes, including the name of the …
The applicant, K Sera Sera Box Office Pvt Ltd, invoked an arbitration clause contained in agreements dated 3 October 2022 by issuing a notice on 8 October 2025. The respondent, Pari Entertainment Lounge, contested the appointment, leading the High Court to examine whether a valid arbitration …
The petitioner, Rajinder Pal Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the Additional District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, to decide Arbitration Case No.4 of 2022 (NHAI vs. Rajinder Pal Singh) within a fixed period. The petitioner argued that an application under Section 34 of …
The petitioner, Sukhvindar Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 227 seeking a direction to the District Judge, Kanpur Dehat, to decide Arbitration Case No. 7 of 2023 (NHAI v. Sukhvindar Singh) within a fixed period as mandated by Section 34(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking a direction for the speedy disposal of pending arbitration petitions concerning compensation under the Railways Act, 1989. The court noted that the competent authority had already passed an award and that the petitioners could approach the appointed …
The petitioner, Kamalasha Infrastructure and Engineering, entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Om Power and Infrastructure Prop, which contained a multi-tiered dispute resolution clause culminating in arbitration of three arbitrators seated in Nashik. A dispute arose and the petitioner …
The applicant, a joint owner and authorised representative of the T.J. Mirani Estate, sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a 2002 Development Agreement with the developer (Respondent No.1). The …
The applicant, a joint owner and authorised representative of the T.J. Mirani Estate, sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a 2002 Development Agreement with the developer (Respondent No.1). The …
The applicants, Wellgroomed Venture, entered into a 2014 agreement to sell a commercial unit to the respondent, Ganesh Kulkarni, who later failed to pay maintenance, assessment and other charges amounting to Rs.29,36,552. The applicants invoked Clause 51 of the agreement to seek arbitration under …
The applicant, Axis Finance Ltd., sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, alleging defaults by the respondent, Inspira Enterprise India Ltd., under a term‑loan agreement dated 22 Nov 2022. The dispute centred on whether Clause 14.5 of the …
The applicant, a joint owner and authorised representative of the T.J. Mirani Estate, sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a 2002 Development Agreement with the developer (Respondent No.1). The …
The applicant, a joint owner and authorised representative of the T.J. Mirani Estate, sought appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a 2002 Development Agreement with the developer (Respondent No.1). The …
M/S Kec International Ltd entered into a contract with North Central Railway for supply and erection of a 25 kV feeder wire. After delays attributable to the railway, Kec sought an extension, which was granted, and later submitted a claim for prolongation that the railway rejected. On 30 March 2026 …
Multifactor LLP filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator after DLT Labs failed to pay invoices under a lease agreement and ignored a notice invoking the arbitration clause. The notice was served by publication and …
The applicant, M/s C.L. Gupta & Sons, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator. The respondent argued that the arbitration agreement expressly required the arbitration to be held in Lucknow and that the parties …
The petitioners, owners of a parcel of land, invoked an arbitration clause (clause 26) in a 2011 development agreement to resolve disputes with various developers and family members who were either parties or successors to parties to the agreement. The respondents, including non‑signatories, …
The petition sought appointment of an arbitrator under an arbitration clause in a dealership agreement dated 1 January 2025. The respondent consented to the appointment but the court could not pass an order because the respondent had not filed a vakalatnama, which was later e‑filed and was under …
M/S Hari Narayan Rai entered into a contract with GMR Infrastructure Ltd for earthwork under the DFCC project. Work was delayed by monsoon, after which a second purchase order was issued and the work was completed. The respondent later issued a notice of liquidated damages of Rs. 50,000 and …
Aryatech Platforms Private Limited supplied commodities to Vardhman Solvent Extraction Industries Limited, but the latter failed to clear the invoices despite demand and legal notices. The parties could not mutually appoint an arbitrator under Clause 9.2 of their agreement, and the respondent did …
The petitioner, Nakshatra Vinay Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner indeed …
Harbhajan Singh filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an arbitral award. The respondents argued that the petitioner had an alternative remedy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court examined Section 34 and concluded that the petitioner …
The petitioner sought interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, relying on an alleged admission by the respondent in NCLT proceedings that it owed Rs 37,38,150. The respondent pointed out a subsequent NCLT judgment on the merits, dated 23 January 2024, which found …
The petitioners, Shabnoor Ayub Pathan and others, invoked an arbitration clause (Clause 29) in an agreement dated 18 December 2018 by issuing a notice on 2 April 2026. The respondents, Aum Punit Realty LLP and another, contested the appointment of an arbitrator, leading the Court to examine whether …
The Bombay High Court was approached by Trucap Finance Ltd under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an arbitrator for disputes arising from seven Business Loan Agreements dated 30 December 2024. The applicant had invoked the arbitration clause contained in Clause 36 …
Flying Earth LLP, a limited liability partnership, was appointed developer by Date Bungalow Cooperative Housing Society Ltd (the Society) for redevelopment of its building after a majority vote and approval by the Deputy Registrar. A Development Agreement dated 22 March 2025 containing an …
Tata Consumer Product Ltd filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a Super Stockist Agreement dated 1 April 2019. The respondents objected, arguing that parallel arbitral proceedings …
Waaree Energies Limited filed arbitration application No.27 of 2026 against Orbital Electromech Engineering Projects Pvt Ltd. The parties subsequently reached an amicable settlement. The court noted that any default by either party that would give the other a right to file a fresh application under …
The petitioners, a group of land owners, entered into a joint venture agreement with City Corporation Limited, a developer, on 13 September 2007, which contains an arbitration clause. The petitioners served notice in July 2023 seeking cancellation of the agreement and invoked the arbitration clause …
The petitioner, IIFL Finance Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim protection after the respondents defaulted on a term loan of Rs 16,69,883 and failed to comply with a loan recall notice. The respondents did not appear, file a reply, or …
The applicant, IIFL Finance Limited, filed an arbitration application before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant’s counsel sought permission to withdraw that application and requested liberty to file any other appropriate proceeding, except under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation …
The applicant, RD Traders, filed an arbitration application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking a sole arbitrator for disputes arising from tax invoices, delivery challans and an account confirmation statement dated between August and September 2024. The applicant …
Surya Alloy Industries Ltd filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a purchase order dated 29 November 2024. The parties had an arbitration clause in their contract (Clauses 2093 and …
The applicants, B D Agarwal Buildtech India Private Limited and another, filed an arbitration application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitrator. The respondents, the Engineer‑In‑Chief Directorate of Contract Management (E8) and …
B D Agarwal Buildtech India Private Limited and another filed an application under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve a dispute with the Engineer‑In‑Chief, Directorate of Contract Management, Ministry of Defence. The court …
Tata Projects Ltd entered into an EPC contract with Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Ltd for a GIS sub‑station. Owing to COVID‑19 and alleged project‑management failures, the work was delayed, leading the contractor to claim Rs 33.99 cr and the respondent to reject the claim. The parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator. The arbitration agreement between the parties contains a clause stipulating that the place of arbitration shall be Lucknow. Respondents raised a preliminary …
