Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Arms Act, 1950

9 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DR. NARENDRA K AMINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.

2008 INSC 53328 April 2008Dismissed

Dr. Narendra Kamin, accused in the Sohrabuddin fake‑encounter case and charged with several serious offences under the IPC and the Arms Act, was granted bail by the Additional City and Sessions Judge. The State of Gujarat filed an application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to cancel the bail, an

MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 24424 February 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The incident occurred on 12 February 1975 at Lalitpur bus stand where the appellant Mahendra Pratap Singh was alleged to have fired a single bullet from a rifle, causing the death of Devendra Singh and injuries to three others. The trial court acquitted him, but the Allahabad High Court convicted him under IPC sections

STATE OF PUNJABversusAJAIB SINGH

1995 INSC 6920 January 1995Dismissed

In an altercation on the GT Road in 1976, Sub‑Inspector Ajaib Singh shot and killed Assistant Sub‑Inspector Gurnam Singh and Constable Paramjit Singh. The trial court convicted Singh under Section 302 IPC and the Arms Act, but the Punjab & Haryana High Court acquitted him, holding that he acted in private defence under

SIDHARTHA VASHISHT @ MANU SHARMAversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI)

2010 INSC 21919 April 2010Dismissed After

The case concerns the murder of Jessica Lal on 30 April 1999, for which Sidhartha Vashisht (Manu Sharma) and two co‑accused were initially acquitted by the trial court. The State appealed, alleging that the prosecution had proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt through ocular testimony, telephone call

ASIM AKHTARversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANR.

2024 INSC 79418 October 2024Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Asim Akhtar, was charged with kidnapping and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act. During trial, the victim and her parents were examined-in-chief, but their cross‑examination was delayed after the appellant filed an application under Section 319 CrPC to summon the appellant's parents. The prosecu

GHURELAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2011 INSC 41817 June 2011Dismissed

The case involves a dacoity on 16-17 December 1996 in which two persons were murdered and movable property was looted. Six accused were identified through test identification parades and the stolen articles, weapons and a vehicle were recovered based on their disclosures. They were convicted under Sections 395, 396 and

GULAM MOHD. @ GULAL SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2008 INSC 128511 November 2008Dismissed

Gulam Mohd (Gulal Shaikh) was charged under several IPC, POTA and Arms Act provisions for alleged terrorist activities. He claimed that a confession recorded under Section 32 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 was obtained while he was in illegal custody and later retracted it. He applied for bail under Section 4

AMITSINGH BHIKAMSING THAKURversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2007 INSC 125 January 2007Dismissed

The case arose from a robbery‑murder where the victim’s shop‑assistant (PW‑1) and other eyewitnesses identified four accused persons, including the appellant, after a test identification parade (TIP) and a confession obtained under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The appellant challenged the conviction on three grounds

MUKHTIAR SINGH AND ANR. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB ETC.

1995 INSC 64 January 1995Remitted to Lower Court

Eleven accused were tried before the Special Court, Ferozepur for murder and related offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The trial court convicted some and acquitted others but its judgment contained only conclusions without any discussion of evidence or reasons. Appeals were filed under Section 14 of the Terrorist Af

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search