Created by Fuzzy Cloud

B.N.S., 2023

764 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

AVINASH GENA PANDULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioner, Avinash Gena Pandule, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a direction for a special independent investigating team to conduct investigation into Crime No.12/2026 under Section 108 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 39 of the Maharashtra Money Lending Regulation Act, 2014. The …

ADITYA BHARTIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Aditya Bhartiya, sought bail in a murder case (Section‑103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, equivalent to IPC s.302) after the charge was framed on 27‑01‑2026. This was his second bail application; the first was rejected because CCTV footage placed him with the deceased and a scarf used in the …

ARVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Arvind Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 26‑01‑2026 under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, and requested that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State opposed the merits of the petition but …

PANKAJ GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Pankaj Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 11 September 2026 under Section 74 of the B.N.S., 2023, and requested that the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any arrest. The State …

SMT RAJVATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Rajvati under Section 482 CrPC in connection with a FIR alleging her participation in an assault on police officers during a public disturbance. The applicant, a woman with no prior criminal record, claimed she was falsely …

SUNIL KUMAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Yadav under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving alleged fraud in property sale deeds. The applicant claimed he was a marginal witness falsely implicated, with no criminal antecedents, while the prosecution alleged he …

CHAMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Chaman, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (Crime No. 120 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 308(5), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) and 126 of the B.N.S., 2023. He claimed false implication, arguing that the …

VINOD YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Vinod Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 9‑August‑2026 under Sections 329(3), 221 and 132 of the B.N.S. 2023 and a direction that he not be arrested. He also prayed that, before any arrest, the police follow the Supreme Court guidelines laid down in …

AFTAB ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aftab Alam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking the quash of an FIR dated 16 September 2026 registered under Sections 76 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023, and also requested that the police not arrest him. The petitioner’s counsel prayed that, before any arrest, the …

HARNARAYAN AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Harnarayan and five others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 9 September 2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 191(2), 351(3), 352 and 85 of the B.N.S., 2023, and to obtain a direction that they not be arrested. The petitioners also prayed that, …

X JUVENILEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The juvenile applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in BNSS No. 10363 of 2026. After hearing, the applicant’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application in Crime No. 138 of 2026. The …

YADAVATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Yadavati, a 69‑year‑old woman, under Section 482 CrPC in connection with FIR No.209 of 2026 alleging offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 109, 351(3), 333 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant was alleged to have used …

KAPIL KUMAR PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Kapil Kumar Prajapati applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 134 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the BNSS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that he had enticed the daughter of the first informant, but the victim’s statement under Sections 180 and 183 of …

BOBI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 118(1), 117(2) and 110 of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a case alleging assault causing injuries to three persons. They claimed false implication, asserted that the alleged offences carry a maximum punishment of seven years, …

UDAY PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Sections 318(4), 338, 339 and 340(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 in Crime No.184 of 2026. The court dismissed the application of applicant No.2 as withdrawn after the counsel agreed to re‑file with a full disclosure of his criminal …

MONU @ MOHIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Monu @ Mohit Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 115(2) and 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a case where he is allegedly implicated. The FIR, lodged two days after the incident, does not name the applicant, and a video presented by the …

JITENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. He feared arrest and sought protection to appear before the trial court and apply for regular bail. …

RAVINDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravindra Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest. The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to appear before the trial court …

SAHIL @ GANJUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sahil @ Ganju, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S., 2023 in Crime No. 277 of 2026, fearing arrest. He also sought permission to appear before the trial court and apply for regular bail. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no objection …

SMT SHABEENA KHATOONversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Smt. Shabeena Khatoon in a case where she was not named in the FIR but was implicated through a recovered marks sheet and a co-accused's confessional statement. The applicant argued that similar co-accused who were also not named in …

SUMIT GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Sumit Gupta, filed an anticipatory bail application in Crime No. 383 of 2026, alleging false implication in a case involving the alleged preparation of fake Inter State Transit Passes (ISTP) that caused revenue loss to the State. The FIR listed 23 accused but did not specifically …

PRATEEK JAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Prateek Jain and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quash of an FIR dated 11‑01‑2025 under Sections 103 and 104 of the Trade Mark Act, 1999 and Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, and also a mandamus directing the release of seized goods. The …

PUTTU LAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Puttu Lal Gupta filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 17‑12‑2025 that arose from a monetary dispute. The Court referred the matter to its Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the parties reached a settlement agreement on 07‑08‑2026, which they both affirmed as fully …

ANANG KAUSHIKversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed a second anticipatory bail application under the inherent powers of the High Court (Section 482) in a murder case, claiming a new ground that a witness, Ajay Kumar Singh, had recorded a statement after the first bail application was rejected. The State opposed, stating the …

SMT. TABASSUMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Smt. Tabassum filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of Crime No. 50 of 2026 under sections 333, 64(1), 89 of the CrPC and section 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner argued that the …

ANIT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Anit Kumar and Vinayak, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, fearing arrest in a case (Crime No. 266 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 352 and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. They contended …

HARIKESH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Harikesh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking (i) a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 01‑02‑2026 registered under sections 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S 2023 and sections 3/4 of the DP Act, and (ii) a writ of …

GAURI SHANKAR @ GAURI SHANKAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Gauri Shankar, who was alleged to have induced investors to deposit money with VEALL Mutual Benefit Nidhi Limited under a scheme promising to double the amount in six years. The applicant contended that he was merely an agent of the …

MANJEET PRATAP SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, husband of a woman who died by suicide within seven years of marriage, sought bail in a criminal case filed under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, 1961. He claimed false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and that the charge sheet …

UMA RAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

Uma Ram and Lal Devi, the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, were charged under Sections 80(2), 85 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They contended that there was no material linking them to any dowry harassment and that the …

AKANKSHA DEVI @ AKANKSHA SHIVHAREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akanksha Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation in which the charge under Section 103 of the B.N.S., 2023 was later substituted by Section 108 of the same Act. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel admitted the factual correctness of …

SARVESH KUMAR MAURYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sarvesh Kumar Maurya and another, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 61(2), 340(2), 336(3), 338 and 318(4) of the B.N.S., 2023 in a criminal case (Crime No. 349 of 2026) fearing arrest. The counsel for the applicants sought interim protection to appear before the …

SATENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Satendra Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 85, 109(1), 115(2), 117(3), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a criminal case (Crime No.0152 of 2026). The counsel requested that the applicant be allowed to appear before the concerned court and …

KUNDAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Kundan Singh, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2), 115(2) and 85 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, 1961. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that there was no material to invoke the presumption of dowry death, and that his …

SATISH RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Satish Rajbhar in a criminal case (Crime No. 220 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant argued that the victim’s recorded …

ABHISHEK SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners challenged FIR No. 0219 of 2026 filed under sections of the B.N.S. 2023 and sought quashing of the FIR and a mandamus directing police not to arrest them. They prayed that the police follow the Supreme Court’s guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar. The State opposed the …

SHAHKAB AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Shahkab and five family members filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR lodged on 9 May 2026 under Sections 64(1), 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, arising from matrimonial discord with respondent No.4, the wife of petitioner No.1. The High Court …

SHUBHAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Shubham Yadav, was charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly threatening a 19‑year‑old woman with a false promise of marriage and attempting to coerce her. The FIR was lodged on 12 March 2026, but the appellant contended that …

SHIVAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shivam Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 18 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. The petitioner contended that the FIR was filed …

ARVIND GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Arvind Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 10‑08‑2026 registered under Sections 318(4) and 62 of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court examined the FIR and held that it disclosed a prima facie commission of offence, …

RAJ KISHORversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 191(2), 190, 191(3), 351(2), 109(1) and 115(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a criminal case. The counsel sought interim protection to appear before the trial court and apply for regular bail, and the State’s Additional …

NAUSHADversusSTATE OF U.P.

Naushad applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Crime No. 83 of 2024) alleging false implication and asserting that he was not the primary offender, which was identified as Mohammad Aasif alias Mohammad Sippa. He highlighted that no money had been transferred to his account and that a co‑accused, …

TAIYAB @ AMARUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Taiyab @ Amaruddin, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where he was initially named only in a general role in the FIR but later alleged to have caused grievous injury with a glass bottle. He argued that the FIR nomination was false and pointed to …

MANEENDRA NATH AND 1 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on behalf of two accused, Maneendra Nath and Amarendra Nath, who feared arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 3(5), 109, 333 and 352 of the …

ARVIND KUMAR SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged misappropriation of excess pension funds and a violation of Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant, an elderly and …

ROBIN PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Robin Pal, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case registered under Sections 305, 331(4) and 61(2)A of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that the FIR was initially lodged against unknown persons and his name surfaced only through a …

HARPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Harpal Singh, a 74‑year‑old accused in a case under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant argued that he had no prior conviction, was of advanced age, and that the injuries alleged …

HEERA LAL SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Heera Lal Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 29‑03‑2026, filed under sections of the B.N.S.-2023 and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, and also sought a mandamus directing the …

CHIRAGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Chirag, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with a case under Sections 191(2), 191(3) and 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that a FIR was falsely lodged by a 13‑year‑old boy under pressure from villagers. The applicant’s counsel …

RAJKUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rajkumar and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 23‑06‑2026 registered under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 118(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and to restrain their arrest. They made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the …

DILIP GIRI @ KARIYA AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 13.08.2026 registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and to restrain the police from arresting them. They also made an innocuous prayer that the police follow the Supreme Court's guidelines in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar before making any …

SANJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sanjay Kumar Gupta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 18 July 2026 under sections 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023, and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him. The State filed a charge‑sheet on 20 August 2026, after …

SMT LALPATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Smt Lalpati, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material to establish cruelty or a dowry‑death presumption, …

RAVIKANT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravikant Yadav under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. 2023. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR …

CHANDRAPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Chandrapal Singh filed an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482. He later sought to withdraw that application and instead move a regular bail application in the pending criminal case. The court, after hearing counsel, permitted the withdrawal and granted him liberty to file a regular …

VIJAY CHATURVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Vijay Chaturvedi filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 59 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 305(B), 317(2) and 317(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. He feared arrest and sought protection to appear …

SHIVAM PAL @ JWALA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shivam Pal @ Jwala Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No.53 of 2026) under Section 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police firing incident in which he sustained a gunshot injury. The applicant argued that he was a victim of cross‑fire and that …

POOJAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Pooja filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 16‑05‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 02‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 8767 of 2025 (State of U.P. v. Gulfam). The ground relied upon was that the charge sheet alleged offences …

HIMANSHU THAKURversusSTATE OF U.P.

Himanshu Thakur applied for bail in a case (Crime No.172 of 2026) involving eleven FIRs under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. The court noted that a co‑accused, Manisha Chauhan, had already …

RAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Ram Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of an FIR dated 12-06-2025 under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner alleged that the investigation was not being conducted in a fair and impartial manner. …

ASHOK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Ashok Kumar, who feared arrest in a session case involving alleged offences under several provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 16 and 17 of the Protection of …

MANMOHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Manmohan, filed a second bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31684 of 2026 concerning case Crime No. 500 of 2025, which involved charges under Sections 70(2), 137(2), 127(4), 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 5G and 6 of the P.O.C.S.O. Act, 2012. The first …

KAUSHIK MAZUMDARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Kaushik Mazumdar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0362 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 61(2) and 318(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 8, 10, 11, 13(3) and 13(5) of the Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024. The application was heard …

GULSHAN BHARGAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a certiorari to quash an FIR dated 22‑04‑2026 under Sections 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023 and a mandamus directing the State not to arrest him while the petition was pending. After arguments, the petitioner’s counsel …

PRAKASH DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prakash Dwivedi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officials to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 222 of 2025 under specific provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner …

AKRAM ALI ALIAS BHAMBU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 351(2) and 340(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 in a property fraud case. The applicants, Akram Ali alias Bhambu and Mahboob Ahmad, were not named in the FIR and were described as marginal witnesses to an …

ANKURversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ankur, filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act in connection with Crime No. 360 of 2026. He claimed the FIR was false, asserting that the incident involved no injury and that a co‑accused was …

SABIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sabir under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, in a case involving mutual violence that resulted in injuries to eleven persons. The applicant argued he had no criminal antecedents and that no specific role was assigned to him, citing …

RAJBIR SINGH TYAGI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the B.N.S., 2023, fearing arrest in a criminal case (Crime No. 380 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) of the same Act. The Attorney General objected, contending that the offences do …

RAVI KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ravi Kumar and Danveer, entered into an agreement to issue a series of cheques to the informant, but the informant lodged an FIR alleging criminal offences despite the agreement. The applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the B.N.S., 2023, claiming the dispute was …

SAMEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sameer, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, fearing arrest in a case involving mutual assault between two parties where 23 persons were named in the FIR. He argued that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role assigned, and possessed no …

KUMAIL ABBAS AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The first applicant, Kumail Abbas, had already been arrested, rendering his application infructuous, and it was dismissed. The second applicant, Hasan Raza, sought anticipatory …

NADEEM KHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Nadeem Khan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quash of FIR No. 272 of 2026 and a mandamus to prevent their arrest under sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the B.N.S. 2023 and the 3/4 D.P. Act. They prayed that the police, before making any arrest, …

RAMVATIversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ramvati, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under sections 85 and 80(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She applied for bail, arguing that there was no material to support a presumption of dowry death and that she had no prior criminal …

PREMCHANDARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Premchandar filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR dated 22‑11‑2025 under Sections 143(2) and 336(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a human‑trafficking case. The victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the same Act specifically …

NITIN NAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Nitin Nagar, a named accused in an FIR dated 24‑02‑2026 (Case Crime No. 23 of 2026), filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking (a) a certiorari to quash the FIR under Sections 103(1), 109, 191(3) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and (b) a mandamus directing the investigating …

Rupesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rupesh Kumar and Tuntun Tanti, sought relief from imminent arrest in a case (Munger Muffasil P.S. Case No. 412 of 2024) alleging assault with iron rods causing injuries under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that Rupesh struck the informant’s head …

Parwej Alam @ Prawej AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Parwej Alam, was arrested on 15 June 2025 in connection with FIR dated 14 June 2025 alleging a violent assault on an informant’s family, resulting in the death of the informant’s husband. The prosecution charged him under numerous sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner …

Umesh SamariversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

Umesh Samari was arrested on 18 October 2025 in connection with a case alleging that he inserted his finger into the private parts of a six‑year‑old girl. The petitioner sought bail, claiming a clean record and that the allegations were fabricated. The State and the informant opposed bail, …

Yugal Kumar @ Jugal Kumar @ Jugan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five residents of Balipur, sought relief fearing arrest in a police case (Sigori P.S. Case No. 7 of 2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (190, 191(2), 191(3), 117(2), 109, 303(2) and 351(2)). The prosecution alleged that the petitioners …

SUBHADRA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhadra Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and police to conduct a free, fair, and time-bound investigation of an FIR dated 19-12-2025 (Case Crime No. 0266 of 2025) under Sections 318(4), 324(4) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, …

MITHUN RIKASANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Mithun Rikasan, who was arrested under Section 143(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged child‑trafficking. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the children’s statements indicated they were taken to Punjab for …

MINTU ALIAS SHIVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

Mintu alias Shiva was arrested in connection with an assault that caused injury to the victim's right hand, under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 118(1) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. 2023. The FIR was lodged four days after the incident, and both the accused and the victim were found to be intoxicated at the …

Sonam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sonam Kumar, was implicated in a criminal case arising from a land dispute in which he and co‑accused allegedly assaulted the informant and his sons and allegedly stole Rs. 1 lakh. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the injuries were minor, there was no intent to cause …

ABHISHEK KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Abhishek Kumar and Dharmendra Yadav, applied for bail in a case arising from a land‑dispute‑related alleged assault (Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 26 of 2026). The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted an informant and his brother with a blunt instrument, causing head …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF UP

Shahrukh was arrested in Crime No. 693 of 2024 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 118(1) and 131 of the B.N.S. 2023 for allegedly causing gunshot and incised injuries to a victim. The FIR initially alleged that he and co‑accused Aamir fired a firearm, but the medical report later showed …

MANOHAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manohar Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 0195 of 2025) involving multiple offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 103(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The FIR and witness statement alleged a collective involvement of 13 persons, but did not assign a …

RAKESH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Rakesh Chandra filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police, Prayagraj, to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 0040 of 2024 under Sections 279 and 338 of the B.N.S., 2023, and to arrest the accused. The …

RAMESHWARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Rameshwar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking mandamus directing the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) to supervise and replace the investigating officer in Crime No. 19 of 2026, and to include his applications and affidavit in the investigation report, alleging …

AARTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Aarti Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to complete a fair and proper investigation into an FIR dated 05-10-2025 under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner alleged that the police were not …

DHARMENDRA SINGH @ ARJUN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Dharmendra Singh, was arrested for allegedly possessing counterfeit currency notes worth Rs.78,500 and filed a bail application in Crime No.14 of 2026 under Sections 178, 179, 180 and 182 of the B.N.S. 2023. He claimed he was falsely implicated, that the notes were planted, and that …

KUNWARPALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kunwarpal, who was named in FIR No. 136 of 2025 under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. 2023. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR assigned a general firing role to him while the specific …

BITTU KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Bittu Kumar, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting no abduction or sexual assault occurred and that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and …

ANKISH TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ankish Tripathi and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the FIR in Crime No. 0024 of 2025, alleging that no charge sheet had been filed. The court examined the police’s office report dated 27 April 2026, which indicated that a charge sheet (CS‑145/25) had indeed …

KRISH KEERWAL @ CHIRAGversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Krish Keerwal @ Chirag, who had been in custody since 31 March 2026 in connection with a case under Sections 109(1), 125, 191(2) and 190 of the B.N.S., 2023. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and had no …

VISHALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishal under Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 in Criminal Case No. 27 of 2026. The applicant claimed false implication in a flesh‑trade raid and argued that no woman or minor …

KAUSHAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kaushar Singh under Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that similarly situated co‑accused had already been released on …

Shamshad Ahmad @ Shamshad AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Shamshad Ahmad, filed a second anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 351(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleges that on 10 August 2024 the petitioner, armed with a licensed pistol, …

Madan RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Madan Ray was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute case (Shahpur Patori PS Case No. 496 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, including assault and causing grievous hurt. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, assaulted an informant …

Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Raushan Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (Sup. P.S. Case No. 431 of 2025) registered under several sections of the B.N.S. 2023. The FIR alleges that Raushan, along with co‑accused, abducted the informant’s brother at gunpoint and used a Scorpio vehicle, …

Sanjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, six members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with FIR No. 432 of 2025 filed under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging they attacked an informant with a lathi and iron rod, causing injury and assaulting her husband and son. They …

Yusuf Raeesh @ Md. Yusuf Rayees @ Isuf RayeesversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Chakia PS No.44 of 2026) alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2) and 351(2) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners and co‑accused assaulted an informant, inflicted a knife …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rahul Kumar sought relief fearing arrest in connection with PS Didarganj Case No. 222 of 2025, wherein he was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 74 read with 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged assault on an informant and his family. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and …

Alok KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Alok Kumar petitioned for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a cyber‑crime case registered under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. He asserted a clean antecedent and claimed that the informant, an employee of the cyber‑cafe, falsely implicated him. The State opposed the bail. The court …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rita Devi, mother of Shivam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S. 2023 alleging her involvement in the kidnapping of a minor girl. The informant claimed his daughter was abducted by Shivam Kumar, who was allegedly in a romantic …

Roshan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Roshan Kumar and Vishal Kumar were charged with murder under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 140(1), 61(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleged to have killed the deceased with a stone. Both petitioners have been in custody since August 2025. The prosecution presented CCTV footage and a …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS No 227 2025) alleged under sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 8 of the POCSO Act. He has been in custody since 7 December 2025 and claims a clean antecedent. The victim’s statement recorded …

Vishal Kumar @ Rider @ Gop JeeversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Roshan Kumar and Vishal Kumar, were charged with murder under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 140(1), 61(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that they killed the deceased with a stone. Both have been in custody since August 2025. The prosecution presented CCTV footage linking …

Md. Jalauddin @ Md. SahirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, aged 78 and 75, are the father‑in‑law and mother‑in‑law of a woman who was found hanged, and they were implicated in a dowry‑death case under Sections 103(1), 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing that they are senior citizens with clean …

Raja Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioners Raja Kumar Singh and Sonu Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Mohiuddin Nagar Case No.116/2025, which alleges offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. They contend they have been falsely implicated by the informant, arguing …

Manoj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Yadav was arrested in connection with a murder case (Paharpur PS Case No.378 of 2024) alleged to have been committed under sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner had been in custody since 1 April 2025 and sought bail. …

Mahendar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, a group of seven Yadavs, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging extortion, threats with a pistol, and offences under the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act. The informant claimed the accused intercepted him on 06.08.2024 and demanded Rs.5 lakh. The petitioners argued they were …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Kundan Kumar was arrested in connection with a gang rape case registered as Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case No. 200 of 2025 and has been in custody since 17 August 2025. He filed an application for bail, invoking Section 70(1) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, which the prosecution alleged was the …

SANJEEV KUMAR MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, his son Abhishek Kumar Mishra, wife Ruby Devi and daughter Khushi Kumari—sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS case No. 474 of 2025, wherein they were alleged to have assaulted an informant, his wife and daughter with iron rods and …

Vijesh Natversusthe state of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Vijesh Nat and Varjesh Nat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No. 219 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging they assaulted an informant and others during a boundary wall dispute. The FIR alleged that petitioner No.1 stabbed the …

Avinash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Avinash Kumar was arrested in connection with a firearm injury alleged to have been inflicted on an informant during a land dispute. He faced charges under sections 115(2), 126, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and sections 25(1‑b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. The petitioner argued that the case …

Ravi Mandal @ Ravi KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ravi Mandal, was arrested in connection with a case registered under sections 64 and 82(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging a sexual relationship with a minor under the pretext of marriage. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the …

Manish Ray @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manish Ray, the petitioner, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly assaulting a temple priest and a person named Satyam Roy. He contended that he was falsely implicated and that the injury to Satyam Roy was simple. The petitioner …

Subodh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Subodh Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS. Case No.308 of 2025) alleging assault and other offences under the B.N.S., 2023. He claims a clean record and asserts that the allegations stem from a dispute over video‑recording a religious puja, …

Santosh Yadav @ SantoshversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the parents and brothers of Ajit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Patliputra P.S. Case No.445/2025) under Sections 137(2), 96 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. They alleged that the case was false because the victim, who had eloped with Ajit, had …

Aplesh Yadav @ Apalesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellant, Aplesh Yadav, was charged under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) of the B.N.S. 2023, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(2v) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly firing on several persons and being part of an unlawful assembly that resulted in the death of an informant's husband. …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Deepak Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a cyber‑crime case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1582 of 2025) involving alleged loan‑fraud advertisements on Facebook. The prosecution’s case rests on a complaint about a suspicious mobile number, a search that led to the arrest of two …

Pintu Yadav @ Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Pintu Yadav was implicated in an FIR for illegal sand mining under Sections 305(e) and 317(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, based on an informant’s claim that the activity caused a loss of Rs.18 lakh to the government. The petitioner asserted that he has a clean antecedent, no sand or equipment …

Amit PatelversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Amit Patel applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 465 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 111, 61(2), 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the Arms Act and the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged that police intelligence linked Patel to a planned offence and that …

Shivam Kumar @ Vikram @ LaluversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Shivam Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (P.S. Case No. 368 of 2025) involving bomb attacks during an examination at B.N. College, Patna, which resulted in a student’s death. He is charged under Sections 109(1), 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

Vinod Ram @ Binod RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Vinod Ram and his wife Lalti Devi, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related murder case (Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 220 of 2025) filed under Sections 80, 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleges that the deceased, Rambha Devi, was killed after …

Raushan Kumar @ Prakash Kumar @ BaggaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Raushan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered as Belaganj P.S. Case No. 370 of 2025 under Section 304(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated. The prosecution alleged that two unknown persons stole a purse containing Rs. 2 lakh, and the petitioner’s …

Ravikant Kumar @ Chhotu SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ravikant Kumar, sought bail for offences under Sections 309(4), 61(2) and 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, relating to the alleged looting of a pick‑up van. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants, including the petitioner, stole the van, while the petitioner claimed innocence, …

Kisan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Kisan Singh and Shubham Singh, sought bail in a criminal case (Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 4 of 2026) alleging they were falsely implicated in assaults on an informant’s house over a property dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, along with co‑accused, entered the …

Ranjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Ranjay Yadav, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a case registered under Section 308(5) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he and co‑accused attempted extortion and fired at an informant. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner …

Ashwini Vatsya @ Ashwani VatsversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ashwini Vatsya and Awanish Vats, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 103, 61, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act. The informant alleged that his son Rahul was shot by Prem Shankar Jha and that the …

Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Gautam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being named in FIR No.34 of 2025 alleging offences under Section 69 of the B.N.S. 2023, Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, and Sections 3(1)(w) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR …

Arbind Ram @ Arvind RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Arbind Ram was arrested in connection with Maharajganj P.S. Case No. 176 of 2025, charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 118, 303(2), 351(1), 352, 109 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for allegedly assaulting an informant with an iron rod, causing a hair‑line fracture of the skull. He applied for bail, …

Jitendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jitendra Thakur, Shyamsundar Thakur and Golu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Barbigha P.S. Case No. 202 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners entered an informant's …

Ram Naresh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers from Sabnima village, sought bail after the police filed a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 61 of the B.N.S., 2023 in connection with a land dispute. The prosecution’s version claimed the land was originally purchased by …

Ajay yadavversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners Ajay Yadav, Durba Devi, Bablu Yadav and Champa Devi applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (Halsi P.S. Case No. 287 of 2025) involving offences such as assault, theft of jewellery and alleged outraging of modesty. During the pendency of the application, …

Bipin kumar sahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Bipin Kumar Sah and his son Suman Kumar sought bail after being implicated in a case alleging multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023, stemming from a neighbour dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the informant and his wife, causing simple injuries, while the …

Sudhakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sudhakar Kumar and Prabhat Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No.8 of 2026 filed under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging assault on a villager. The prosecution alleged that Sudhakar caused a grievous femur fracture while Prabhat allegedly …

Ashish Kumar Singh @ Mallu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ashish Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a dowry harassment case (Buxar Mahila P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025) alleging that he and his family demanded Rs. 5 lakh as dowry, tortured the informant Priya Rai, and evicted her from her matrimonial home. The petitioner contended that he was falsely …

Nitish Kumar Singh @ Tulli SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. 2023. The FIR alleges that he, along with others, assaulted an informant with a knife, causing bleeding to the informant's left hand. The …

Ram Kumar Yadav @ Ram Kumar @ Ram YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Kumar Yadav, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Kavaiya Case No. 201 of 2024) under Sections 190, 191, 103, 118, 238, 61(2), 62 and 123 of the B.N.S., 2023. He alleged that he is innocent, has no criminal antecedent, and that the investigation produced no material …

Mithilesh Kumar @ Mithun Tanti @ MithileshversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mithilesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a murder alleged to have been committed over a dowry demand, under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. He had been in custody since 20‑04‑2025 and a prior bail application had been rejected. The petitioner argued innocence and highlighted that …

Aakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Aakash Kumar was arrested in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 259 of 2025, alleged to have abducted a minor girl for the purpose of marriage. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner kidnapped the informant's minor daughter, while the petitioner claimed innocence, stating that he and the …

MITHUN PASWAN @ MITHUN KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Mithun Paswan was arrested in connection with a case where he allegedly fired a firearm, injuring three persons but causing no death. He faces charges under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, sought bail, arguing …

Suman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Suman Kumar, was charged with murder under several provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and the SC/ST Act, and his bail application was rejected by the Special Court. He contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that another individual, Ranjan, was the actual shooter and that …

Rahul Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Sharma, applied for bail in a criminal case (Baroon P.S. Case No. 20 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1), 3(5), and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The informant’s counsel alleged that the case pertained to the killing of the …

Madan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Madan Sharma was arrested in connection with a murder case (S.Tr. No. 700 of 2025) alleging that he tied and assaulted the husband of an informant, leading to the victim's death. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, asserting that the deceased had an illicit relationship with a …

Pramod Sao @ Pramod Shah @ Pramod SahversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pramod Sao, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 108 of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging his involvement in the suicide of his wife’s mother, Pramila Devi. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner had been assaulting the deceased for two years, leading to her …

Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioners, Rajendra Singh and co‑accused, applied for bail in a criminal case (Bagengola P.S. Case No. 109 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 190, 329(3), 115(2), 118, 117(2) and 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. Their earlier bail application had been rejected by this Court …

Pawan NatversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Pawan Nat, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging he was falsely implicated in a robbery where the informant’s gold items were seized at gunpoint. The prosecution alleged that seven persons on three motorcycles, including the …

Chhotu Gond @ Chhotelal GondversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chhotu Gond was arrested in connection with a raid that uncovered 100.920 litres of illicit foreign liquor, and he was charged under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed he was merely identified by a local chowkidar, that no incriminating material was found on him, …

Laliya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Laliya Devi was arrested for allegedly possessing 21.03 grams of heroin and her associate for 10.62 grams, offences under Sections 8(c), 21(b), 29 of the NDPS Act and Section 111(2)(b) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. She claimed innocence, argued that the quantity was only intermediate, …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023, based solely on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, as his name does not appear in the FIR. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, no material evidence …

Chandeshwar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, relatives of the informant, applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving assault and other offences under the B.N.S. 2023. Petitioner's No.1 was already in custody and his bail application was withdrawn. The court examined the FIR alleging that the petitioners, armed with …

Gopal DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Gopal Das and Moti Kumar sought bail in a criminal case (Kadirganj PS Case No. 181 of 2025) where they were alleged to have assaulted an informant with iron rods, causing a shoulder fracture and assaulting his family. The prosecution charged them under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The …

Md SamirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three brothers, sought bail fearing arrest in connection with a police case alleging assault under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The incident involved a dispute over a parked motorcycle, leading to an assault on the informant with lathis and fists. The petitioners argued …

Vishal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vishal Kumar was arrested on 14‑12‑2025 in connection with a case alleging that he attempted to have a physical relationship with an informant, offences being punishable under Sections 64(1), 62 and 351 of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and that the allegations were …

Kalim Parwez @ Kalim ParbejversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kalim Parwez was arrested in connection with a case registered on 06.01.2026 for alleged assault with a knife causing head injury, charged under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed a clean criminal record and argued that the FIR was delayed and the medical report did not …

Bipin kumar Yadav @ Bipin YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, three Yadav brothers, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Khajauli P.S. Case No.162 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023, including assault and grievous hurt. The prosecution’s informant claimed the petitioners entered his courtyard, tied a towel …

Deepak Madhesiya @ Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Madhesiya, sought bail fearing arrest in a case alleging offences under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, relating to the disappearance of an informant's son who had been employed in his sweet shop. The son went missing on 28‑08‑2025, but the FIR was only lodged …

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, was arrested in a case of alleged rape under Sections 64, 329(4) and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that he entered the victim's house at gunpoint, committed rape, and fled when the victim's husband arrived, after which he was detained. The …

Tausif Raza @ Tausif RajaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Tausif Raza, was arrested on 9 February 2026 in connection with Gopalganj Police Station Case No. 900 of 2024, FIR dated 12 December 2024, for offences punishable under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S., 2023. He was not originally named in the FIR; his name surfaced during investigation …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested on 14 October 2025 in connection with a murder case (S. Tr. No. 321 of 2026) under Sections 103(1), 238 and 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. He applied for bail, claiming a clean record and that the FIR was fabricated, noting a two‑day delay in filing the FIR. …

Manoj Kumar Mandal @ Munnu Mandal @ Mannu MandalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Manoj Kumar Mandal applied for bail in a murder case (Sabour P.S. Case No. 329 of 2024) under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that unknown persons murdered the informant's husband, and the petitioner’s name surfaced only through the confessional statement of …

Ritesh Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Ritesh Kumar Singh was charged under Section 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 for the alleged theft of an informant's bike. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants stole the bike, and a co‑accused, Boby Kumar, gave a confessional statement implicating the petitioner. The court noted that no …

Kaju Yadav @ Kaju Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Petitioner Kaju Yadav was arrested in connection with a case (Rajoun P.S. Case No. 619 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 308(2), 352, 351(2) and 3/5 of the B.N.S., 2023, involving threats, demand for a one‑lakh‑rupee ransom and alleged firing at an informant. The petitioner claimed …

Babul Kumar @ Rakesh RoshanversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Babul Kumar, was arrested in connection with a dowry‑death case (Singheshwar P.S. Case No. 236 of 2025) alleging cruelty, dowry demand, murder and attempted electrocution of Gunjan Kumari. The prosecution contended that the petitioner, along with the deceased's husband and in‑laws, …

Md. Monu @ Md. QadirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Monu (also known as Md. Qadir), sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Baligao PS Case No. 117 of 2025) involving alleged blockage of National Highway‑28, a bus fire and assault on the driver, with offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Bihar Control of the …

Banty JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Banty Jaiswal applied for bail in a case registered as Katihar Nagar P.S. Case No. 899 of 2025, wherein he was charged under Sections 310(4), 310(5), 132, 111 of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 35(1‑b)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a police raid, based on intelligence about a …

Md. Gulnaz Hussain @ Md. Gulnawaz Hussain @ FarooqueversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Md. Gulnaz Hussain, applied for bail in a case registered as Tajpur P.S. Case No. 179 of 2025, alleging offences under Sections 351(4) and 305 of the B.N.S., 2023. The prosecution alleged that unknown miscreants stole cash, jewellery and other articles worth approximately Rs. 75 lakh …

Sheikh Afroz @ Afroz AhmadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, five residents of Mathurapur, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 372 of 2025, which alleged assault during a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that petitioner No. 2 Noor Mohammad and others assaulted the informant and his brother, …

Vishal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vishal Yadav applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103(1), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the murder of an informant’s father. The prosecution’s case relied on the informant’s claim that several Yadavs, including the …

Prem Shankar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Prem Shankar Jha applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 103, 61, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly shooting the son of an informant at DMCH gate on 5 August 2025. The informant alleged that the shooting stemmed from a family dispute …

Jag Mohan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jag Mohan Kumar was arrested on 17 July 2025 in connection with an FIR dated 14 June 2025 alleging offences under the B.N.S. 2023 and the Arms Act, relating to the shooting of Kundan Kumar. The prosecution alleged that co‑accused persons fired at the victim, but the FIR did not specifically charge …

Brajesh MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Brajesh Mahto was arrested in connection with a case of assault with a sword that caused simple injury to the victim, charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. He applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and pointing out that the medical report …

Sujeet RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Sujeet Ram, was charged under Sections 103(1), 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for the alleged dowry‑related murder of his wife. He contended that he was falsely implicated, had no criminal record, and presented an alibi based on mobile tower data showing he was in Uttar Pradesh …

Chandan Mahto @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The Patna High Court considered two regular bail applications arising from the same police case (No. 126 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The first petitioner, Chandan Mahto, asserted that he had no role in the killing of the deceased, had a clean …

Surbhita Kumari @ Soni KumariversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Surbhita Kumari, the wife of a deceased man, was arrested in connection with a murder case (PS Case No. 408 of 2025) alleging her involvement in a conspiracy to kill her husband, including hiring hired killers and making payments via UPI. She applied for regular bail, claiming innocence, a clean …

Abhishek KumarversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking the release of his vehicle (registration BR-06GG-9755) that had been seized by the State of Bihar authorities in connection with a police case alleging offences under sections 303(2) and 317(2) AB of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 11 of the …

Jaj Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Jaj Kumar Jha, applied for regular bail under Section 80 of the B.N.S., 2023 in a case alleging he killed his wife. He claimed innocence, asserting the death was a suicide and that the post‑mortem report was pending, and highlighted his clean antecedents and eight months of custody. …

Jonha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Jonha Devi applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Isuapur Case No. 193 of 2025) alleging her involvement in the death of Sulekha Kumari, the informant's daughter. The prosecution alleged that the deceased was killed by Rajan Manjhi and his family, while the petitioner claimed innocence, asserting …

Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case registered under Sections 74, 76, 78, 351, 352, 79 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Section 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner sexually harassed and threatened a minor girl who was …

Sikandar Sao @ Sikandar Kumar Sao @ Sikendar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sikandar Sao, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving illegal mica mining by blasting, which resulted in the death of Basudeo Bhuiyan. The FIR, registered on 04-12-2024, alleged offences under Sections 303(2), 105, 111 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3, 4, 5 of …

Ashok Kumar Sharma @ Ashok SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Ashok Kumar Sharma and Binay Kumar Sharma, co‑villagers involved in a land dispute, were named in FIR No.879/2025 for alleged assault on an informant and his brother using a pistol butt and iron rod. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing the incident stemmed from the land dispute, …

Chutahru MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Four individuals (Chutahru, Buddhu, Sapen and Biren Mukhiya) sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Jadia PS Case No.94 of 2025) alleging multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023, including assault and grievous injury. The FIR, filed 28 days after the incident, alleged that the accused …

Pandev Sah @ Pandav Kumar @ Pandav SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pandev Sah, applied for bail in a criminal case (PS Case No. 08 of 2026) alleging kidnapping of a minor girl, the informant's daughter. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting that the victim voluntarily left with him, married him, and testified under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. …

Dilkhush RajversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dilkhush Raj and Kaushlendra Prasad, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Noorsarai Police Station Case No. 586 of 2025, which was registered under Sections 191(1), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 351(2) and 117(2) of the B.N.S. 2023. The FIR alleged that the accused, …

Chhotu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Chhotu Prasad, was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant's son with an iron rod and threatening the family, under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and a clean criminal record, and alleging false implication. The State …

Pramod SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

Petitioner Pramod Sah was named in FIR No. 547 of 2025 for allegedly murdering the son of an informant and hanging the body. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming innocence, lack of eyewitnesses, and that the FIR does not specifically allege his involvement. The State opposed the bail, …

Ram Bilash Yadav @ Ram Bilas YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ram Bilash Yadav sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that he and others threw garbage in a lane, leading to a scuffle and injuries, invoking sections 352, 351(2), 303(2), 109(1), 118(1), 76 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner claimed innocence, stating he had …

Mantu ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mantu Manjhi sought bail after being implicated in a dispute over passage that escalated into a physical altercation, resulting in FIR No.315/2025 alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. Both parties filed FIRs against each other, and medical evidence showed the injuries to be …

Upendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Upendra Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and section 27 of the Arms Act. The allegations against him were described as general and omnibus, and he had been in custody since 9 January 2026. He applied for bail, …

Bharat YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bharat Yadav, Santosh Kumar and Ram Kailas Yadav, were arrested on 3 December 2025 in connection with a land‑dispute‑related assault and charged under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. They applied for bail before the Patna High Court, arguing that there is a counter‑case and …

Sandip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sandip Kumar, was arrested on 26‑12‑2025 in connection with a dowry‑related torture case filed under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023. He is the husband of the informant and faces charges including sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5). A …

Pappu Mahto @ Pappu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Pappu Mahto, applied for bail in a case registered as Bhagwanpur Haat P.S. Case No.244 of 2025, alleging that he and others killed the daughter of an informant over a dowry demand. The offence is punishable under sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner has been in …

Manjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Manjay Kumar was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 3 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he repeatedly struck the victim with a knife causing grievous injury. The petitioner applied for regular bail, claiming innocence and …

Golu Pandey @ Vikesh Kumar Pandey @ Galu PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Golu Pandey, was accused of multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023 arising from an altercation over irrigation of agricultural land on 23 July 2025, during which he allegedly fired a pistol (which misfired) and assaulted the informant with the butt of the pistol, causing a head …

BHOLA RAJBHARversusThe State of Bihar

REJECTED

The petitioner, Bhola Rajbhar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging that he was falsely implicated in the death of his wife's younger daughter over a dowry demand. He claimed a clean antecedent and that the FIR was fabricated. The State …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rohit Kumar sought anticipatory bail after a complaint (No. 577 of 2024) alleged that he and others assaulted his wife and demanded dowry, invoking Section 85 of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated, claiming the complaint was a …