Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR dated 8 September 2026 registered under sections of the B.N.S. Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, and asked that they not be arrested. The petitioners also prayed that the police follow the Supreme …
The Allahabad High Court considered four related bail appeals filed under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act by Rakesh Kumar, Vipin, Aman Kumar @ Tagharu and Rajendra Tiwari, who were accused of assaulting Kuldeep, who later died. The FIR was …
The petitioners, Dauli and her husband, are adults who married on 16 January 2026. The father of the first petitioner, a respondent, filed an FIR on 28 October 2025 under Section 87 of the B.N.S. Act, 2023, alleging that the husband had abducted his daughter. The petitioners contended that the FIR …
Manish Kumar was arrested in connection with a kidnapping allegation under Section 96 of the B.N.S. Act, 2023, accused of abducting the minor daughter of an informant. The petitioner claimed innocence, cited a clean record, and argued that the victim’s statement indicated she had voluntarily eloped …
The petitioners, Shobhlal Mahto and Pooja Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several provisions of the B.N.S. Act, 2023 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act, alleging they were falsely implicated in a kidnapping‑rape incident involving a minor. They argued that the …
The petitioners, three brothers, were implicated in a case involving the seizure of 147.78 litres of foreign liquor and five cartridges, alleged to violate sections of the BNSS Act, 2023, the Arms Act, 1959 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. They argued that the only basis for …
