Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
81 judgments · newest first · showing 1–81
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish Yadav, who is charged under Section 80(2) of the CrPC, Section 85 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No. 160 of 2025. The applicant argued that the prosecution’s key witnesses – the deceased’s …
Meena Nishad, the mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, lacking any material showing she harassed the deceased for dowry, and …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra and Durgadeen, brothers‑in‑law of a deceased, in Criminal Case No. 130 of 2026 under Section 108 of the B.N.S. Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely implicated, pointing out a five‑month delay between the …
The applicant, Rasheed Khan, filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 28 of 2025) seeking relief under Section 482 and several provisions of the B.N.S. Act. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, submitted that a final report had already been filed …
The applicants, Hasib Salmani and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 7502 of 2025) arising out of Crime No. 237 of 2024, which involved offences under sections 85, 115(2), …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. After hearing, the applicants sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Aditya Kumar Jha, who was arrested in a case alleging an attempt to commit rape under Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act and Sections 62 and 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed false implication, asserted that the 17‑year‑old victim was …
The applicant, Amit @ Ravi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the Upper Sessions Judge in a POCSO case. The applicant contended that he was already on bail when the NBW was issued and that the warrant was passed without first …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet and related proceedings, claiming they were falsely implicated and that the parties had amicably resolved their dispute. The State did not object to a compromise being filed in the trial court. The …
Smt. Urmila filed an anticipatory bail application under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act in a criminal case. She later requested to withdraw this application and instead seek regular bail before the trial court. The State, represented by the A.G., raised no …
Vimla Devi, the mother‑in‑law of a deceased woman, applied for bail in a case originally filed under Sections 85, 80(2) of the B.N.S. Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act, which was later amended to charge her under Section 108 and Section 92 of the B.N.S. Act for alleged abetment to suicide. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Atul Yadav, husband of a deceased woman, who was charged under Section 108 of the B.N.S. Act for alleged abetment of suicide. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged five days after the alleged incident, that the post‑mortem showed death due …
The applicant, Vijay Keshsharwani, a father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide after a domestic dispute, was charged under Sections 85 and 80 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations of dowry harassment were unfounded, that there was …
An FIR was lodged against Omkar and eight others under sections 69, 123, 351(2) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accused filed a writ petition seeking quash of the FIR, and the High Court ordered mediation, directing a deposit of Rs.25,000 and prohibiting any …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in a case where they were charged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 118(2) of the B.N.S. Act. They contended that the charge under Section 118(2) was unwarranted because the injuries sustained were not grievous, and that …
Nitesh Kumar applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 385 of 2026, charged under multiple sections of the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act. The applicant had no prior criminal record, and a co‑accused, Tejas Pal, had already been released on bail in a similar case. The court …
The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and all proceedings in Criminal Case No. 52021 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 308(4) and 351(2) of the BNSS. A compromise between the parties had been reached and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash the cognizance, charge sheet and all proceedings in State v. Nitish Hitaishi (Case No. 25014/2024) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party, which was verified by the trial court. …
The petitioner, Mahendra Chaudhary, filed a writ petition challenging an FIR dated 27 July 2026 that alleged offences under Sections 69, 77 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, the alleged relationship with the informant was consensual, and the FIR …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mahesh Prasad, who was arrested in a case under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, had consented to the relationship …
The petitioner, Indrajeet Kumar Gond, challenged disciplinary proceedings and a criminal case filed against him under sections of the B.N.S. Act and the Arms Act. He argued that the simultaneous proceedings violated principles of natural justice. The High Court, relying on its earlier decision in …
The applicants, Jugendra and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 22‑03‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 04‑12‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 3202 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged – Sections …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking quash of FIR No. 285/2025, alleging that the complaint was malicious, delayed, and that the alleged victim was an adult. The applicant's counsel argued that no offence was made out and that the proceedings were a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra Singh Yadav in a case registered as Crime No. 91 of 2026 under Sections 316(2), 3(5), 61(2) and 108/56 of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the alleged offence under Section 108 B.N.S. – which …
The applicant Manoj filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (State vs Manoj) pending before the Special Judge under the PAKSO Act. The application was based on a settlement agreement dated 19 June 2026 between the parties, which had …
The applicant, Samvati, mother‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide after a domestic dispute, was charged under Sections 80(2) and 85 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She contended that she was falsely implicated, that there was no material to establish a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑07‑2026 and the entire criminal proceeding (complaint case No. 17264/2024) that arose from a matrimonial dispute. The court observed that the dispute appears to be amenable to …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ramlakhan, who was arrested in connection with a case registered as Crime No.354 of 2025 under Sections 137(2), 87, 64 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the …
The applicants Bhupendra and others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 24‑12‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 26‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No.84 of 2025. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 351(2) and …
Vishal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 725 of 2025) involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 61(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, asserting that the alleged victim, a 17‑year‑old, was a consenting party who voluntarily married …
The applicant Mahesh Kumar Bhardwaj filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking quash of the charge sheet and the pending criminal trial (Session Trial No. 53 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 74, 75(1)(i) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar Saini, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑10‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 11‑12‑2024 in a case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar. The …
The applicant, Rinku @ Abhay Kumar, was charged under Sections 137(2) of the CrPC, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4(2) of the POCSO Act in Crime No. 275 of 2025. He filed a second bail application after the first was rejected. The counsel for the applicant failed to present any new ground …
The applicant, Smt. Sunita Devi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 951/2026) and the related charge sheet and cognizance order. The High Court examined the material and observed that the dispute centered on questions …
Gulab Yadav applied for bail in a case involving alleged offences under sections 85, 89, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act, sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act and section 67 of the I.T. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged 1.5 months after the alleged incident, …
Hemang Bhadreshbhai Pathak was arrested in connection with an FIR (C.R. No. 11203055250397 of 2025) for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and the B.N.S. Act. He filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the BNSS, claiming confinement since 30‑03‑2026 and asserting that he …
Vashrambhai Ramjibhai Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 11996006260457 alleging offences under Sections 140(3), 64(2)(m), 123, 351(3) and 54 of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior record and that custodial …
The applicant, Khadak Singh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 140 of 2024) alleging offences under several IPC sections, the B.N.S Act and the POCSO Act. The Special Judge (POCSO) had already concluded the trial and delivered a conviction on 30 September 2025. The State's brief …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (chargesheet no. A-383/24) in Crime No.0465 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under several sections of the B.N.S. Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the …
The petitioner, a bootlegger, was preventively detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 on 13 April 2026 (detention effected on 30 April 2026). He challenged the detention, arguing that his alleged offences relate only to law and order and do not affect public order …
Satish Yadav, husband of a woman who died under suspicious circumstances, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No.174 of 2025) alleging that his wife committed suicide by ingesting aluminium phosphide. The applicant argued that the post‑mortem viscera report and the hostile statements of the …
The applicant Kallu @ Saurav filed a bail application in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 15534 of 2026, seeking release in a case (Crime No. 90 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 109(1), 191(2), 190 of the IPC and Section 117(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant contended that he was …
The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a murder‑related case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) where a charge‑sheet had already been filed. The applicant claimed false implication, arguing that the FIR initially listed Sections 115(2), 140(1), 109 B.N.S. and later added …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Faheem Uddin, who was charged under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act for alleged forgery and related offences. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, noting that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Navi, who was charged under Sections 65(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident, that the victim’s statement under …
The applicant, Ram Sharan, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No.44 of 2024) under Sections 80(2), 85 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act, alleging a delayed FIR and lack of criminal history. The High Court noted that the FIR was filed promptly, the victim died within the …
The applicant, Premlata, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking permission to appear for trial without being taken into physical custody in a criminal case involving offences under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 66D of the I.T. Act. The applicant argued that he had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shadab, accused in Crime No. 90 of 2025 under Sections 109(1), 352 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 4 and 5 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the key witnesses had turned hostile …
The applicant, Ritik Kumar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order dated 23 March 2026 passed by the District Magistrate of Mau in Criminal Case No. 2303 of 2025. The impugned order related to offences under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Animal …
Mehboob Alam filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 23‑02‑2026 of the Additional District & Session Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) which formally framed charges against him under Section 74, Section 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. The revisionist argued that …
Ram Nain Yadav and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 627 of 2024 under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the Court; …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Jitendra @ Jeetu Savita, husband of a deceased woman, in a case (Crime No. 0201 of 2025) alleging abetment of suicide under Sections 85 and 108 of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant argued that the death was due to …
The applicant, Snehansh Upadhyay, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from FIR No.126 of 2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 30‑08‑2024 under Section 305 BNSS, as well as a summoning order dated 17‑02‑2025. The applicant and the second …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case registered as Dhanarua P.S. Case No. 608/2025, where he is accused, along with two others, of gang rape under Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 64(1) and 70(2) of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely …
Gopi Mahto was arrested after police recovered 13.8 kg of ganja from his backpack in a case under Section 111(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and several provisions of the NDPS Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, alleging procedural violations of Section 105 of the BNSS Act and that the …
Ritik Kumar was arrested in connection with the murder of Shubham Kumar, alleged under sections 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act. The prosecution alleged a love‑triangle motive, with Amit Kumar and Khushi Kumari as primary conspirators, and claimed the petitioner participated in the assault …
Nandu Prasad, the father‑in‑law of the deceased, applied for bail in a dowry‑death case (Giriyak P.S. Case No. 428 of 2025) registered under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act. The prosecution alleged that the victim was tortured and killed for non‑payment of dowry, while the petitioner …
The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, applied for bail in a case (Sugauli P.S. Case No. 522/2025) involving offences under Sections 111, 317(4), 317(5) read with 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act, relating to the disposal of stolen two-wheelers. The prosecution alleged that a large number of two-wheelers were …
The petitioners, Suman Mahto and Jetan (Jitan) Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in two separate criminal miscellaneous proceedings concerning alleged offences under the Excise Act and various provisions of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and the Arms Act. They argued that they were …
Dr. Nafees applied for bail in a case where he was not named in the FIR but was later mentioned in a second statement, with only a vague role assigned. The alleged incident involved minor injuries to two persons and there is no corroborative evidence linking the applicant to the offences. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Katheriya in Criminal Case No. 197 of 2025, which was registered under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated on the basis of a suspect statement by the …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Om Prakash, who was arrested in connection with Crime No. 137 of 2025 under multiple IPC sections and the B.N.S. Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that an informant had exonerated him and co‑accused, and highlighted a …
The applicant, Deepak Raidas, was arrested under sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 5 and 6 of the Poxos Act in connection with an alleged love‑affair‑related offence. He contended that the accusation was false, that both he and the alleged victim are adults who love each …
The revisionist, Chhote Lal Maurya, filed a criminal revision challenging the order dated 12‑08‑2025 of the Additional District and Sessions Judge which rejected his application for a CBI investigation into the murder of his son. The original investigation had exonerated three accused (Vinod Singh, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 11‑01‑2026, the cognizance order dated 07‑02‑2026, and the entire proceedings of Case No. 400 of 2026 arising from Crime No. 566 of 2025. The FIR alleged offences under …
Vicky Patel was arrested in connection with a case of alleged assault that resulted in the death of the informant's brother‑in‑law. The charge under Section 103(1) of the B.N.S. Act was based on an FIR dated 17‑09‑2025, but the petitioner contended that the FIR was fabricated and that the …
The petitioners, Sanjay Rai and Premchand Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a murder‑related case (PS Case No.156 of 2024) alleging assault under sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the FIR lacked …
The petitioners, Sanjay Rai and Premchand Ray, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a murder‑related case (PS Case No.156 of 2024) alleging assault under sections 103(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. Act. They contended that they were falsely implicated, that the FIR lacked …
The petitioner, Dhanu Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Kateya No.242/2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Narcotic Substances (B.N.S.) Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the victim, while …
The petitioner, Anil Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving multiple offences under the B.N.S. Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He alleged that he was falsely implicated based on the testimony of a chawkidar, despite having nine prior cases, and claimed he would …
Raja Kumar petitioned for bail in Sessions Trial No. 138 of 2025 concerning an alleged kidnapping of a minor, charged under Section 140(2) of the B.N.S. Act. The prosecution’s case is based on a forced confessional statement, with the petitioner not named in the FIR, no incriminating material …
The petitioners, laborers engaged in loading prohibited liquor, were arrested under several provisions of the Gujarat Prohibition Act and the B.N.S. Act. They filed an application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail before the charge‑sheet was …
The petitioners, three young students, were arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the B.N.S. Act alleging kidnapping of a minor girl. The father of the girl reported her missing, and the prosecution alleged the petitioners abducted her with intent to take …
Applicants filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR C.R. No.11209041251005 of 2025 registered at Prantij Police Station, Sabarkantha, for offences under various sections of the B.N.S. Act and Section 135 of the Gujarat …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, was arrested in a cyber‑crime case (Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 1582 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 340(2) & 111(2)(b) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, for allegedly …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Muffasil P.S. Case No. 370 of 2025) under several sections of the B.N.S. Act for allegedly forcing entry into an informant's house and assaulting family members. He contended that the FIR was false, motivated …
Phool Kumari was arrested in connection with a case involving assault with an iron rod and the death of an informant's father. The prosecution alleged that she, along with co‑accused, participated in the assault, charging her under several sections of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner argued that she …
Ajay Kumar was arrested in a vigilance case alleging that he demanded Rs.1 lakh from an informant for salary payments and received Rs.60,000, violating sections 7(a), 7(c) and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. Act. The petitioner claimed innocence, citing …
The petitioner, Bablu Kumar Gupta, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging that he harassed and threatened a woman with rape, kidnapping, and defamation via phone calls and social media. The petitioner contended that the FIR was filed on mere suspicion, that no overt act occurred, and that he …
The petitioner, Solu Kumar (also known as Ashik), was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 139 and 87 of the B.N.S. Act, based on an informant's allegation that his niece had gone missing after being seen with the petitioner. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner’s …
The petitioner, Md. Samir Khan, sought bail in a case registered under Section 309(6) of the B.N.S. Act concerning alleged robbery and assault. The prosecution alleged that the accused fired on the informant and stole cash and jewellery, but the petitioner was not named in the FIR and his name …
