Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The dispute concerned whether Site Nos. 432 and 433 in Survey No. 15/1 were acquired by the Government under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and, consequently, whether an injunction could be granted to restrain construction. The trial court rejected the injunction without examining if the …
The plaintiff, B. Leela Vathi, claimed ownership of a property alleging that the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) had executed a sale deed in favour of the appellant, Honnamma, without issuing a show‑cause notice under Section 64 of the BDA Act and that she had acquired title by adverse …
The Supreme Court examined whether the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) could lawfully sell a 1‑acre‑20‑guntas plot to Printers (Mysore) Ltd. for setting up a printing industry. The Court held that Section 38 of the BDA Act confers unrestricted power to lease, sell or transfer property unless …
The H.M.T. House Building Co‑operative Society, a housing society for HMT employees, submitted a scheme to the Karnataka Government and entered into an agreement with a construction firm (respondent No.11) to secure acquisition of land for its members. The State issued notifications under Sections …
