Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Banking and Negotiable Instruments Act

4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4

AKSHAY CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF U.P.

Akshay Chaudhary applied for bail in a criminal case involving multiple offences under the IPC, the Banking and Negotiable Instruments Act and the Income Tax Act. He argued that a co‑accused, Ashwani Jadaun, with an identical role and no prior record had been granted bail, and therefore parity …

SUNILBHAI MANUBHAI PATELversusBABUBHAI PASHABHAI PARMAR

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The original complainant, Sunilbhai Patel, appealed against the acquittal of Babubhai Parmar by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, invoking his right as a victim under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure Code for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The …

SANJAY JAYPRAKASH TIWARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 378 of the CrPC. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, is entitled …

SANJAY JAYPRAKASH TIWARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The appellant, Sanjay Jayprakash Tiwari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC against the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. …