Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial v. A. …
The original complainant under Section 378(4) of the CrPC sought leave to appeal against the acquittal of accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Surat. The High Court considered the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. After a recent decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) clarifying a victim's right …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court …
The complainant filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC seeking leave to appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The applicant later sought to withdraw the application, relying on a recent Gujarat High Court …
