Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

JAYANT VERMA & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2018 INSC 15916 February 2018Directions issued

The petition challenged the constitutional validity of Section 21A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, which bars courts from reopening bank loan transactions on the ground of excessive interest. The petitioners argued that the provision violated Article 14 and undermined State Debt Relief Acts that provide relief to

BHAVESH D. PARISH AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

2000 INSC 32512 May 2000Dismissed

The petitioners, shroffs who operated as unincorporated firms providing credit and accepting public deposits, challenged the constitutionality of Section 45‑S of the Reserve Bank of India Act (as amended in 1997) which prohibits such entities from accepting deposits. They argued that the provision violated Articles 19(

T. VELAYUDHAN ACHARI AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

1993 INSC 465 February 1993Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Chapter III‑C of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 (Section 45S and Section 58B(5A)) introduced by the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act, 1983, which limit the number of depositors an individual, firm or unincorporated association may accept and prescribe a two‑yea

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search