Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 378(4) of the CrPC. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial …
The original complainant, a victim of a cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a …
The original complainant, Prakash Pritamdas Ramnani, appealed under Section 378 of the CrPC against the acquittal of the accused by the trial court in a case involving a cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case involving dishonour of a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …
Abdul Sattarbhai Yusufmiya Malek, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by filing a petition under Section 378 of the CrPC. The Gujarat High Court examined whether a complainant, deemed a victim under Section …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 CrPC (or Section 413 …
