Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bar Council of India Rules, 1975

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

HIMALAYAN CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETYversusBALWAN SINGH

2015 INSC 36929 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The Himalayan Co‑operative Group Housing Society expelled several members, including Balwan Singh, for defaulting on deposit payments. The expulsion was approved by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies and upheld by the Revisional Authority. The respondents approached the High Court under Articles 226/227 seeking to

KOKKANDA B. POONDACHA AND OTHERSversusK.D. GANAPATHI AND ANR.

2011 INSC 14722 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a partition suit and the respondents later applied under Order XVI Rule 1(1) and (2) read with Section 151 of the CPC to file a list of witnesses, naming the appellants' advocate, N.R. Karnath, as a witness. The trial court allowed the list but rejected the request to summon the advocate because no

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIAversusA.K. BALALJI AND ORS.

2018 INSC 23513 March 2018Disposed off

The Bar Council of India appealed against orders allowing foreign law firms and lawyers to operate in India, arguing that the Advocates Act, 1961 restricts the practice of law to advocates enrolled with the Bar Council, covering both litigation and non‑litigation work. The Supreme Court examined whether foreign entitie

O.P. SHARMA & ORS.versusHIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

2011 INSC 3679 May 2011Disposed off

Advocates O.P. Sharma and others verbally abused and threatened a Judicial Magistrate in a Faridabad court, using filthy language and slogans. The High Court, acting suo motu, convicted them of criminal contempt under s.2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and sentenced them to simple imprisonment and fine. The adv

A.S. MOHAMMED RAFIversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU REP. BY HOME DEPT. AND ORS.

2010 INSC 8516 December 2010Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the legality of resolutions passed by various Bar Associations refusing to represent certain accused persons in criminal cases. It held that every individual, irrespective of the nature of the alleged crime, has a constitutional right to be defended and that it is the lawyer's duty to accept

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search