Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941

18 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusO.P. LODHA AND ANR.

1997 INSC 33531 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent firm, M/s Prakash Trading Corporation, sold goods both on its own account and as a commission agent for 24 disclosed principals. The Commercial Tax Officer assessed sales tax under Section 6‑B of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 on the firm’s total turnover, including the commission sales. The We

SUPREME PAPER MILLS LTD.versusASSTT. COMMNR. COMMERCIAL TAXES CALCUTTA & ORS.

2010 INSC 16725 March 2010Dismissed

Supreme Paper Mills Ltd., a paper manufacturer, filed sales tax returns and paid taxes under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The Commercial Taxes Department later issued a show‑cause notice under section 11E(2) alleging that the company had furnished incorrect turnover statements and proposing to reopen the d

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusROAD TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION, SILGURI AND ANR.

2003 INSC 11925 February 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal and its Commissioner of Commercial Taxes appealed against a West Bengal Taxation Tribunal order that had suspended Explanation‑I to Section 2(1a‑1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 and declared sub‑sections 6 and 7 of Section 4C and Rule 48L(4) of the Sales Tax Rules unconstitutional

CALCUTTA IRON MERCHANTSversusCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ANR.

1996 INSC 30623 February 1996Disposed off

The case concerned dealers of iron and steel who, under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, were required to transport goods with a declaration signed by the consignor as mandated by Rule 89A(2). The dealers contended that the rule unfairly placed the burden of producing the declaration on them while sellers were

KRISHAN CHANDER DUTIA (SPICE) PVT. LTDversusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1994 INSC 8923 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.C.D. Pvt. Ltd., bought whole black pepper and whole turmeric in West Bengal, ground them into powder, and sold the powder. It argued that under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954, the powdered forms are the same goods as the whole forms, already taxed at the first point of sale, and therefore not liab

BHAI JASPAL SINGH AND ANR.versusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ORS.

2010 INSC 72222 October 2010Dismissed

The appellant, a small‑scale fruit‑processing unit, claimed exemption from West Bengal sales tax on the basis of Notification No. 1428‑FT dated 26‑May‑1994, asserting that its investment in plant and machinery was below Rs.5 lakhs after accounting for depreciation. The assessing authority held that the investment excee

SUN OIL COMPANY (P) LTD. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

1998 INSC 37622 September 1998Dismissed

Sun Oil Company Ltd., a registered dealer and small‑scale industry, obtained a certificate under Section 4‑AA of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954 exempting it from "tax" for the period 14‑Jan‑1980 to 14‑Jan‑1985. Despite this, the company was assessed a turnover tax under Section 4‑AAA for part of the assessment yea

NORTHERN INDIA CATERERS (INDIA) LTD.versusLT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI

1979 INSC 27421 December 1979Dismissed

Northern India Caterers (India) Ltd., which runs a hotel and restaurant, challenged a Delhi sales‑tax assessment on the ground that meals served to casual diners were taxable as a sale. The Supreme Court had earlier held that such service was not a sale because diners could not take away unconsumed food and the transac

THE INDURE LTD. AND ANOTHERversusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

2010 INSC 62320 September 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Indure Ltd. was awarded a turnkey contract by NTPC to erect an ash‑handling plant. To fulfil the contract it imported MS pipes and other components, which were sold to NTPC. The company claimed exemption from sales tax under Section 5(2) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, arguing that the sale was in the course of imp

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.versusM/S. BISWANATH JHUNJHUNWALA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 90520 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Commercial Tax Officer sought to reopen sales‑tax assessments of Biswanath Jhunjhunwala for the assessment years Chaitra Sudi 2023‑24, which had been finalized in early 1969. Under the original Rule 80(5)(ii) of the Bengal Sales Tax Rules, such assessments could be reopened only within four years. A 1974 amendment,

MOULIN ROUGE PVT. LTD.versusTHE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1997 INSC 72712 November 1997Dismissed

Moulin Rouge Pvt Ltd, a restaurant that provides food, drinks and various services without separately charging for the food, was assessed sales tax and penalty for the years 1974-77 by the Commercial Tax Officer. The company relied on two Supreme Court judgments—Associated Hotels (1972) and Northern India Caterers (197

M/S. K.B. TEA PRODUCT PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, SILIGURI & ORS.

2023 INSC 53012 May 2023Matter referred to larger bench

The appellants, K.B. Tea Product Pvt. Ltd. and others, set up small‑scale units for blended tea under a tax‑holiday scheme that exempted manufacturers from sales tax under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994. The scheme was based on the then‑existing definition of "manufacture" which included "blending of tea". In Augu

COOCH BEHAR CONTRACTORS' ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

1996 INSC 104011 September 1996Dismissed

The appellants, contractors engaged in civil construction works for government departments, were assessed under Section 6‑D of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. They challenged the assessment on four grounds: denial of declaration forms allegedly violating Article 14, inclusion of the value of stores and materi

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER & ORS.versusSTATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.

2016 INSC 10068 November 2016Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered whether the State Bank of India (SBI), acting on a Reserve Bank of India (RBI) directive to purchase Exim scrips (formerly replenishment licences) at a 20% premium and subsequently cancel them, was liable to purchase tax under the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The revenue argued tha

CALCUTTA JUTE MANUFACTURING CO. AND ANR.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1997 INSC 5328 July 1997Dismissed

The appellants, Calcutta Jute Manufacturing Co. and others, were assessed a turnover tax under Section 6‑B of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 after their challenge to the provision’s constitutional validity was rejected. While they paid the tax, the West Bengal government later introduced Section 10‑A imposing

STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusE.I.T.A. INDIA LTD. AND ORS.

2003 INSC 1505 March 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal challenged the constitutional validity of several provisions of the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1994 and its 1995 Rules, including Section 2(6), the explanation to Section 11, and Section 14(4), as well as Rules 172, 173, 174, 188 and 189. The respondents argued that these provisions created a s

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search