Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
11 judgments · newest first · showing 1–11
The applicant-wife filed an application seeking transfer of a marriage petition (No. A-1863 of 2025) pending before the Family Court in Mumbai to the Family Court at Ahilyanagar, where she resides and has instituted related criminal and maintenance proceedings. The court noted the 250 km distance …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Akaram, who is charged under Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 1.2 kg of charas. The applicant …
The petitioners, three brothers from Sugauli, were implicated in a case alleging armed intimidation of an informant’s husband under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that the accused arrived armed, sought information, and that one …
The petitioners, members of the same family, were accused of murdering the informant’s sister, allegedly by assault with lathi and danda, though the post‑mortem indicated death by hanging. Petitioners 2‑6 withdrew their bail application and sought regular bail, which the court permitted. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Bhupendra Patel who was charged under Sections 8, 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 28.135 kg of ganja recovered …
The petitioner, Dipu Kamat, is the registered owner of a motorcycle from which 108 litres of foreign liquor was seized. He was not named in the FIR and claims no knowledge of the seizure, arguing that the open location of the motorcycle precludes liability and that the search violated mandatory …
Sudhir Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS Madhepur Case No.150 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 308(2) and 308(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR claimed that Mukhiya and others extorted …
The petitioners, Md. Azad and Md. Jamir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that they were part of an unlawful mob that fired on an informant, but the specific charge …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, was arrested in a case alleging that he enticed a minor girl, the informant’s daughter, and later married her. The FIR listed offences under Sections 137(2), 96, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and later added Section 8 of the POCSO …
The petitioner, Dharamraj Kumar, was arrested after police recovered a loaded country-made pistol from his waist during an orchestra program, leading to charges under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He applied for regular bail, contending that the search and seizure violated the mandatory …
The petitioners, four brothers, sought pre‑arrest bail in a case alleging assault, robbery and other offences under various sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha (BNS). The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted the informant with weapons, causing injuries and looting Rs.4,000. The …
