Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petitioner, Sunil Kahar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Kudhani P.S. Case No. 01 of 2026) under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha (B.N.S.). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the …
Petitioner Chintu Kumar sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case (Town P.S. No. 153 of 2025) alleging abduction of a minor under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The prosecution claimed he abducted the informant’s daughter, while the petitioner asserted …
The petitioner, Md. Arbaj, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 11.415 litres of Nepali liquor from a motorcycle registered as BR32AB 3734. The petitioner claimed he was the former owner of the motorcycle, having sold it on …
The petitioners, Sajan Kumar Yadav and Shambhu Yadav, were involved in a family quarrel that escalated into physical assaults, leading to charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.). Petition 1 withdrew his anticipatory bail application, while Petition 2 sought …
