Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita

216 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

ARUNA JAGDISH THAKAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISMISSED

The applicant, Aruna Jagdish Thakare, lodged a police report for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, leading to a charge‑sheet filed before the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon. She filed a criminal application …

RAJU MANSINGH RATHOD AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Raju Mansingh Rathod, Sanjay Harishchandra Phoke and Sachin Gabru Rathod in connection with two FIRs alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, cheating, criminal …

SACHIN GABRU RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Raju Mansingh Rathod, Sanjay Harishchandra Phoke and Sachin Gabru Rathod in connection with two FIRs alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, cheating, criminal …

SUMAN NANABHAU BEDRE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The mother‑in‑law, father‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the informant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash FIR No. 1349 of 2024 and the subsequent charge‑sheet for offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 read with Section …

SAKIB SULEMAN SAUDAGAR AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, comprising the husband, his parents‑in‑law and brothers‑in‑law, sought to quash FIR No. 0643 of 2025 alleging that the complainant (the husband’s wife) had made false and vague accusations of demanding money and subjecting her to cruelty. The FIR, lodged on 4‑Nov‑2025, detailed …

SHIVAPRAKASH NAIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Shivaprakash Nair and Somnath Biswas in connection with FIR No. 0436/2025 alleging offences under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, fraud and misappropriation in a …

JAMILABAI NASARU PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Court considered bail applications filed by Jamilabai Pathan, Amol Sonawane, Roshan Dhangar Bhil and Ajay Devde in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act arising from alleged kidnapping by enticement and sexual relations with minor girls aged 16 and above. …

SOMNATH BISWASversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Shivaprakash Nair and Somnath Biswas in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from a complex real‑estate partnership and alleged fraudulent share transfers. The informant alleged that co‑accused …

SONALI ARUN GAWANDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Ashwini Bharat Pund, Vice‑Chairman of M/s Bhagyalaxmi Multistate Co‑operative Credit Society, applied for regular bail in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs 54.77 crore from depositors. The prosecution alleged that she, along with other officers, induced investors with promises of high …

GOUS ALIAS TAGO RAFIK SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Gous alias Tago Rafik Shaikh applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 118(2), 118(1), 324(4), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging he assaulted an informant with a wooden stick, stole his phone and threatened him during a mayoral election. The FIR was …

ALIM RAHIM SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Alim Rahim Shah applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Crime No.0059/2025 concerning a large seizure of contraband gutkha. The prosecution’s case rests solely on the statement of a co‑accused, alleging Shah to be a supplier, with no other material linking him to the offence. Shah contended …

ALIM RAHIM SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Alim Rahim Shah applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of large quantities of contraband gutkha. The FIR alleged his involvement based solely on a co-accused's statement, with no other evidence linking him to the offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and …

PRIYANKA ALIAS RANI GOLDENSING JADHAVversusGOLDENSING GOKULDAS JADHAV

DISPOSED OFF

The wife, Priyanka Jadhav, filed an application to transfer her pending marriage petition (No. A73/2025) from the Family Court in Jalna to the Family Court in Parbhani, about 140 km away. The husband was duly served but did not appear to oppose the transfer. The wife has also lodged an FIR under …

DIGAMBAR KASHINATH PUTHEWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Digambar Kashinath Puthewad, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a fraud case (Crime No. 148/2025) alleging misappropriation of Rs.2,87,165 collected from bank customers. The FIR alleged he failed to deposit the collected sums, while the applicant contended that he had …

SHUBHAM SAMBHAJI SAWATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant Shubham Sambhaji Sawat was charged with murder and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Atrocities Act, the Arms Act and the Maharashtra Police Act following the disappearance and killing of a villager during a dispute over a promised statue. The appellant sought regular …

HANUMANT RAM BHALERAO AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Hanumant Ram Bhalerao and Jayashri Hanumant Bhalerao, were arrested in March 2026 for alleged involvement in the suicide of Muskan, who was said to have been harassed and physically assaulted by them and co‑accused, with a demand of Rs.25,00,000 for a house and vehicle. The …

PRIYANKA VINOD BHAGATversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Priyanka Vinod Bhagat, was arrested for the alleged murder of her husband, accused of colluding with a co-accused due to an alleged illicit relationship and a property dispute. The prosecution relied on statements of the deceased's sister, delayed recordings, and the fact that 28 …

AYAJ AJIM PATHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Ayaj Ajim Pathan and Shadab Rasid Tamboli in connection with Crime No. 283/2024, which alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act. The complainant, a 19‑year‑old girl, …

DNYANESHWAR DADASAHEB PAGARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The petitioners, eight members of the Kolpe family, were implicated in FIR No. 61/2026 for assaulting the informant and six others with iron rods and sticks on 18 February 2026. Applicants 2, 5, 6 and 8 sought pre‑arrest bail, alleging false implication, particularly that Applicant 8, Sanjay, was at …

NAGESH VIKRAM BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Shrihari Hardas Chavan, Nagesh Vikram Bhosale and Siddesh Sadish Kale in connection with a robbery on 24‑25 January 2025 and subsequent addition of offences under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOC Act). The applicants had …

AVINASH VISHNU JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Avinash V. Jadhav applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a robbery case (Crime No. 0581/2025) involving alleged theft of silver, gold ornaments and cash. The FIR initially claimed 30 kg of silver was stolen, later amended to 76 kg after recovery of more than 54 kg, raising doubts about the …

PRAMOD SUDAM GHOLAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Pramod Sudam Gholap, was arrested in connection with a case of alleged harassment, dowry demand and the suicide of his wife, registered as Crime No.426 of 2025 under Sections 80, 108 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The petitioner argued that there was no direct or indirect …

AJAY AVDHUT GIRI AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The nine applicants sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that they threatened a complainant and aided the main accused, Sant Harigir Dattagir Giri, in sexual relations under false pretences of marriage. The FIR charged offences under Sections 69 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

BALAJI MARUTI PAVIKAR ALIAS TENGETOL AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The appellants, Balaji and Dnyaneshwar Ravikar, were arrested in December 2025 for assaulting the informant's father with a deadly weapon, causing grievous injuries. They filed a bail application after the investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the …

ASHOK MAGAN MARATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Ashok Magan Marathe appealed against the denial of regular bail in a murder case linked to a dispute over election promises and alleged caste-based atrocities. The deceased was found dead on 1 July 2025, and the FIR was lodged on 3 July 2025 after a delay. The prosecution relied on CCTV footage, …

GOPAL TRILOKCHAND AGRAWALversusSHIVAPRAKASH NAIR AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Shivaprakash Nair and Somnath Biswas in connection with FIR No. 0436/2025 alleging offences under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, fraud and misappropriation in a …

GOPAL TRILOKCHAND AGRAWALversusSOMNATH BISWAS AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Shivaprakash Nair and Somnath Biswas in connection with FIR No. 0436/2025 alleging offences under various sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, fraud and misappropriation in a …

DIPAK JANKIRAM ADANE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

In Criminal Appeal No. 298 of 2026, the appellants sought relief against the State of Maharashtra. Appellants 2 and 3 withdrew their appeal and the court dismissed their proceedings. Appellant 1, Dipak Jankiram Adane, applied for pre‑arrest bail for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the …

YUVRAJ DATTU ALIAS DATTATRAY BHOLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Yuvraj Dattu applied for anticipatory bail in a case where the deceased allegedly committed suicide after being threatened by the applicant, who was also accused of having an extra‑marital relationship with the deceased’s wife. The FIR alleged offences under Sections 108, 352, 351(2), 351(3) r/w …

RAJU KERUBA SHINDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, six members of the Shinde family, were implicated in an assault case (Crime No. 220/2026) alleging grievous injuries to a victim, with charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR and investigation records contain counter‑reports, and no specific overt act …

LAXMAN SOMNATH HINGMIREversusBALAJI MARUTI RAVIKAR ALIAS TENGETOL

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Balaji Maruti Ravikar and Dnyaneshwar Maruti Ravikar were arrested in December 2025 for assaulting the informant's father with a deadly weapon, causing grievous injuries. The FIR (Crime No. 737 of 2025) led to charges under Sections 109, 308(4), 308(5), 190 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. …

SUSHANT SUKHDEV VIDHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Prashant Sukhdev Vidhate and Sushant Sukhdev Vidhate against the State of Maharashtra. A charge‑sheet had been filed for offences under Sections 74, 118(1), 115(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and …

SHILADEVI SUDHIR TIWARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Mrs. Shiladevi Sudhir Tiwari applied for anticipatory bail before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief for offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(2), 318(4) r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 3 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial …

SHUBHAM ASHOK SADEWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Shubham Ashok Sadewar, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with Crime No. 597/2024 involving alleged abduction, extortion and possession of arms. The FIR described the kidnapping of an informant’s father and a demand for Rs. 1 crore, leading to charges under multiple …

BABASAHEB CHAGAN RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Babasaheb Chagan Rathod, was arrested in April 2026 in connection with Crime No. 102 of 2026 for an alleged offence punishable under Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleged to have pushed the deceased into a dam resulting in drowning. He contended that the prosecution’s …

ANIL AMBADAS MALVEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Anil applied for regular bail in a robbery case (crime no. 029 of 2026) registered at Pachod Police Station under Sections 309(4), 311 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He contended that the FIR was lodged two days after the alleged incident, that the FIR named unknown persons, no test …

SANTOSH @ BANDU PANDHARINATH NAWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Santosh @ Bandu Pandharinath Nawalé and Amol Ambadas Bhosale, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in connection with Crime No.130/2025 involving alleged supply of contraband gutkha. The FIR records a raid that seized a large quantity of gutkha from a co‑accused, whose …

AMOL AMBADAS BHOSALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Santosh @ Bandu Pandharinath Nawalé and Amol Ambadas Bhosale, filed anticipatory bail applications fearing arrest in connection with Crime No.130/2025 involving alleged supply of contraband gutkha. The FIR records a raid that seized a large quantity of gutkha from a co‑accused, whose …

ANAND VIJAYKUMAR KUKDEJAversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Anand Vijaykumar Kukdeja applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case alleging that gold pledged for a loan was spurious, violating Sections 318(4), 316(2) r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR states he obtained a loan of Rs.8.65 lakh, but the gold verification was conducted …

MARUTI BABASAHEB WAGHMODEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Maruti Babasaheb Waghmode was arrested in Crime No.217 of 2026 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act, including assault, threats, and alleged outraging of modesty. The applicant sought regular bail, arguing that the allegations against him were limited to abusive language, …

GANGAPRASAD SITARAM PANDVIRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Gangaprasan, aged 64, was arrested in connection with a murder case (Crime No.29 of 2026) for alleged instigation of his son Manohar, who allegedly assaulted and caused the death of Shaikh Faruq. The FIR alleged that after the assault, the applicant encouraged his son to continue the …

BHIMRAO MADHAVRAO KUTE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

Withdrawn

The appellants Bhimrao Madhavrao Kute and others filed a criminal appeal challenging the trial court's judgment in Crime No. 119/2026, which involved offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. During the hearing, counsel …

JALAMSING SOMA PADVIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered the bail application of Jalamsing Soma Padvi, accused of murdering Laxmi Vasave under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution’s case is largely circumstantial but includes frequent telephonic contact between the …

SHUBHAM SANTOSH JAWANEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

Shubham Santosh Jawane appealed for bail in a criminal case (C.R. No. 212/2026) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, including false promise of marriage and forcible sexual relations. The FIR alleged that the appellant had …

BHANUDAS KASHINATH SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The six applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 220/2026) under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, alleging that they were implicated in an incident that resulted in grievous injuries to a victim. The FIR described a violent assault, but the …

PRIYANKA SANDEEP RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Priyanka Sandeep Rathod applied for anticipatory bail after being charged under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly pushing her husband from a balcony. The husband alleged she attempted to kill him, while the applicant claimed he was drunk, jumped on his own, and that she had …

SHUBHAM DATTATRAY HAJAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Shubham Dattatray Hajare applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 344/2026, alleged to involve offences under Sections 123, 223, 274 and 275 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State sought additional time to produce investigation papers, marking the fourth such request, and the …

SUNIL BHAUSING RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for alleged assault on an informant and his father over a land dispute. The FIR alleged that Sunil Bhausing Rathod assaulted the informant with an axe, causing a grievous head injury, while …

VITTHAL BHAUSAHEB DIWTE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, four members of the Diwte family, were arrested on 2 June 2026 in connection with Crime No. 195 of 2026 for alleged assault on the father of the informant, Tukaram, during a land‑related dispute. The FIR alleges that the accused kicked and struck Tukaram, who had a prior brain …

SANJAY RATANSING PATALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Sanjay Patale, was arrested on 3 January 2026 in connection with a murder alleged to have occurred on 30 December 2025, for which he was named as accused No.3 in Crime No. 001 of 2026. The prosecution alleged that the victim died from throttling and that the accused was present at the …

VIJAY ASARAM GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Narayan Kardile was arrested on 23 April 2026 for alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including hurling a stone at a vehicle and assault with a stick causing simple injuries. The informant, who was the driver of the truck, filed the FIR and later expressed no …

SHAKYA PRESH SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants were arrested in connection with Crime No. 303 of 2026, arising from a dispute over hoisting a blue flag on a pole already bearing a saffron flag, which led to stone‑pelting by a mob of over 200 persons and injuries to an informant and police officers. The applicants contended that no …

RITESH JEJERATH GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court heard a batch of anticipatory bail applications arising from Crime No. 303 of 2026, involving a dispute over hoisting a blue flag over a saffron flag on an electric pole, which led to stone‑pelting and injuries to an informant and police personnel. The applicants, named in the FIR, …

GANESH VAIJNATH RUKKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …

ARVIND PANDURANG BAWAKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Arvind Pandurang Bawake was arrested in Crime No.213 of 2026 for alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, stemming from his role as a special power of attorney in a land sale transaction. The prosecution alleged cheating and criminal …

DEVIDAS LAXMAN PRADHAN AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Devidas Laxman Pradhan and others, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 197/2026, alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR was lodged on 29 March 2026 for an incident that occurred on 24 March 2026, alleging that …

MANINDARSINGH DHARAMSINGH JAHAGIRDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …

NILU SOPANRAO GHULE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Nilu Sopanrao Ghule and Asha Sopan Ghule, sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0067/2026, alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR, lodged five days after the alleged incident, disclosed a dispute between the parties and was …

ATUL MOHANRAO PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …

RITESH RADHAKRISHNA GAIKWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ritesh RadhaKrishna Gaikwad applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 345 of 2026) under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged he assaulted the informant with an iron rod, causing a fracture, while a co‑accused used a brick. The applicant …

ANIL BHAUSING RATHODversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, four members of the Rathod family, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a land dispute that led to an alleged assault on the informant and his father on 1 May 2026. The FIR alleged that Sunil Bhausing Rathod assaulted the informant with an axe, causing a bleeding injury, while …

VITTHAL KISHAN RAO GHODKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …

ATUL MOHANRAO PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …

ANIKET POPAT TIPE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of anticipatory bail applications arising from Crime No. 303 of 2026, registered at Bhoom Police Station, involving a dispute over hoisting a blue flag over a saffron flag which led to stone‑pelting by a mob of over 200 persons and injuries …

PRASHANT SUKHDEV VIDHATEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Prashant Sukhdev Vidhate and Sushant Sukhdev Vidhate in a case where a charge‑sheet had been filed for offences under Sections 74, 118(1), 115(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 12 of the …

ATUL MOHANRAO PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered three anticipatory bail applications filed by Manindarsingh Dharamsingh Jahagirdar, Vitthal Kishan Rao Ghodke and Ganesh Vaijnath Rukke in connection with offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to forged power of …

BHARAT BHIKAN BIRHADE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, considered an anticipatory bail application filed by two brothers, Bharat Bhikan Birhade and Dipak Ramesh Birhade (Koli), against charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court noted that the FIR alleged a stabbing by Dipak but …

ABHIJIT SURESH BANSODE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0129/2026, alleging assault on an informant with grievous and simple injuries. The FIR alleged that Abhijeet used a sickle, Rohit used an iron rod, while Akash was accused of assault without any weapon. The applicants argued that …

JANARDHAN GOVERDHAN JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Janardan Gov... Jadav, sought regular bail for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, arising from an FIR alleging forcible sexual assault with the assistance of his employee. The appellant's counsel …

MAYUR KAILAS NIKALJEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Mayur, an armed forces personnel, was arrested on 24-06-2026 for an alleged offence under Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, involving a false promise of marriage and alleged sexual exploitation of a 23‑year‑old woman. The complainant claimed that the relationship was consensual, that she …

NITIN VIJAY LODWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Nitin Vijay Lodwal, aged about 20, was accused of throwing a stone at a lady’s house and then pulling her and outraging her modesty, offences punishable under Section 74 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He filed an anticipatory bail application, claiming a tenancy and loan dispute with …

VISHAL BABASAHEB KOLPE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) considered bail applications of four accused in a case of assault with iron rods, wooden sticks and other weapons under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged a coordinated attack on the informant’s family causing both simple and grievous …

SAMADHAN ABHIMAN KADAMversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of anticipatory bail applications arising from the same incident (Crime No. 303 of 2026) involving a dispute over flag hoisting that led to stone‑pelting and injuries to police personnel. The applicants argued that there were no specific …

AMIT ARUN MASKAR AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of anticipatory bail applications arising from the same incident (Crime No. 303 of 2026) involving a dispute over flag hoisting that led to stone‑pelting and injuries to police personnel. The applicants argued that there were no specific …

SHANKAR MADHUKAR GUNJALversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant Shankar Madhukar Gunjal appealed under Section 14‑A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against a Special Judge’s order denying pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged caste‑based verbal abuse and assault. The FIR alleged that the appellant …

SUSHANT SHARADCHANDRA PHADNISversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Sushant Sharadchandra Phadnis and Shilpa Sushant Phadnis, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a fraud case (Crime No. 0329/2026) alleging investment scams involving K to Z Company and Nextech Vision Pvt. Ltd. The informant claimed the applicants induced him to invest Rs.1.24 …

VAIBHAV BALASAHEB SATHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Vaibhav Balasaheb Sathe, filed an anticipatory bail application in connection with a crime registered under Sections 3, 4, 5, 7, 8 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act and Section 99 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution’s case relied mainly on statements of a co‑accused …

SHILPA SUSHANT PHADNISversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, Sushant Sharadchandra Phadnis and Shilpa Phadnis, feared arrest in connection with a fraud case (Crime No. 0329/2026) involving alleged investment scams through K to Z Company and Nextech Vision Pvt. Ltd. The informant claimed the applicants induced him to invest Rs.1.24 crore and …

SHAIKH AYANUDDIN AZIMUDDINversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS by Shaikh Ayanuddin Azimuddin, who was arrested in connection with a narcotics case involving the illegal sale of codeine‑containing cough syrup. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had regular telephone contact …

KALIM RAHIM SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Crime No.0059/2025 involving alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Food Safety and Standards Act. The FIR recorded a raid that seized a large quantity of contraband gutkha from a co-accused, whose statement …

KALIM RAHIM SHAHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Kalim Rahim Shah applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving alleged supply of contraband gutkha, charged under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Food Safety and Standards Act. The FIR is based on a raid that seized a large quantity of gutkha from a co-accused, …

AKSHAY BALKRUSHNA SHETEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Akshay Balkrushna Shete, was charged with several offences including abduction, murder and destruction of evidence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Maharashtra Police Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged that …

SHRIDHAR BHAGWAT DHAWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Shridhar Bhagwat Dhawale appealed for pre‑arrest bail in a case involving alleged caste‑based abuse and assault, charged under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR, lodged seven days after the alleged …

PAWAN SITARAM PARDHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Pawan Sitaram Pardhi applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered for alleged attempts to kill an informant with a wooden log, invoking sections 109, 296, 115(2), 351(3) and 352 r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant claimed the applicant threatened him, but the …

ASHOK SAHEBRAO JADHAV AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case registered for theft, extortion and related offences under Sections 119(1), 308(2), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the applicants had taken away two motorcycles belonging to the informant and …

NITIN SUNIL SHELKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered the bail application of Nitin Sunil Shelke, arrested for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The victim was 17 years, 10 months old at …

LATIFUDDIN ISMAIL UDDIN SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in connection with alleged forgery of a power of attorney and a subsequent sale deed, invoking sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Indian Registration Act. He claimed to have acted in good faith, having published a notice and paid consideration in …

SHIRISH MANGALNATH JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, Shirish Mangalnath Joshi, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered as Crime No. 237 of 2026 under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He was alleged to have obtained Rs.10 lakh from the informant by promising a government job, issued a cheque for the same amount …

NARAYAN SANJAY BORUDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Narayan Sanjay Borude, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging that he assaulted an informant with an iron rod, causing injuries to the neck and knees. The applicant argued that there were disputes between the parties, the FIR was lodged after a delay, and the …

ASHIK LIYAKAT SARDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ashik Liyakat Sardar was arrested in January 2026 for allegedly injecting chemicals into cattle to increase milk yield, facing charges under Sections 123, 210, 274, 276 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 11(1)(g) and 12 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960. The prosecution …

AJITSINGH DAULATSINGH SHILEDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Ajitsingh Daulatsingh Shiledar, was charged under Sections 132, 79, 351(1) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly abusing officers in a Tahsil office in the presence of female staff. He filed an anticipatory bail application, submitting an affidavit stating that he had …

SANTOSH HANUMANT DHAGEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

Santosh Hanumant Dhage appealed for regular bail in a case alleging forced sexual intercourse and threats, charged under sections 64, 115(2), 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and several provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The victim, a member …

SHAYAD SHAIKH ABDUL SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant challenged a Special Court order that denied him regular bail in a case involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The FIR related to an assault on the informant's husband, but the …

NARESH KHEMRAJ JOSHIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Naresh Khemraj Joshi, the lessee of a lodge where illegal prostitution was discovered during a police raid, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 143(3) and 144(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 3 to 6 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act. The State argued that the lease …

GULCHAND SUKHDEV KOLHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, Gulchand Sukhdev Kolhe, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a suicide case (Crime No. 293/2026) alleging offences under Sections 108, 115(2), 352 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that after the deceased repaid a loan, the applicant abused …

AKHATAR KARIM SHAIKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of a large quantity of contraband gutkha, alleged under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Food Safety and Standards Act. The FIR links the applicant to the crime solely through the statement of a …

VISHNU SARJERAO DABHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Vishnu Sarjerao Dabhade, a fertilizer retailer, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a raid revealed alleged non‑maintenance of records and an expired licence. The prosecution alleged offences under Section 318(4) r/w Sec. 3(5) of the …

MANGAL GIRDHAR GUJARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Mangal Girdhara Gujar applied for anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 0097/2026, alleging assault on an informant. The FIR charges him under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Maharashtra Police Act. The applicant contended that a prior counter‑report and CCTV …

RAHUL BHIKAJI THOKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Rahul Bhikaji Thoke, was alleged to have forcibly taken beer bottles from a wine shop and the informant filed a FIR under Sections 308(2), 308(5), 351(3) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant contended that he had paid the full amount for the bottles via UPI before the …

DNYANESHWAR BHUJANG AVHADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Dnyaneshwar Bhujang Avhad, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a police case alleging assault with an iron rod and several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR described an incident on 25 June 2026 where the applicant and co‑accused allegedly assaulted the …

SAYED MUJAHID SAYED FAROOQUEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISMISSED

The applicant, Sayed Mujahid Sayed Farooque, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Food Safety and Standards Act after a police raid seized contraband gutka worth Rs. 14,02,405 from his premises. He argued that he had already been granted …

GAURAV VIJAY DESHMUKHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered three anticipatory bail applications arising from an assault case registered as Crime No. 179/2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The first applicant, Gaurav Deshmukh, withdrew his application, which was dismissed as withdrawn. The remaining applicants, Bhavesh Sunil …

BHAVESH SUNIL MAHAJANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered three anticipatory bail applications arising from an assault case registered as Crime No. 179/2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The first applicant, Gaurav Deshmukh, withdrew his application, which was dismissed as withdrawn. The remaining applicants, Bhavesh Sunil …

SAMADHAN DINKAR KOLI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, Samadhan Dinkar Koli and Laxman Ishwar Koli, were implicated in an assault case (Crime No. 0384/2026) where the witness Kalpesh suffered a simple head injury allegedly caused by a stick. Applicant No. 1 withdrew his anticipatory bail application, leading to its dismissal. Applicant …

RAJU MANSINGH RATHOD AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, considered anticipatory bail applications filed by Raju Mansingh Rathod, Sanjay Harishchandra Phoke and Sachin Gabru Rathod in connection with two FIRs alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, including forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust …

TUKARAM DNYANOBA KACHGUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Tukaram Dnyanoba Kachgunde applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged assault on informant Ashok on 28 June 2026, for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant claimed the applicant sat on his chest and throttled him, while co‑accused used iron …

GIMLIBAI BAMNYA RAUTversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Gimlibai Bamnya Raut applied for anticipatory bail in a murder case (Crime No. 65 of 2026) under Sections 103(1) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleges that Mahendra, a mentally ill man, entered her house, assaulted her with a stick, and that she and family members later tied …

PRITEE FULJEE KOKANIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay heard three anticipatory bail applications filed by police personnel accused of misappropriating Rs. 47.6 lakh of government funds transferred to their accounts through a digital salary processing system. The applicants claimed they were unaware of the illegality, …

KAILAS JANARDHAN WAGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered three anticipatory bail applications arising from an assault case registered as Crime No. 179/2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The first applicant, Gaurav Deshmukh, withdrew his application, which was dismissed as withdrawn. The remaining applicants, Bhavesh Sunil …

DEEPAK BALASAHEB TUPEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Deepak Balasaheb Tupe, convicted under Section 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for assault with a sword, applied for suspension of his five‑year sentence and bail pending an appeal. He argued that he was only a secondary accused, that the sword was not recovered, and that the FIR was lodged three …

ABHISHEK VISHNU SURWASE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench, heard a batch of anticipatory bail applications arising from Crime No. 303 of 2026, registered at Bhoom Police Station, involving a dispute over hoisting a blue flag over a saffron flag which led to stone‑pelting by a mob of over 200 persons and injuries …

MAYUR BALU GAVALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay heard three anticipatory bail applications filed by police personnel accused of misappropriating Rs. 47.6 lakh of government funds transferred to their accounts through a digital salary processing system. The applicants claimed they were unaware of the illegality, …

DAYANAND NAMDEO KAMBLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicant, Dayanand Namdeo Kamble, a supervisor for the erection of a distribution pole, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a death of a laborer who came into contact with a live electric wire. The FIR alleged that the death occurred despite a permit being obtained for the work, and the …

ROHIT SUDHAKAR ADHAVversusGAURAV VIJAY DESHMUKH AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court considered three anticipatory bail applications arising from an assault case registered as Crime No. 179/2026 under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The first applicant, Gaurav Deshmukh, withdrew his application, which was dismissed as withdrawn. The remaining applicants, Bhavesh Sunil …

SHARAD PITER JADHAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The applicant, a 68‑year‑old man, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a property‑sale fraud alleged under Sections 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleges that he impersonated the owner of Gut No. 453 and executed a fraudulent sale deed. The …

VENKAT MAROTI AMRUTWADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Venkat applied to quash FIR No. 198 of 2025 alleging that he was falsely implicated for abetment of his alleged fiancée Sunita's suicide under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR, lodged by Sunita's brother Balaji a month after her death, claimed that Venkat had promised marriage, …

MAHENDRA BHAGWAN SHINDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

The High Court of Bombay heard three anticipatory bail applications filed by police personnel accused of misappropriating Rs. 47.6 lakh of government funds transferred to their accounts through a digital salary processing system. The applicants claimed they were unaware of the illegality, …

ASHOK APPASAHEB MATKARversusTUKARAM DNYANOBA KACHGUNDE AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Tukaram Dnyanoba Kachgunde applied for anticipatory bail in connection with an alleged assault on informant Ashok on 28 June 2026, for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The informant claimed the applicant sat on his chest and throttled him, while co‑accused used iron …

MANSUR HUSAIN DALALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISPOSED OFF

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mansur Husain Dalal, a broker who introduced the informant to co‑accused in a complex real‑estate fraud involving the takeover of two subsidiary companies. The informant alleged that the co‑accused forged documents, misappropriated …

FIROJ KHAN MAHEMUD KHANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

DISMISSED

Firoj Khan Mahemud Khan applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged receipt of contraband gutka and pan masala seized from co‑accused. The offences are punishable under Sections 123, 223, 274, 275 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 59 of the Food …

SHIVRAJ GOVIND RATHOD AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The accused Shivraj, Bhimrao and Sahebrao were charged with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for allegedly assaulting the informant's family with iron rods, wooden sticks and an axe, causing injuries. The prosecution’s charge‑sheet contained injury certificates only for two victims and …

GOPAL TRILOKCHAND AGRAWALversusMANSUR HUSAIN DALAL AND ANOHER

DISPOSED OFF

Mansur Husain Dalal applied for anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging fraud, forgery and cheating in a real‑estate partnership involving the informant Gopal Agrawal and co‑accused. The applicant contended that he was merely a broker who introduced the informant to the co‑accused and …

AKASH NANASAHEB PANGAVHANE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita arising from an alleged assault on 29‑07‑2025. The prosecution alleged that the applicants, using an iron rod and axe, inflicted multiple injuries on the victim, and presented an injury certificate …

NARSIMHA VITTHALRAO DESHPANDE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, who are bank employees, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 436/2025 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, fraud and misappropriation of funds in a real‑estate partnership dispute. The informant, a partner in the disputed …

GOPAL TRILOKCHAND AGRAWALversusNARSIMHA VITTHALRAO DESHPANDE AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The applicants, who are bank employees, sought anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 436/2025 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita relating to alleged forgery, fraud and misappropriation of funds in a real‑estate partnership dispute. The informant, a partner in the disputed …

PRAVIN PRAKASHRAO JAGTAP AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants sought anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 332/2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR indicated that the informant was initially assaulted by a single person and later by a group, without naming the applicants, and the …

SHAIKH RAMZAN SHAIKH MADARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

DISPOSED OFF

The appellant, Shaikh Ramzan, was arrested for the murder of the deceased under Section 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The prosecution relied solely on circumstantial evidence – the accused being last seen with the …

NAVNATH GOARKSHNATH BHAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicant, Navnath Goarkshnath Bhawar, was charged under Section 64 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged sexual assault on 08‑08‑2025. The prosecution alleged that the applicant forcibly assaulted the complainant, while the applicant claimed the incident was a false implication …

KISHOR VINAYKRAO BHARDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

DISPOSED OFF

Kishor Vinaykrao Bharde, a re‑valuer of gold pledged with a bank, was implicated in a case of alleged misappropriation of Rs 1.36 crore involving fake gold ornaments. The FIR charged him under Sections 318(4), 316(2) read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant argued that …

RAM KUSHABA MOKASHEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

Ram Kushaba Mokashe applied for anticipatory bail in connection with offences under Sections 109 and 49 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, arising from an alleged attempt to kill a person by driving a tractor. The FIR dated 17‑10‑2025 records serious injuries to the informant, who claims …

LATABAI DIGAMBARRAO JADHAV AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The applicants, who are the in‑laws of a woman who committed suicide, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 108, 115(2) and 352 read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR alleged that the applicants demanded Rs 10 lakhs for construction of an upper floor, which the …

SHADAB RASID TAMBOLIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLICATION ALLOWED

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad bench considered two anticipatory bail applications filed by Ayaj Ajim Pathan and Shadab Rasid Tamboli in connection with Crime No. 283/2024, which involved offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. …

FIROJ NURUDDIN SANADI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The wife (Respondent No.2) lodged an FIR alleging dowry‑related cruelty and physical assault by her husband and claimed that his parents (the petitioners) were also involved. The petitioners, who are the in‑laws, filed writ petitions seeking to quash the FIR and the charge‑sheet on the ground that …

SUREKHA PRAKASH WAGHMARE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Rejected

The Applicants sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a murder case (Crime No. 0319 of 2026) involving multiple offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleged that the deceased Mukund was first run over by a …

PRATIK DILIP KALE AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicants, Pratik Kale and his father Dilip Sitaram Kale, filed an anticipatory bail application in Crime No. 153 of 2026 for alleged violations of the Essential Commodities Act, Insecticides Act, Fertilizer Control Order, Insecticides Rules and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. Pratik Kale withdrew …

IRANNA CHANBASAPPA BIRAJDARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed off as Withdrawn

Iranna Chanbasappa Birajdar, a 25‑year‑old, was charged under sections 64, 65(1), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and sections 4, 8, 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. He filed a bail application (Criminal Bail Application No. 825 of 2026) seeking release. His …

SIDDHIVINAYAK VISHNU KUDALKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed as Withdrawn

The applicant, Siddhivinayak Vishnu Kudalkar, filed a bail application (Criminal Bail Application No. 834 of 2026) seeking release on bail for an FIR (No. 257 of 2026) registered under Section 108 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The investigating officer informed the court that the investigation was …

GAUTAM NILAKA @ NELKYA KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND NAR

Dismissed

The applicant, Gautam Nilaka, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita for offences of robbery and related crimes under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He is accused No.2 in a case where senior citizens were robbed of gold ornaments, and the trial court had …

RAHUL DATTATRAY CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Allowed

The applicant, Rahul Dattatray Chavan, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for alleged offences under Sections 108, 80, 85 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from the suicide of his sister‑in‑law. The …

ABHIMAN TULSHIRAM GAT AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Allowed

The applicant, Abhiman Tulshiram Gat, aged 78, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in Crime No.160 of 2026 for alleged assault under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged …

UPESH RANJIT PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Upesh Ranjit Patil, founder of Flynaut OPC and Flynaut Saas Pvt. Ltd., was arrested in connection with a complaint alleging that he duped training candidates by failing to place them despite promises, invoking charges under Sections 316(2), 316(5), 318(4), 112(2) read with Section …

SHAUKATALI KHUSHIYAL PATHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The petitioner, Shaukatali Khushiyal Pathan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking to quash FIR No. 237 of 2026 alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. The petitioner argued that the same issues were pending before the Supreme Court and …

SUJIT BHANUDAS GHODKE AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicants, contractors of the complainant, were accused of cheating and breach of trust, leading to an FIR for several offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The parties later entered into a Deed of Compromise, with the complainant affirming receipt of the agreed amounts. The court …

VICKY MANOHAR LADGEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The applicant, Vicky Manohar Ladge, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he merely purchased a plot of land and was not involved in the alleged forgery and fraud. The prosecution alleged that the sale deed was …

GANESH DATTATRAY PINGALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by Ganesh Dattatray Pingale, who is accused of causing grievous hurt to a relative during a land dispute. The FIR alleges that the applicant entered the victim’s agricultural field, a …

MOHAMED NADEEM HIDAYATULLAH KHANversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Vicky Manohar Ladge, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he merely purchased a plot of land and was not involved in the alleged forgery and fraud. The prosecution alleged that the sale deed was …

BANDILAL DEVILAL YADAVversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The High Court considered bail application No. 3423 of 2026 filed by Bansilal Devilal Yadav, accused in a case involving alleged fake currency under sections 178, 179, 180 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution relied on two witness statements: one from Accused No.2 alleging …

ROVINA SHELDON REMEDIUS AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The appellants, Rovina Sheldon Remedius and Sheldon Desmond Remedius, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 14A of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act after being implicated in a murder case (Crime No. 153 of 2025) arising from a property dispute. The FIR lodged by the deceased's …

TUSHAR SHIVAJI UGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a police constable, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashal of FIR No. 333/2025 registered for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR arose from a family land‑sale dispute in which …

TUSHAR SHIVAJI UGALEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a police constable, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashal of FIR No. 333/2025 registered for alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The FIR arose from a family land‑sale dispute in which …

AKSHAY KISHAN SONAWANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Akshay Kishan Sonawane applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR (C.R. No.199 of 2026) alleging offences under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant claimed he was not involved in the …

NASIR HUSAIN MOHAMMAD ALI ANSARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

ABU HORAIRA MOHAMMAD IBRAHIMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

ZAINAB MOHAMMEDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed on back‑dated dates. The prosecution alleged that thirteen …

ZAHID HUSAIN MOHAMMAD ALIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

AALIA MOHAMMED MUSTAFA AND ANRversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

SHAIKH SARIYA ATHAR HUSAIN AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

AFEEFA AAFREEN MOHAMMAD AMEENversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by teachers and staff of Malegaon High School and Junior College who were alleged to have been fraudulently appointed between 2012 and 2024. The …

DEEPAK BHEEMRAO KATARKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed

The applicant, Deepak Bheemrao Katarkar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a sexual assault case (CR No.37 of 2026) alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that the applicant …

AMOL PANDURANG SAWANTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

Amol Pandurang Sawant challenged a detention order issued by the Thane Commissioner of Police under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981. The order relied on a preamble describing his past criminal conduct and on specific recent offences and in‑camera statements. The …

SANDEEP SITARAM AMBREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ANTICIPATORY BAIL REJECTED

The applicant, Sandeep Sitaram Ambre, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a cheating case (Crime No. 217 of 2026) registered under Sections 316(4), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3) and 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya …

ALPESH HARSHADBHAI CHOKSIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Alpesh Harshadbhaai Choksi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11210068260293 filed at Vesu Police Station, Surat, alleging offences under Section 318(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The allegation stems …

BALKRISHNA DNYANOBA KHANDVE AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Dismissed

Balkrishna Dnyanoba Khandve and another applied for anticipatory bail, but neither appeared in court. The State of Maharashtra, through its counsel, pointed out that the applicants had undisclosed criminal antecedents. The intervenor highlighted several FIRs/CRs against the applicants under sections …

VIVEK PRAFULBHAI NARANBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita including forgery and assault. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant played an active role and might tamper with …

SAHILSHA @IRFANSHA CHINGISHA @AMINSHA BANWAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

39-RULE DISCHARGED/DISMISSED @ FH

The Gujarat High Court examined a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by the accused, who faced charges of murder under Sections 103(1), 115(2), 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. The prosecution alleged …

HIRABHAI RAHABHAI BORICHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Gujarat Police Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the gravity of the alleged crimes. The Court examined the …

JITENDRASINH LALITSINH RANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

42-RULE DISCHARGED @ FH

The applicant, a practising doctor, was charged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the POCSO Act for allegedly performing an illegal abortion on a minor victim and destroying related evidence. The victim, a girl aged between 16 and 18, had been sexually exploited by her landlord, became pregnant, …

RUPESH RAMSAJIVANLAL SONIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Allowed To be withdrawn

Rupesh Ramsajivanlal Soni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a criminal case (Crime No. 639 of 2026) registered under Section 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The applicant argued that the dispute was …

SACHIN NANDUPRASAD KUMARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Allowed

The applicant, Sachin Nanduprasad Kumar, was arrested in connection with a murder case (CR No. 407 of 2025) in which his co‑accused, Sameer Jadhav, allegedly killed his wife and burned the body. The prosecution’s case against the applicant rests mainly on a confession made by Jadhav while in police …

VALIKHAN BHIKHUBHAI PATHAN(AS PER ORDER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging impersonation of LCB officials, extortion and other offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant, Valikhan …

SAHID ABDUL RASID KURESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners, accused of possessing prohibited cow progeny meat under the Gujarat Animal Preservation Act and related statutes, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 after a charge‑sheet was filed. They had been in custody for about seven …

SURESHBHAI HIRABHAI KATARAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Sureshbhai Hirabhai Katara, applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging forgery of a death certificate and related offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State opposed bail, claiming the …

VIKRAM @ VIKO LALJIBHAI KOLIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vikram @ Viko Laljibhai Koli, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging theft of 36 mobile phones under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State opposed bail, …

VISHNU KHICHAD S/O RAMKENversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

Vishnu Khichad filed a special criminal application under Article 226, Article 227 of the Constitution and Section 497 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking release of his Maruti Suzuki Brezza (Reg. No. GJ-08-BS-5443) seized in connection with FIR No.11195050240930 for alleged possession …

ABHAY DHIRUBHAI PARSANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet had been filed in FIR C.R. No.11203024250934 (2025) alleging offences under Sections 317(2) and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and …

PRADIPKUMAR DINESHBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Prohibition Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The prosecution opposed bail, arguing the applicant's involvement and the gravity of the …

VIKRAMBHAI JESINGBHAI JOGRANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vikrambhai Jograna, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 351(3), 352 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The FIR initially did not name him, but he was later implicated for …

DARSHAN @ LALU GOKULBHAI CHAUDHARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioner, Darshan @ Lalu Gokulbhai Chaudhary, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a chargesheet was filed for offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State opposed bail, citing 13 eyewitnesses and …

LAKHAN MOHAN WASWANI @ PATILversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

Lakhan Mohan Waswani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged sword attacks causing grievous injuries. He claimed false implication and sought bail to appear for examinations, citing his student status. The State argued …

RAVINDRABHAI PRABHUBHAI HALVADIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by Ravindrabhai Prabhubhai Halvadiya, who was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging extortion and related offences under several sections of the …

NARESHKUMAR DHANRAJBHAI KHARASANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) by Nareshkumar Dhanrajbhai Kharasan, who was arrested in connection with a cyber gaming fraud alleged under Sections 318(4), 61(2), 317(4) of the Bharatiya …

AAMIR ALAM AFTAB ALAM SAIYEDversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed by Aamir Alam Afatb Alam Saiyed, who was charged under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Gujarat Police Act. The applicant, in custody since …

SOLANKI VISHWAJITSINH PRAFULBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Solanki Vishwajitsinh Prafulbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR CR No.11196002260296 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …

HARSH SHAILESHBHAI PARMAR (NAME AS PER SESSION COURT ORDER)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet had been filed for offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 352, 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act. …

ANAS S/O. FARIDBHAI KADARBHAI DUDHWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Anas Dudhwala, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 305(a), 331(3) and 331(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The applicant claimed innocence, no prior record, and …

JAHID @BHURIYA S/O MOHOMMAD FARID MIRversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jahid Bhuriya applied for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging robbery, assault and offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Gujarat Police Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicant played an active role …

ROHITBHAI @KALI RAMESHBHAI SARVAIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Rohitbhai Sarvaiya, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 305(a), 331(3), 331(4), 317(4), 317(5) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The State opposed bail, …

DINESHKUMAR MUKNARAM RAKISHAN GODARA (VISHNOI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Dinesh Kumar Muknaram Rakishan Godara, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR under the Gujarat Prohibition Act and the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. He claimed innocence, stating that the investigation …

RAVI @MORARI KESABHAI MATANGversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The accused, Ravi @Morari Keshabhai Matang and others, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Gujarat Police Act. Their earlier anticipatory bail …