Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The applicant, Annasaheb Ganpat Gaikwak, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in connection with Crime No. 868 of 2025, which involved multiple offences under the Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court noted that a co‑accused in the same case had already been granted …
Farman applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 232 of 2026) charged under Sections 137(2), 98, 75 of the B.N.S. and Sections 7/8 of the POCSO Act, registered at Police Station Tronica City, Ghaziabad. The State argued for continued custody, but the applicant’s counsel highlighted that no …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kush Patel, who was charged under several provisions of the B.N.S., the Uttar Pradesh Public Examination Act and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The applicant argued that the co‑accused's statement implicating him lacked …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ashish (Pinku) in a case registered under Sections 87, 142 and 64 of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR was lodged two months after the alleged incident and that the victim’s statements were inconsistent and indicated …
The appellants challenged a judgment that had set aside a trial court decree declaring a 1986 Will executed by their grandfather Reshiabhai void on grounds of lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence. The trial court had found the Will fraudulent but dismissed the suit for jurisdictional …
