Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita

44 judgments · newest first · showing 1–44

PANKAJ @ PRASHANTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Pankaj @ Prashant in a criminal case (Crime No. 135 of 2026) under Sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The FIR alleged that the applicant had enticed the daughter of the …

ARVIND YADAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita seeking to quash the complaint case No. 944 of 2025 (Sohan Yadav v. Arvind Yadav & Others) and the summons issued on 24 July 2026. They contended that the Judicial Magistrate had taken cognizance of an application …

MUNNARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Munnar, the father‑in‑law of a woman who died by suicide, under Sections 85 and 80(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that there was no material …

SHOLEversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, husband of a woman who allegedly committed suicide, sought bail in a dowry death case filed under sections 80(2) and 85 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He claimed false implication, lack of material linking him to cruelty, and a clean …

MOHAN SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and all proceedings arising from a case under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The parties had reached a full settlement, which …

PARMAR JAIMIN GAUTAMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide linked to a family property dispute. The trial court had earlier granted bail despite the prosecution's …

PARMAR JAIMIN GAUTAMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide linked to a family property dispute. The trial court had earlier granted bail despite the prosecution's …

PARMAR JAIMIN GAUTAMBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The complainant sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the accused in a case involving alleged abetment of suicide linked to a property dispute, invoking Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The trial court had earlier granted bail despite the prosecution's reliance …

RAJESHBHAI CAPTAIN KESHVANPILLAI JOHNversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

The original complainant filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking cancellation of regular bail granted to the accused in a case involving alleged preparation of false rent bills and misappropriation of Rs.3.60 crore. The trial …

VINODBHAI TULSIDAS DAWANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vinodbhai Tulsidas Dawani applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11196042260140) alleging offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant argued that the matter stemmed …

RAMARAM TULSARAM PRAJAPATIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Ramaram Tulsaram Prajapati, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11996006251093 alleging violations of the Prohibition Act (sections 65(a), 65(e), 116‑B, 98(2), 81) and the …

KOTADIYA DEVAJI MOHANJIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR C.R. No.11195061260467 alleging offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. They contended that they are merely brokers …

VIJAY BABULAL MEGHVALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Vijay Babulal Meghval applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11191002260193) alleging offences under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, …

MUKESH DILIPBHAI JOSHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mukesh Dilipbhai Joshi applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210003260707) alleging offences under Sections 74, 75 and 78(1)(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita for sending obscene messages. The State opposed …

ILIYASHUSSAIN FAKIRMOHAMMAD SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the charges. The Court …

NILKANT JAGESHWAR KASARUJI GAZBHIYEversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Nilkant Jageshwar Kasaruji Gazbhiye, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita after a charge‑sheet was filed for alleged cyber‑fraud offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act. …

DEEPAKBHAI NATVARLAL SONIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Deepakbhai Natvarlal Soni applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11215037260411 alleging offences under Sections 75(1), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The applicant claimed he …

SHUBHAM RAJESHBHAI SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Shubham Rajeshbai Sharma, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) to pre‑empt arrest in connection with an FIR (C.R. No.11210062250053) alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 66‑D of the IT …

VENUSKUMAR KIRITKUMAR PALSANAWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Venus Kumar Kiritkumar Palsanawala, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection against arrest in connection with FIR No.11210047260013 concerning offences under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 54 and 351(3) of …

HITENDRASINH LAVJIBHAI RATHODversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Hitendrasinh Lavjibhai Rathod, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR C.R. No.11211025260168 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2) and 54 of the Bhartiya …

BABUBHAI DEVKARANBHAI NOGOS (RABARI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicants, Babubhai Devkaranbhai Nogos (Rabari) and an associate, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 111(2)(b), 318(4) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. They …

ANISHKUMAR KHODIDASBHAI VADODARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and the Information Technology Amendment Act. The prosecution opposed bail citing the gravity of the offences. The …

MEHULBHAI MAGANBHAI RABARIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Mehulbhai Maganbhai Rabari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in connection with FIR No.11206038260081 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 352, 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita and Section 135 of the Gujarat …

JAYDEEPKUMAR PUNJALAL PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Jaydeepkumar Punjalal Parmar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking protection from arrest in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 67, 85, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 54 of the Bhartiya Nyay …

Jivan Mukhiya @ Jivan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jivan Mukhiya, filed an application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking anticipatory bail in a murder case (PS Case No. 58 of 2025) where he is accused under Sections 103, 238 and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that the …

Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Raju Kumar, husband of the complainant, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging dowry‑related torture, theft of ornaments, and a second marriage under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution’s FIR alleged that the petitioner tortured his wife for dowry demands. …

Bablu Sah @ Bablu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bablu Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case (Gopalpur PS Case No. 258 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, including forcible land …

Anil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Anil Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 147.78 litres of foreign liquor, four cartridges and two motorcycles, alleged under sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, Arms Act and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that the FIR …

Sabir Ansari @ Sabir HussainversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellants, five individuals from Buxar district, were charged under several provisions of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita‑2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting and abusing an informant and his son by invoking their caste name. The appellants filed an appeal under …

Parsidh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioners, three members of the Yadav family, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(1), 126(2), 115(2) and 109(1) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 for allegedly …

Fida HussainversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, relatives of a married couple, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case alleging dowry demand, forced marriage and the administration of poison leading to the death of the informant's daughter. The FIR, …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Santosh Yadav and Mukesh Yadav were named in an FIR for alleged firing in a land dispute, alongside 15 others. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, claiming innocence and noting the FIR shows no victim. The State opposed bail, …

Santosh SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Santosh Sahni, was named in an FIR for alleged assault on an informant's family, with charges under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations were general, omnibus, and that he has a clean antecedent. The State opposed, …

OmiversusThe State of Bihar through Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Omi, was arrested on 31 January 2026 despite a police final report dated 18 April 2025 indicating she was not to be sent to trial in case No.309 of 2024. She filed a criminal writ petition seeking a habeas corpus writ for her release, alleging unlawful detention without a judicial …

Ram Ishwar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ram Ishwar Mahto, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, arising from a land measurement dispute where he was accused of ordering the killing of an informant and his wife. The prosecution …

Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amit Kumar was arrested in connection with a case of looting a Scorpio vehicle and charged under Section 309(6) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He had been in custody since 25 June 2025 and sought bail, arguing that he had a clean antecedent, the investigation was complete, and there was no risk of …

Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chandan Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of a Scorpio vehicle and charged under Section 309(6) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. He was not named in the FIR; his name emerged only from a co‑accused's confessional statement. The prosecution alleged he knowingly purchased the stolen vehicle, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikash Kumar was arrested in connection with a theft of a Scorpio vehicle and has been in custody since 25‑06‑2025, although his name does not appear in the FIR. The prosecution’s case is based mainly on a confessional statement of a co‑accused, Amit Kumar, and there is no evidence that Vikash knew …

Lalan Ram @ Lalan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Lalan Ram and his son Ravi Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case (Darigaon P.S. Case No. 132 of 2025) alleging assault and related offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, …

Sako DeviversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

Petitioners Sako Devi and Gorelal Chauhan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, fearing arrest in a case registered under several sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The FIR alleges that petitioner No.2 assaulted the informant's son …

Khushbu Devi @ Khushbu Kumari GiriversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioners Khushbu Devi and Rajesh Kumar Giri, relatives of co‑accused Anil Giri, were implicated in a case (Taraiya PS Case No. 295 of 2024) involving alleged blackmail, a viral video, and a rape allegation against Anil Giri. They applied for bail, contending that the rape charge pertained only to …

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Anand Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault with a lathi, danda and iron rod, and theft of a gold chain. The petitioner claimed a clean criminal record and argued that the injury to the informant was minor, attributing the dispute to a family quarrel. The prosecution opposed …

SUMIT ANAND S/O RAMLALA RAMNUGRAH JHAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail filed by Sumit Anand under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging cyber‑fraud and money‑laundering offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Information …

Sachin Yadav @ Sachin Kumar Yadav @ Sachin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sachin Yadav, sought bail after being named in an FIR (G.B. Nagar PS Case No. 331 of 2025) for offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault with a deadly weapon. He contended that the FIR does not specifically allege any overt act by him and that the matter …