Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7
The landlord, Joginder Pal, filed an eviction petition under Section 13(3)(a)(ii) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, claiming the premises were needed for the office of his chartered‑accountant son. The tenant, Naval Kishore Behal, occupied the premises for non‑residential purposes …
The landlords (Bajorias) sought eviction of the tenants (Burmans) from a shop under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 on grounds of non‑payment of rent and personal requirement. The tenants had repeatedly sent the monthly rent by postal money order to one co‑owner, …
The landlord (respondent) filed an eviction suit (Title Suit No. 100 of 1980) against the tenant (appellant) alleging default in payment of rent. During the pendency of a second appeal in the High Court arising from an earlier eviction suit, the landlord obtained an order under Section 15 of the …
The widowed plaintiff and her children sued Dutta Cycle Stores for eviction under Section 11(1)(d) of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947, alleging arrears of rent for February 1974 and May‑August 1974. The trial court and the appellate courts found that rent for …
The appellants, owners of premises in Ranchi, leased the property to the respondents for 20 years, a lease that expired on 31 July 1971. The respondents gave a notice on 16 July 1971 claiming a month‑to‑month tenancy and the appellants filed an application under section 12 of the Bihar Buildings …
In a suit for eviction under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947, the landlord sought to have the tenant's defence struck off for failing to deposit rent as ordered under Section 11A. The trial judge refused to strike off the defence, but the High Court reversed that …
The appellant, a tenant, was sued for eviction by the respondents under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 on grounds of personal requirement (to open a clinic) and alleged rent default for three months. The trial court ordered eviction, and the appellate court …
