Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9
The petitioner, a retired headmaster, challenged the deduction of 5% of his pension for three years imposed by the Education Department of Bihar, alleging that the departmental proceeding under Rule 43(B) of the Bihar Pension Rules was initiated without a prior show‑cause notice and violated …
Ishwar Dayal filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several officials. The petitioner sought the court's permission to withdraw the writ petition so that he could pursue a statutory appeal under Rule 23 of the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005. The …
Dr. Ranjan Kumar Singh challenged a 100% pension forfeiture order issued by the Bihar Health Department under Memo No.1093(9) dated 03.10.2025, alleging that the disciplinary proceeding was initiated without a charge sheet, violated the Bihar CCA Rules and principles of natural justice, and suffered …
The petitioner, a Bihar Information Officer, was disciplined for alleged delay in obtaining post‑facto approval for an Independence Day advertisement in 2016‑17. After a departmental proceeding was initiated in 2021, he was shown a charge‑memo, faced an inquiry, and was punished by withholding two …
The petitioner, Uday Shankar Pathak, filed a writ petition challenging a suspension memo (Memo No.22) and a departmental proceeding memo (Memo No.23) issued by health department officials, as well as an enquiry report dated 31.08.2016. He sought quashing of these orders and a mandamus directing …
Ajay Kumar, a peon in the Public Health Sub‑Division, Sitamarhi, challenged Office Order No.60 dated 17‑12‑2018 issued by the Assistant Engineer which stopped his salary increments for over three years. He alleged that the order violated the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005 and the principles of natural …
The petitioner, a Sub‑Inspector of Police, challenged a disciplinary order that forfeited six months of increment and a subsequent appellate rejection, alleging that he was not given a second show‑cause notice and was denied a chance to represent against the enquiry report, violating Rule 17 of the …
Petitioner Kumar Manish challenged a suspension order issued under Memo No. 243 dated 15.03.2022, invoking Rule 9(3)(ii) of the Bihar CCA Rules, 2005. He filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash the suspension instead of filing an appeal. The Court observed that Rule 23 of the same Rules …
Michael Francis and Sujeet Kumar, both former employees of the Bihar School Examination Board, challenged their dismissal and compulsory retirement orders respectively, alleging procedural irregularities in the departmental enquiry. They contended that the memo of charge lacked a list of witnesses …
