Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Examination Act

4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4

Vikash Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Vikash Kumar Mahto applied for bail after an FIR was lodged under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.) and the Bihar Examination Act for alleged impersonation in the CTET exam, where Roshan Yadav allegedly appeared in his place. The petitioner contended that the case …

Jitendra Kumar @ Jitendra Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Jitendra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in connection with a case alleging he facilitated a fraudulent appearance in a constable recruitment examination in exchange for Rs 5 lakh. The prosecution alleged that the informant, Chottu, confessed …

Nigam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nigam Kumar and Anil Kumar, were arrested for allegedly impersonating candidates in a written constable examination, charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, 2023 and the Bihar Examination Act. They applied for bail, contending innocence, lack of …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mukesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Bihar P.S. No. 412 of 2014) for allegedly impersonating himself in a Sipahi recruitment examination, an offence under IPC sections 419 and 420 and Section 10 of the Bihar Examination Act. He claimed he was ill and could not …