Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950

19 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

KALI PRASAD AGARWALLA & OTHERSversusBHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED & OTHERS

1989 INSC 11631 March 1989Dismissed

The plaintiffs, K.P. Agarwala and others, claimed a homestead right over leasehold land based on a 1949 lease. The respondent, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, contended that the land formed part of a colliery that had vested in the Central Government under the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973, and that the lease was

BHAIYA RAMANUJ PRATAP DEOversusLALU MAHESHANUJ PRATAP DEO & ORS. AND VICE-VERSA

1981 INSC 15126 August 1981Disposed off

Bhaiya Rudra Pratap Deo, holder of the impartible Nagaruntari estate, executed an unregistered maintenance (khorposh) deed in 1952 granting eight villages to his brother’s son, Lalu Maheshanuj. The plaintiff alleged fraud and that the deed was void under Section 12A of the Chota Nagpur Encumbered Estates Act and the Bi

MONNET ISPAT & ENERGY LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2012 INSC 30526 July 2012Dismissed

The appellants, companies engaged in iron and steel production, entered into Memorandums of Understanding with the State Government of Jharkhand for mining leases of iron ore in the Ghatkuri area. The State Government recommended their applications to the Central Government for prior approval. However, upon discovering

AJIT KUMAR SINGH AND ORS.versusCHIRANJIBI LAL AND ORS.

2002 INSC 15920 March 2002Disposed off

The appellants, tenants, were ordered to vacate premises under the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982. After the trial decree and a dismissed first appeal, they filed a second appeal in the Patna High Court, but neither they nor their counsel appeared at the hearing. The High Court nonetheless

BALESHWAR TEWARI (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusSHEO JATAN TIWARY AND ORS.

1997 INSC 29920 March 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent purchased three bighas and six kathas of land from the Raja Dumraon Raj in 1957 and filed a suit for declaration of title. The appellant claimed he had been in possession of the land as a lessee since 1925 and the trial court dismissed the suit, finding the appellant to be a raiyat. The Subordinate Judge

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, PATNAversusRAGHUBIR NARAIN SINGH

1984 INSC 3920 February 1984Dismissed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Patna, appealed against the assessment of Raghubir Narain Singh's net wealth under the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The issues concerned how to value assets and debts, including pending decree amounts and agricultural income‑tax liabilities, for computing net wealth under Section 7 and Section 

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, BIHAR, PATNAversusMAHARAJA KUMAR KAMAL SINGH

1984 INSC 3820 February 1984Dismissed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bihar appealed against the Patna High Court’s decision that Maharaja Kumar Kamal Singh’s right to receive compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act should be valued at nil because of arrears of agricultural income‑tax. The central issue was whether such tax arrears could be deducted

RAMESH BEJOY SHARMA AND ORS.versusPASHUPATI RAI AND ORS.

1979 INSC 12117 July 1979Dismissed

The plaintiff, an intermediary landlord, sued the respondents, tenants‑at‑will, for possession of agricultural land after a notification under Section 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 had vested the plaintiff's estate in the State. The trial court held the plaintiff was in "khas" possession and could evict; the Hi

KESHAB NARAYAN BANERJEE AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

1999 INSC 56516 December 1999Dismissed

The appellants were tried before the Special Judge (Vigilance), Patna, for alleged fraud in obtaining a Rs. 2 crore compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950. They contended that the offences were committed in respect of a document produced before the Compensation Officer and that, under Section 195(1)(b) of

KARANPURA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA

1995 INSC 89814 December 1995Appeal(s) allowed

Karanpura Development Company Ltd obtained a 999‑year mining lease in 1946, which was terminated when the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 came into force. The company claimed compensation under Section 4(1) of the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition & Development) Act, 1957, relying on a 1963 notification issued under Section

BHARAT COKING COAL LTD.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

1994 INSC 21413 May 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (BCCL) succeeded East India Coal Co. and held a 999‑year mining lease over 627 bighas in Kenduadih, including surface land. A small part of the surface was used for a bazaar and a cinema for workers. The State of Bihar, invoking the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, served a notice under Section 4 de

SHARDA DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

2003 INSC 78 January 2003Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar acquired land and the Collector awarded compensation to Sharda Devi, who claimed title as a raiyat. The State later sought a reference to the civil court under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, asserting that the land actually belonged to the State and that the award was therefore void. T

MAHARAJA CHINTAMANI SARAN NATH SAHDEOversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1999 INSC 4647 October 1999Dismissed

Maharaja Chintamani Saran Nath Sahdeo, a proprietor of mines and minerals, received compensation under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 calculated at three times his net annual income and later accepted an additional payment calculated at ten times the income. The Member, Board of Revenue later reopened the case and or

SMT. LABANYA BALA DEVI AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR PATNA SECRETARIAT, PATNA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 3677 September 1994Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit claiming a Raiyati right over a tank and its surrounding land in Bihulia village, based on a settlement obtained from the former jamindar in 1943. The trial court declared that the appellants held such a right, but the District Judge reversed the decision, holding that the land vested in the

UPENDRA NARAIN SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR

1996 INSC 8397 August 1996Dismissed

The appellant claimed a patta (title deed) for land in Muzaffarpur that he said was granted by the Zamindar on 11 August 1950. The Collector, exercising powers under Section 4(h) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, investigated and concluded that the patta was a fraudulent transfer intended to evade the Act, and there

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX, CALCUTTAversusSMT. ANJAMLI KHAN

1990 INSC 3406 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Commissioner of Wealth Tax assessed wealth tax on Smt. Anjamli Khan for three assessment years, estimating compensation payable for agricultural lands acquired by the State under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. Khan contended that the right to receive such compensation was not an "asset" under Sectio

RAJA SATYENDRA NARAYAN SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

1987 INSC 1505 May 1987Dismissed

The estate of the late Raja Nilkanth Narayan Singh was vested in the State of Bihar under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950. While some mines were being worked under leases and royalties were paid, the successors-in-interest filed a writ petition seeking compensation for coal-bearing areas that had not been exploited at

BRIGHU NATH SAHAY SINGH AND ORS.versusMD. KHALILUR RAHMAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 5364 September 1995Dismissed

The appellants, former land intermediaries, claimed ownership of a 4‑bigha agricultural plot in Begusarai, Bihar, and obtained a decree for possession in the trial court and first appellate court. The Patna High Court reversed, holding that under the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, the land vested in the State because th

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search