Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
14 judgments · newest first · showing 1–14
Petitioner Pratibha Singh filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a land-related order. Counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the writ and instead approach the Bihar Land Tribunal, citing the Tribunal as an alternative efficacious remedy under …
Nand Kumar Prasad filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11‑05‑2026 passed by the Collector‑Cum‑District Magistrate of East Champaran. The petitioner argued that the order could be contested under Section 9 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009, and sought to withdraw the writ. The State …
The petitioners, Bhuneshwar Singh and his son Satendra Kumar, filed a writ application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw the writ and instead pursue the remedy provided under Section 9(3) of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009 for enforcing an order dated 12 September 2018 …
A group of wives filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging an order related to a land dispute. They sought to have the petition transferred to the Bihar Land Tribunal under Section 15 of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009. The Court examined the provision, which excludes writ …
The petitioners, three women who had purchased a parcel of land in Munger district, sought a writ of mandamus from the Patna High Court to restrain respondent No.5, Napali Mahto, from disturbing their possession after he lost a mutation case. They approached the High Court directly instead of filing …
Fudo Devi, the widow of Bihari Yadav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order dated 25‑06‑2016 passed by the Additional Collector and to have her name entered in the revenue records. The petitioner approached the Patna High Court directly, bypassing the …
Shiv Kant Ranjan filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to set aside orders of the Additional Collector and the Land Revenue Development Commissioner and to confirm an order of the Circle Officer. The State argued that a statutory alternative remedy existed under the …
The petitioners, a group of individuals claiming ownership of certain land plots, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its officials to act on their representation dated 02‑03‑2026 and to create Jamabandi in their names. The State argued that …
Smt. Rampari Devi, claiming ownership of 4.36 acres of land based on a 2013 title suit judgment and a 2024 order of the Bihar Land Tribunal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus directing the Circle Officer to fix rent, mutate the land and comply with the Tribunal’s order. The …
The petitioners, Dhaleshwar Sharma and others, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash an order dated 27‑01‑2026 passed by the Collector, Purnea, in a Basgit Parcha revision case, and to set aside a Basgit Parcha issued in favour of other respondents, claiming protection of …
The petitioners, heirs of the late Sokhi Pandit, claimed ownership of land in Madhepura district and alleged that respondent No.8 obtained a Basgit Parcha in his wife's name through forgery and collusion with a Circle Officer. They challenged the Collector's order of 5 January 2019, which upheld the …
The petitioners filed an application seeking relief against several officials of the Consolidation Department. The State counsel informed the court that the interim order in this matter had merged with a final order dated 18 March 2025 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1198 of 2011. That final …
Budhiram Singh filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 10‑Oct‑2014 passed by the Bihar Land Tribunal in BLT Case No. 679 of 2013, which had allowed an application on behalf of respondent 5 challenging earlier orders of the Director of …
Saroj Kumar Rakshit filed a writ petition seeking a certiorari to set aside an order dated 30‑11‑2024 of the Divisional Commissioner that altered the disposition of temple land and also sought a mandamus to protect his possession. The Single Judge dismissed the petition, directing the petitioner to …
