Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act

9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9

Dhirendra RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dhirendra Ray, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case where a mob allegedly obstructed police attempting to arrest another accused. The prosecution alleged that Ray instigated the crowd, leading to assaults on police and injuries. The petitioner contended he was …

Mahesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mahesh Ray was implicated in a FIR alleging assault with firearms and sharp weapons during a land dispute, with charges under several sections of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act and the Arms Act. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, claiming innocence and pointing out that other co-accused in the …

Vinod Kumar Singh @ Binod Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar Singh, was implicated in a theft case (Section 303(2) of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act) after an informant alleged that Rs. 5,51,000 was missing from his drawer when the petitioner was the last person seen with him. The petitioner claimed innocence, asserting he was not …

Kapil Yadav @ Kapildeo YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The appellants, Kapil Yadav, Naresh Yadav and Sanjay Yadav, were charged under sections of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act, 2023 and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly entering an informant's house, harassing his family and using caste-based abusive language. The appellants …

Sanjay PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, three brothers named Sanjay, Sarvesh and Rakesh Pandey, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Nagarik Suraksha Act and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly abusing and assaulting an informant on a field. The informant claimed …

Jakir Alam @ Jakir MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jakir Alam was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case under Sections 96 and 64(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleged to have abducted a girl with the intention of marrying her. The petitioner had been in custody since 17 September 2025 and …

Asha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Asha Devi and Namita Kumari, were implicated in a case (Bikramganj PS Case No. 835 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant and theft of money and jewellery. They claimed innocence, asserting that the allegations were vague and that they have clean antecedents. The State opposed …

Abhishek Kumar @ ChhotuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar, was accused of kidnapping a minor girl, the daughter of an informant, along with co‑accused Pukari Tanti and Ajit Kumar. The prosecution alleged that the girl was seen on a WhatsApp video with the co‑accused on a train after she went missing from her tuition. The …

Md. JafrunversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Jafrun, was named as an accused in a POCSO case because he is the father of the alleged offender, Md. Afzal, who is accused of sexually exploiting Muskan Khatoon under a false pretext of marriage. The petitioner contends that no specific allegation of sexual assault is made …