Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
Manoj Yadav was named in an FIR under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 69.12 litres recovered. He contended that his name was listed solely on suspicion, that the liquor was recovered from an open thatched house …
The petitioner, Ajay Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 575.64 litres of liquor from his joint family house. He claimed he was not arrested at the spot and that the liquor could not be conclusively linked to him, …
The petitioner, Naresh Rai, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 59.7 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, …
The petitioner, Ravesh Kumar Chaudhary, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 1,364.250 litres of liquor from a truck. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had …
