Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Narcotic and Substance (BNSS) Act

44 judgments · newest first · showing 1–44

KALIYAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Kaliyan and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 16‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 13‑10‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 1210 of 2025, which arose from Crime No. 513 of 2024 and alleged offences under Sections 115(2), …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant Shahrukh, charged under the POCSO Act for offences alleged in case crime No. 980 of 2024, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the charge‑sheet and cognizance order. He asserted that he had married the victim on 04‑10‑2024, that they were living together …

IKRAAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 458 of 2025) arising from offences under sections 70(1), 127(2) and 351(3) of the BNSS, on the ground that a verified compromise had been reached with the victim. The trial court had …

Rahul Kumar Yadav @ Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Yadav, was implicated in an excise case after 4 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that the vehicle had been taken by a co‑villager and that no liquor was found in his personal possession, asserting his innocence and clean …

Subodh kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Subodh Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 32.58 litres of liquor recovered from the house of his mother, Meena Devi. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the scene, no liquor was found in his conscious …

Guddu SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Sahani applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to his house. He has three prior criminal cases, two under the Excise Act, and contends that the …

Archana DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Archana Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, she had no conscious …

Bablu ChauhanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bablu Chauhan sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of liquor from locations not belonging to him. The petition relied on the claim that no liquor was found in his possession and the only …

Govinda Sahani @ Govinda KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against them under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016, alleging recovery of 150 litres of liquor from a river bank. They argued that they were not arrested on the …

Guddu Kumar @ Saurabh Kumar @ Guddu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from a public bush, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest. He has six prior criminal cases, five relating to excise offences, but the alleged liquor was not found in …

Pintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Pintu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly manufacturing illicit liquor, with 355.5 litres recovered from a bamboo cluster behind his house. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not in his conscious physical …

Saheb KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Saheb Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 105 litres of liquor from bags kept in front of a temple. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the …

Lalbabu Ram @ Lalbabu Kumar RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalbabu Ram, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 5.8 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which he claims is joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He …

Dipak PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dipak Paswan, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 15 litres of liquor recovered from his joint family house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the concept of …

Bikku Sahani @ Bikku KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Bikku Sahani, a resident of East Champaran, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly recovering 50 litres of liquor from a sack. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the …

Dheeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 46 litres of liquor were recovered from a bush adjacent to his field, with no possession or arrest at the spot. He argued that the police mechanically …

Subhash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 46 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his field. He argued that he was not in possession, the alleged liquor was …

Kishun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Kishun Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the only evidence against him is a confessional statement made by another accused in police custody and that he was not caught in possession of …

Rajendra SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajendra Sinha, was implicated in a case alleging the recovery of five litres of liquor from a school van, alleged to be a violation of Sections 30(a), 32 and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged offence was …

Lavkush @ Bablu Kumar @ Kush KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lavkush, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/2022, alleging recovery of 50 litres of liquor from Mantu Kumar, with whom he has no relation. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no …

Lalu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lalu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for the alleged recovery of 448.980 litres of liquor from a pick‑up vehicle he owned. He was not arrested at the spot and claimed that the liquor was not in his …

Pappu SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pappu Singh, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, where 51.12 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a bag and a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, no …

Madho ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Madho Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after the police registered a case against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 25 litres of liquor from a mango orchard. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, that the liquor was …

Nitish Kumar @ Raushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 17.250 litres of liquor recovered from an auto. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no …

Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Yadav @ DhisnaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 210.6 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from four vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no possession …

Vinda Rai @ Binda RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vinda Rai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 33 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 180 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He contended that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and that the liquor was not …

Ravan Manjhi @ Ram PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravan Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 832 litres of spirit from his dalan. He argued that the alleged seizure was not from his immediate possession, the dalan …

Dhanesh RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhanesh Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 7 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was located in a joint‑family house, he had no conscious possession, and …

Ful Mohammad @ Md. Wasim AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ful Mohammad (Md. Wasim Alam), feared arrest in a case (PS‑Dagarua Case No. 288 of 2025) for allegedly possessing 8.250 litres of liquor recovered from an auto, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. He asserted that he has a clean …

Munna RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Munna Rai, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly recovering 60 litres of liquor and 4,000 kg of Mahua solution, which were destroyed at the spot. He was not arrested at the scene and the …

Kunti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kunti Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, where 80 litres of liquor was recovered, 35 litres allegedly from her house. She argued she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor …

Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeet Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 25 litres of liquor were recovered from his under‑construction house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, that the …

Mahip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahip Kumar, the owner of a motorcycle and an auto, faced arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 after 300 litres of liquor were recovered from those vehicles. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the …

Deepak KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of 180 litres of a liquor-like substance. He was not arrested at the scene and no contraband was found in his possession; the allegation rests on …

Raju Chaurasiya @ Raju Kumar ChaurasiyaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Chaurasiya, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 345.600 litres of liquor from a Bolero pick‑up. He contended that he was not arrested on …

Ajay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, where 10 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from two motorcycles. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged recovery of large quantities of liquor from two vehicles, one of which he owned. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor, had a clean …

Sandil Kumar @ Shandilya RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sandil Kumar and Navin Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act concerning alleged recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. They argued that no liquor was found in their conscious …

Raju Rai @ Raju KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raju Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 33 and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 280 litres of spirit were recovered from a bush near his house but not from his possession. He argued that the …

Lal Bihari Mukhiya @ Lalbihari NishadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Lal Bihari Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 23,400 litres of liquor from a plastic sack. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the …

Aman Kumar @ AmanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aman Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case of illegal trading and manufacturing of illicit liquor (Case No. 14 of 2022) under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, after the recovery of …

Pattu Ram @ Mantu RamversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Pattu Ram, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly recovering 69.12 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his …