Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (BNSS)

13 judgments · newest first · showing 1–13

SUNIL CHAHAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceeding in a criminal case alleging offences under Section 351(2) of the BNSS and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act. They contended that no offence was disclosed …

JAIMANGAL MANJHIversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jaimangal Manjhi was arrested on 16 February 2026 in connection with a case involving the alleged illegal possession of 83 litres of country‑made liquor, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and …

Jivan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Jivan Kumar was arrested on 2 March 2026 in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for alleged possession of 498 litres of country‑made liquor, of which 117 litres were seized from his hut and the remainder from a motorcycle belonging to an unknown …

Ankit Kumar Singh @ Ankit Singh @ Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

Ankit Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case under the NDPS Act for alleged possession of 258.75 grams of contraband, alleged to be a commercial quantity. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that the seizure was not made in compliance with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic …

Ful Mohammad @ Fool MohammadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ful Mohammad, was arrested on 15 January 2026 in connection with a case involving the seizure of 3,447.36 litres of foreign liquor from a vehicle. He was charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, but the seizure was not from his conscious possession; …

Sunil AhirwarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Sunil Ahirwar was arrested on 8 January 2026 in connection with a case involving the seizure of 353.55 litres of foreign liquor, alleged to violate Sections 30(a), 32(1) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018. The petitioner argued that he has a clean criminal record, that the …

Lakshman paswanversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The petitioners, Lakshman Paswan, Beena Devi and Rupesh Kumar Paswan, feared arrest in a murder case (Amarpur P.S. Case No.55 of 2025) filed under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused had killed the deceased, who was a relative of …

Wasim Akram @ Wasim Alam @ Washim Akaram @ Washim AlamversusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The petitioner, Wasim Akram, was charged under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act (BNSS) for allegedly abducting and marrying a minor girl. The victim gave two statements: an earlier one under Section 180 BNSS and a later one under Section 183 BNSS, alleging that the …

Sunil RajbanshiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The Patna High Court considered an application for anticipatory bail filed by Sunil Rajbanshi, who was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor and 3000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution near Kolwa …

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for the alleged recovery of 16,500 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of …

Saroj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Saroj Kumar was arrested after police stopped a car carrying 5.6 kg of charas-like material, which they recovered from the vehicle, not from his person. He contended that he was neither the owner nor the driver, that the seizure list lacked his signature, and that the police failed to comply with …

Saroj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Saroj Kumar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that 60.48 litres of liquor were recovered from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present …

Raj KishoreversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kishore, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 130 litres of liquor near a school. He argued he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not recovered from his possession, and the …