Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar National Security Act (BNSS)

6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6

MO ANEESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Mo Anees, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking discharge of criminal proceedings (Special Session Case No. 47/2025, Offence No. 565/2024) that had been ordered to proceed by the Special Judge under the Poxo Act. The applicant's counsel argued that no offence was …

GULNAZ BANOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The applicant, Gulnaz Bano, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Kanpur to decide a pending complaint under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act filed in 2018. The applicant argued that the case had been …

SURAJ HARIJANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Suraj Harijan filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 11244 of 2023) instituted against him for offences under Sections 376, 452 and 506 of the IPC. He contended that the FIR was originally lodged for offences under Sections 452 and 354, …

DURGA PRASAD ALIAS BATUA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 18‑01‑2025 and the summons issued in Crime No. 189 of 2024, alleging that the FIR was filed with an unexplained three‑day delay and that there was no medical evidence of injury. The State …

RASHMI PATRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rashmi Patra filed a transfer application seeking to move a criminal proceeding from the Court No.‑01, Mathura to the Court No.‑01, Varanasi, invoking Section 173(4) of the BNSS and also requesting permission to appear via video‑conferencing. The applicant argued that video‑conferencing would serve …

OM PRAKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The appellant, Om Prakash, appealed a trial court order that rejected his application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS, filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The dispute concerned a boundary wall and pillar, with a related civil suit pending, and …