Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar National Security Act

15 judgments · newest first · showing 1–15

VASHU DEV MANJHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act filed by Vashu Dev Manjhi seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑04‑2025, the cognizance order dated 04‑07‑2025 and the entire proceedings of case no. 97720 of 2025. The applicant alleged false …

SURENDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Surendra Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar National Security Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 09‑11‑2011, the cognizance order dated 07‑12‑2011, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.341 of 2011) on the ground that he was falsely implicated and that …

CHANDRAWATI DEVI @ CHANARAUTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandrawati Devi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a criminal complaint (Section 316(2) BNSS) filed against her in a criminal case arising from a dispute over Rs 1,00,000 transferred to her bank account. She alleged that the dispute was …

AASHU SAINI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the FIR and related proceedings arising from a criminal case (Criminal No. 225/2025). They argued that no offence was made out against them and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined the submissions …

ISTKARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC by Mohd Wasim, who feared arrest in a criminal case (Crime No 158 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 110, 352, 351(2) and 117(2) of the BNSS. The State’s Additional Advocate General objected, …

AVKASH MAURYA AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Avkash Maurya and eight others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 29 July 2026 that alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Bihar National Security Act (BNSS). The State, …

CHANDRASHEKHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, a shop‑keeper, was named in an FIR alleging assault, molestation, offences under the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, the cognizance order and to stay the trial, claiming he was falsely implicated, …

RAM BHAWANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

The revisionist alleged that after a dispute in which a wall and door were broken, he was booked for breach of peace, released on bail, and subsequently assaulted by the opposite parties who attempted to throw him into a well. He sought to lodge an FIR for the assault, but the police failed to …

LOKENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Lokendra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the Session Judge's order dated 16‑03‑2026 that rejected his request to place a newspaper dated 28‑03‑2022 on record. The trial court had already heard the defence and was about to pronounce judgment in a …

MOHD. SHAHIDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohd Shahid, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking relief from criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the IPC and from two NBW orders dated 17‑03‑2023 and 23‑03‑2026. He contended that the NBW orders were improperly issued and requested a stay of …

ANIL KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Anil Kumar Verma, who was implicated in a FIR alleging fraud in Army recruitment under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406. The applicant claimed false implication, had no criminal …

VIJAY PATEL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 01.04.2006 and the related criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 263 of 2006). The court examined the complaint and found that the allegations disclosed a cognizable offence and were …

BABULAL AND 10 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad heard an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Babulal and ten others seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the entire criminal proceedings against them. The applicants, not pressing any substantive relief, requested that the court direct them to surrender …

RAJEEV KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 05.12.2025 passed by the Sessions Judge, Etah, alleging that the trial court proceeded despite an interim protection order dated 21.12.2022 issued by this Court. The interim order protected the …

Virendra Kumar Ray @ RamanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Virendra Kumar Ray was arrested on 25 June 2025 in connection with a robbery alleged under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, where a motorcycle gang allegedly seized a bag containing Rs. 2,48,613 and documents. The petitioner claimed he was not named in the FIR and was falsely implicated, but …