Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable/Criminal Procedure (BNSS)

7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7

Yogendra ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Yogendra Thakur, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act involving alleged recovery of 889.2 litres of liquor from a truck and a motorcycle. He contended that he was not in possession of the seized vehicles, was not the owner, and …

Sanjay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 34 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 5.7 litres of liquor from a public road. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the location did …

Brijesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brijesh Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 31.98 litres of liquor from a motorcycle registered in his wife's name. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no liquor in his …

Rishikesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rishikesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 110.7 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious …

Sabita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Sabita Devi and Indal Manjhi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where police recovered 20 litres of liquor from their house and 8 litres from a co‑accused. They argued they have clean antecedents, the liquor was in a joint family …

Rahul Kumar @ Rahul RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from a location behind his shop and another shop. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, the alleged recovery site did not …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar, the owner of a Scorpio vehicle, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from his vehicle. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, was not arrested at the spot, and that his nephew Hira Lal had …