Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act (BNSS)

24 judgments · newest first · showing 1–24

PREETIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Preeti, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 16 March 2026 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, which directed the transfer of a disputed amount from her account to the second opposite party in a criminal case (Crime No. 221 of …

AMAN VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Aman Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 26‑12‑2025, the cognizance and summoning order dated 24‑02‑2026, and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 10345 of 2026) alleging false implication and lack of prima facie …

SHANKY ANANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Shanky Anand filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑11‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 24‑03‑2026 in a criminal case (Case No.30 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 108 and 351(2) BNS. He contended that he was falsely …

Amar Chaudhary @ DomaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Amar Chaudhary was arrested on 24 February 2026 in connection with an FIR dated 16 January 2026 alleging violation of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018 for the recovery of 200 litres of illicit country-made liquor. The petitioner contended that the liquor was recovered from …

Sobha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

WITHDRAWN

Sobha Devi, convicted in 2014 and whose conviction was affirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge in 2025, filed a criminal revision under Sections 438 and 442 of the BNSS without having surrendered to the court. The State objected, noting the absence of a surrender certificate, and the petitioner …

Munna Quraishi @ Munna MiyaversusThe State Of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, ten individuals from the Quraishi family, were charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with an alleged caste‑based assault on Sugandhi Devi. They appealed the Special Judge’s refusal to grant …

Smt Rekha Ray (Mandal) @ Srimati Rekha RayversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Rekha Ray and Anjali Ray, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the FIR was based on a civil dispute over a land sale agreement, where the informant claimed they delayed execution of …

Deepak Kumar @ AaravversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, sought relief fearing arrest in a cyber‑police case alleging cheating of Rs.2,00,000 using the informant's thumb impression under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution alleged the fraud, while the petitioner claimed …

Shambhu YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shambhu Yadav petitioned the Patna High Court seeking bail in a 2003 case (Sections 302, 34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act) alleging his involvement in a murder. He argued that the police investigation found no incriminating evidence, as reflected in the original charge‑sheet (14‑09‑2003) and a …

Goutam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

PARTLY ALLOWED (DISPOSAL)

The appellants Goutam Kumar and Bittu Kumar appealed under Section 14A(2) of the SC/ST Act against the refusal of anticipatory bail by the Exclusive Special Judge. The FIR alleged that they were part of a mob that assaulted the informant's daughter and later the informant, using caste-based insults …

Kamlesh Kumar MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Kamlesh Kumar Mehta, was charged under several IPC sections and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant and using caste-based abuse in a land dispute. The informant claimed to belong to a SC/ST community, while the …

Shashikant Mishra @ Shashi Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shashikant Mishra and Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, sought anticipatory bail in a cheating case (Section 420 IPC) filed by Sunil Kumar Tiwari. They claimed innocence, argued the matter was a civil dispute, and offered to return Rs. 60,000 to the complainant without admitting guilt. The …

Raju SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Raju Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Bettiah Muffasil P.S. No.21 of 2025) involving alleged offences under sections 308(4), 308(5), 140(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and section 25(9) of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the …

Prabhakar KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Prabhakar Kumar, accused under sections 85, 395 of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act and section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for alleged dowry‑related assault, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 219 of 2024. He claimed innocence and a clean …

Shambhu Nath GhoshversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shambhu Nath Ghosh, a retired branch manager of Vijaya Bank, faced a complaint (Case No. 250C/2023) alleging offences under Sections 420 and 467 of the IPC for allegedly taking signatures for a bank loan, failing to disburse the loan and not returning land documents, which led to a notice from the …

Ashok Kumar KushwahaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four individuals, feared arrest in connection with Patkhauli Police Station Case No. 74 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act, the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, and Bihar Minerals Rules, 2019, for …

Arvind Kumar Yadav @ Arbind Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Arvind Kumar Yadav, a former branch manager of the Khagaria District Central Co‑operative Bank, was implicated in a fraud case (PS No. 167 of 2024) alleging that Rs 4,70,176 deposited by a shopkeeper through an agent, Mithilesh Kumar, was misappropriated. The petitioner contended that he had …

Md. Parvej @ Md. Parvej Alam @ Md. Parwez AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Parvej, was arrested in connection with a narcotics case (Araria P.S. Case No. 524 of 2023) under Sections 21, 22 and 23 of the NDPS Act after a co‑accused’s confessional statement named him as an associate. No narcotic substance was recovered from the petitioner’s possession and …

Parvej AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Parvej Alam, was named in an FIR for offences under Sections 341, 323, 376, 504, 34 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging a physical relationship with the minor daughter of the informant under a false pretext of marriage. The petitioner contended that the …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Kumar and Kundan Kishore were arrested in connection with a complaint alleging offences under several IPC sections arising from a Rs 45 lakh land transaction. They contended that the sale deed was executed by Asha Devi, their mother‑in‑law, and that the dispute was essentially civil. The State …

Ramesh Prasad SinhaversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants Ramesh Prasad Sinha, Punam Devi and Atul Kumar Sinha appealed against the refusal of anticipatory bail in a case filed under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Indian Penal Code and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The informant, Jyoti Kumari, alleged caste‑based abuse, …

BHUPESHKUMAR CHANDULAL TRIVEDIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

97-DISPOSED AS TRANSFER TO DISTRICT/SESSION COURT N.I. ACT.

The complainant appealed an acquittal granted by the trial court in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …

Kanhaiya Lal KesariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Lal Kesari, was named in a criminal complaint (No. 13930C of 2022) alleging offences under Sections 418 and 420 of the IPC for failing to return a Rs.10 lakh loan made under an agreement dated 12‑04‑2018. The agreement, including a security cheque, was not contested, though …