Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Raj Kumar Gupta, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 11.625 liters of liquor recovered from his scooty. He argued that he was not in possession at the time of seizure and that the vehicle was misused by his neighbour, Piyush, …
Divya Kumari, a woman with a clean criminal record, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that the liquor was not in her conscious possession and …
The petitioner, Santu Yadav, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He was not caught in possession of the liquor and claimed he was unaware that his friend misused the vehicle. The petitioner …
Mithun Kumar was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 128 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, Ratan, misused his …
The petitioner, Virendra Kunwar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2.520 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware that a person named …
The petitioner, Bhim Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a paddy field not belonging to him. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was communal, and …
