Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioners, Gangesh Sahni and Suraj Kumar, were named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor, with 30 litres recovered. They argued that the liquor was seized from an open pit accessible to the public, not from their conscious possession, and that the seizure list …
The petitioner, Devpari Devi, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with 99 litres of liquor seized. Counsel argued that the liquor was recovered from an open orchard, not in the petitioner's …
The petitioner, Sanjit Rai, was implicated in an excise case for alleged illegal manufacture and transport of illicit liquor, though his name does not appear in the FIR. The prosecution alleged that he owned the motorcycle used to carry nine litres of liquor, but the recovery was not from his …
The petitioner, Brahmadev Yadav, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacture and transport of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, with 22 litres of liquor recovered. He contended that the motorcycle used to carry the liquor was registered in his …
Manjit Kumar, a resident of Dhusar village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 310(2) and 311 of the BNS. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, but his name appeared in the confessional statement of co‑accused Subham Kumar, who was already on regular …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 35.395 litres of liquor from his sister's house. He argued that he was not arrested on the …
