Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
12 judgments · newest first · showing 1–12
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly recovering 2,060 litres of liquor from two vehicles, though he claimed no ownership of the vehicles and a clean criminal record. He sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar …
Petitioner Rajendra Ray sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 16.98 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued that the liquor was not in his possession and that the …
Manish Kumar was apprehended in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 92.250 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, he was not the owner of the vehicle, and the case was based solely on an informant’s tip without …
The petitioner, Munna Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 52 litres of liquor and 250 litres of Mahua from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession or knowledge of the …
The petitioner, Rasendra Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 190 litres of liquor near a cremation ground. He argued that he was not caught in possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the case was based …
The petitioner, Virendra Singh, was implicated in an excise case for allegedly transporting 861.6 litres of liquor in a truck he owned, though the liquor was seized from the vehicle and not from his personal possession. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing he had a clean criminal record and was …
The petitioner, Bisho Sharma, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Srinagar PS Case No. 63 of 2025) involving alleged violations of Sections 25(1‑B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution’s case rested solely on statements of two co‑accused who claimed Sharma supplied ten live …
The petitioner, Ritik Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged seizure of 538.920 litres of liquor from a Scorpio vehicle. He contended that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not …
The petitioner, Om Prakash Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 790.56 litres of liquor from an orchard not owned by him, claiming he was implicated solely on the basis of a chowkidar's information without any material seized from his …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly having 100 litres of liquor recovered from his courtyard. He argued that the liquor was stored in a joint‑family house, that he had no …
The petitioner, Banti Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 20 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware that another …
Munna Chaudhary applied for anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 105 litres of liquor from his residence, which he claims is a joint family property and that he had no conscious possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to …
