Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
11 judgments · newest first · showing 1–11
The appellants, a group of men from the Pandit family, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several sections of the Bihar Penal Code for allegedly assaulting an informant and her son over a wage dispute at the informant's house. The trial …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kumar Sharma, sought anticipatory bail in a case where 153 litres of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from a vehicle he had sold to Rakesh Kumar on 28 September 2025. The offence alleged is under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, …
The appellants, a group of villagers, were charged under Sections 191(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) and 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly demolishing a temple wall and assaulting …
The petitioners, Dhanayee Sah and his sons Vishal Kumar and Vivek Kumar, applied to withdraw an anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner No.1, seeking to surrender and obtain regular bail. The court allowed the withdrawal and directed that if petitioner No.1 surrenders within four weeks, …
The petitioners, three residents of Rangpura, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act (B.N.S.S) for alleged assault and theft. They contended that the FIR was vague, the informant had a family dispute, and the petitioners …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Rai, was implicated in a land‑dispute related assault case (Daraunda P.S. Case No. 592 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S.S. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the informant’s family with weapons, causing …
The petitioner, Thakan Jadav, was implicated in a land‑dispute incident where the informant alleged that he assaulted the informant's son with an iron rod and that another accused, Laltu Yadav, injured the son with a tractor. The petitioner contended that the injury to the son’s head was …
The petitioners, Gauri Shankar Sah and Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S. for allegedly purchasing looted articles from co‑accused who were arrested. The FIR originally named five unknown persons, and the petitioners' names …
The petitioner, Ranveer Kumar, was implicated in a criminal case (Barahiya P.S. Case No.279/2024) alleging offences including assault, outraging modesty, robbery and illegal possession of arms. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with co‑accused, entered the informant’s house while …
The appellants, Nilam Devi, Amit Kumar, Sumit Kumar and Parmanand Singh, appealed against the trial court's refusal to grant anticipatory bail under Section 14‑A(2) of the SC/ST Act. The informant, Brajesh Paswan, alleged that the appellants assaulted him, used caste slurs, attempted to strangle …
Aashma Khatoon applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (Gwalpara P.S. Case No. 193 of 2024) involving alleged conspiracy of 23 persons, including her, under Sections 103(1), 61, 3(5) of the B.N.S.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that four persons …
