Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Sanhita

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

RAMRAJ YADAV ALIAS RAJA RAM YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ramraj Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 29‑03‑2025 in Criminal Case No.202 of 2025, which was based on a charge‑sheet filed by the investigating officer under Sections 324(5) and 351(3) of …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Sachin filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order in case 38659 of 2026, which was based on a charge‑sheet filed by the police for offences under Sections 352 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The applicant contended that these offences are …

Raju Yadav @ Raju Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Raju Yadav and Rajesh Yadav, filed a restoration application for Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.5358/2024, which had been dismissed for non‑compliance. The High Court examined Section 403 of the Bihar Negotiable Sanhita, which generally prohibits alteration of a final judgment except for …