Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bihar Negotiable Securities Act

196 judgments · newest first · showing 1–196

ALATMASH MALIK @ KURBANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Alatmash Malik, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case (Crime No. 250 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Section 353(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) and Section 66 of the Information …

KAMLESH BHARTIYAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Kamlesh Bhartiya, who was arrested in Crime No. 412 of 2026 under Sections 109(1) and 115(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed out that a similarly situated co‑accused, Neeraj Bhartiya, had already been granted …

JEETUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jeetu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging an order dated 02‑12‑2024 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant's counsel argued …

SARVANAND PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 25‑01‑2025 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 28‑03‑2026 in Criminal Case No.3697 of 2026. They contended that the offences alleged under Sections 115(2), 352 and …

Parshuram SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Parshuram Singh and Nanhaku Singh, sought relief from arrest in a 2017 case alleging offences under several IPC sections and the Arms Act. They claimed innocence, arguing that no injury report existed and that the prosecution’s allegations were not specifically linked to them. The …

Sujit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sujit Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 45 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that …

Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep ChandrabanshiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The appellants, Pradeep Kumar and Navin Kumar, were charged under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for allegedly threatening an informant after drinking. They sought anticipatory bail, arguing …

ISTAKHAR @ TARO AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Istakhar @ Taro and his son in a case alleging assault with lathi and danda under Sections 115(2), 352, 333 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The applicants argued that they had no prior criminal …

SMT ARCHANA TIWARI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Archana Tiwari and another, filed a recall application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act seeking to set aside an order dated 13‑04‑2026 that had dismissed their earlier application. The High Court recalled that order and restored the application to its …

Manoj DasversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Manoj Das, a 20‑year‑old resident of Jharkhand, was charged under Sections 318(4), 319(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, Sections 66, 66(C), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act and Sections 336(3), 337 and 338 of the same Act. He applied for bail after an earlier bail application was …

Mithun SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithun Sahni, sought anticipatory bail after learning of a pending case under Sections 30(a) and 32(1), (2) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a public bush. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location did not belong …

Gayatri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Gayatri Devi sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 26 litres of liquor from a wall of Vikas Bhawan, a public place. The petitioner argued she had no possession of the liquor, the alleged location did …

Shiv Dular PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shiv Dular Paswan applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor and 150‑200 litres of semi‑prepared liquor from a hut not owned by him. The …

Sanoj ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanoj Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, the liquor was not found in his possession, and he was unaware that …

Rekha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Rekha Devi, a resident of Bettiah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from a location adjacent to her house. The petitioner argued that no liquor was found in her possession, the FIR was based on …

Raj Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Raj Kumar Mahto, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 99 litres of liquor. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, the alleged recovery site was public, and the FIR was based on …

Kishori Prasad YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kishori Prasad Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 69.120 litres of liquor in his Bolero vehicle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and …

Nitesh Sah @ Nitish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, four brothers from Madarpur, filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case (PS No. 589 of 2024) alleging assault on an informant's family under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. The prosecution contended that the petitioners were involved in …

Rajesh ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rajesh Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a location behind Raju Manjhi's house. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, and was …

Shankar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Shankar Paswan and Mithun Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 395 of 2022, which involves offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners participated in an assault on an …

Balinder Ray @ Sunil KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balinder Ray, sought anticipatory bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that he was not arrested on the spot, had no possession of the seized liquor, and was implicated solely on a confessional statement made by another person in police custody. He …

Manju DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manju Devi, a resident of Rewan village, was implicated in a case (PS No. 907/2025) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor concealed near her house. She pleaded that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was not found in her …

Sikendra Yadav @ SiKandar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Sikendra Yadav and his son Pankaj Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 210 litres of liquor from the bank of the Tilawe River. They argued they have no prior …

Sudhanshu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhanshu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 15 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the vehicle, and that the case was based solely on a …

ADITYA RAJversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Aditya Raj, was implicated in a recruitment fraud case (Airport P.S. Case No.28 of 2019) alleging forgery and cheating under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471, based on a mismatch between his thumb impression and the original sample. He claimed innocence, stating that a …

Sanjog DhangarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjog Dhangar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case where 60 litres of illicit liquor was recovered from an open area behind his house, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed innocence, asserting that the open space is accessible …

Avinash Kumar @ Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Avinash Kumar, the owner of Welcome Hotel, feared arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act after 590 ml of liquor and empty bottles were recovered from two rooms of his hotel. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and that …

Kishore SahniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kishore Sahni was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged possession of 420 litres of illicit liquor recovered from an open area called Murahi Diyara. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and had no connection with the recovered …

Dilip Kumar Singh @ Dilip KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dilip Kumar Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 19.650 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that he was merely the …

Sunil ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sunil Manjhi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 170 litres of liquor and 500 litres of jaggery solution from a public canal area. He argued that he had no possession of the contraband, the site did not belong to …

RAHUL KUMAR CHAUHAN @ RAHUL KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Chauhan, sought pre‑arrest bail for offences alleged under several IPC sections, alleging he was falsely implicated due to village politics and enmity. The FIR claimed he and others intercepted an informant’s auto and assaulted him with iron rods and a pistol, causing a …

Baudhi Devi @ Shanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Baudhi Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of five litres of liquor from her residence. She argued that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was found in a joint family house, …

Sanjay Kumar sahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Sah, was appointed as a GDS BPM at Lalit Narayan Mahavidyalaya University based on a forged Class‑10 certificate. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board later verified that the certificate was counterfeit, leading to his termination from service on 4 February 2026. He was …

Prakash Kumar @ Om Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, applied for regular bail in a case under Section 366(A) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging he enticed a minor for marriage. The prosecution alleged that the minor disappeared and was allegedly taken by the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the victim’s statement …

Sushil Sharma @ Sushil Kumar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sushil Sharma, sought bail in a kidnapping case (PS Case No. 48 of 2024) where he was alleged to have participated in the abduction of a minor under IPC sections 363, 366(A), 34, the SC/ST (POA) Act and the POCSO Act. He contended that the FIR was filed after an inordinate delay, …

Manish Bharti @ Manish Kumar Bharti @ Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manish Bharti sought anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 70,500 litres of liquor from a scooty. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle, was not the owner, and that the case …

Md. Perwez @ Md. ParwezversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Perwez, was implicated in a 2019 recruitment fraud case involving alleged cheating in a police and fire service driver exam, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed a clean record, ignorance of the case until 2025, and argued that arrest would …

Balraj Singh @ Bhuntun SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Balraj Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 324 litres of liquor from a bush. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, the liquor was not in his possession, and the complaint …

Dadan Ram @ Dadan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Dadan Ram, a headmaster, was accused of defalcating admission and registration fees of 116 students, allegedly preventing them from appearing for examinations. He contended that the fees were deposited with the Bihar School Examination Board, that the registration portal was not operational, and …

Garib PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Garib Paswan sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (Singhaul P.S. Case No. 158 of 2025) for alleged discrepancies in his Fair Price Shop's stock, alleged violations of Section 316(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, and …

Nidhi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Nidhi Devi, Ajay Kumar and Manisha Devi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a theft case (PS Case No. 342 of 2025) involving a missing gold chain. The FIR named no specific accused; the petitioners were implicated solely on the basis of a co‑accused’s confessional statement, …

Dayanand YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, five Yadavs from Jamui district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023. They contended that the FIR does not specifically allege any assault or abuse by them and that they have been …

Babar AliversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Babar Ali, the owner of a pickup vehicle, was implicated in the seizure of 1,305 litres of liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had no knowledge of the driver’s alleged misuse of the vehicle and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed his request for …

Dinesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Paswan, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 24.9 litres of liquor recovered from a cowshed. He asserted that he has a clean criminal record, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and that the cowshed is a …

Lakshmi BabuversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lakshmi Babu, the owner of a motorcycle from which 13.875 litres of liquor was recovered, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he had no conscious possession of the liquor and was unaware that his vehicle would …

Tunni DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tunni Devi, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 16 litres of liquor from a sack near Chandni crossing. She asserted she had no possession of the liquor, the location did not belong to her, and she was implicated by a …

Pushpa DeviversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellants, Pushpa Devi and Anurag Kumar, were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant who claimed she was subjected to caste-based abuse after an …

IMTIYAZ AHMAD ALIAS RAJU PILOTversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Imtiyaz Ahmad alias Raju Pilot, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of the charge and discharge in a POCSO case alleging sexual assault of a minor. He contended that the FIR was delayed, the victim was over 18, and no evidence supported the charge. The …

Mithilesh Kumar ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mithilesh Kumar Manjhi, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession and that he was …

Subodh Sah @ SubodhversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners Subodh Sah, Santosh Sah and Sanjeev Kumar sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 240.63 litres of liquor from two autos. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught with the liquor, …

Ravi HembramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Hembram, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging that 180 litres of liquor and 12 kg of Naushadar tablets were recovered from his house, invoking Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he has a clean …

Athanni Chaudhary @ Birendra ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Athanni Chaudhary sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 75 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and was implicated solely on …

Md. Nasim @Md. Nasim NadafversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, comprising Md. Nasim and three women relatives, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (B.N.S.) alleging assault, robbery and other offences. They contended they have clean antecedents, were falsely …

Birendra Yadav @ Birendra Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four Yadavs from Satanpatti, were accused of multiple offences under the IPC, including assault and attempt to murder, arising from an incident where Birendra Yadav allegedly assaulted two individuals. They applied for anticipatory bail after the district court rejected their …

Manoj Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar Yadav was implicated in a case under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly transporting 228 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was …

Badri Rai @ Badri RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Badri Rai sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Excise Act, where liquor was allegedly recovered from other individuals. He argued he had no possession, a clean antecedent, and that the case relied on a confessional statement made in police …

Ramawatar ManjhiversusThe State Of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramawatar Manjhi sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (as amended in 2022) for allegedly possessing 50 litres of liquor recovered from his joint‑family house. He argued that he had no conscious possession, …

Munna KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Munna Kumar and Amarjeet Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a Santro. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, …

Uday MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Uday Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 57 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to him. He contended that he was not caught in possession, that the complaint was filed by a hostile …

Anil Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Anil Kumar Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 300 litres of liquor were recovered, was charged under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor, and that the driver …

Md. Sarafaraj @ Sarfaraj Ahmad @ Mo SarpharajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Md. Sarafaraj, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 18 litres of liquor recovered from his house, which is a joint family property. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious …

Santosh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 30.200 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was unaware that the vehicle was misused by …

Vikky KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vikky Kumar applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑harassment case (Section 498(a) IPC) arising from Complaint No. 519(c) of 2023. The prosecution alleged he assaulted the victim to demand dowry, while the petitioner claimed innocence. The State and the complainant opposed the bail. …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 56(2)(ii) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing three litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He argued he had no prior criminal record, was not the owner of the vehicle, and the …

Deepak KewatversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Deepak Kewat, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor from a public drain. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the location was public, and the complaint was …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from a motorcycle, asserting he was not caught in possession and was not the vehicle's owner. He claimed the case was initiated solely on the basis of a …

Md. Asgar Bawarchi @ Asgar BawarchiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Asgar Bawarchi, feared arrest in connection with PS Rampur Case No. 340 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (B.N.S.). The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim, causing injuries. The …

Sandip SafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sandip Safi, feared arrest in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 3062.52 litres of liquor from two Scorpio vehicles, although the liquor was not found in his possession and he is not the owner of the vehicles. He contended that his implication …

Ajay SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajay Sahni, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 46.24 litres of liquor from a bag that did not belong to him. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious possession, and the case relied …

Dhiraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dhiraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that liquor and a scooty were seized from another individual, Asharam Mandal, and that his implication rested solely on Asharam's confessional …

Domi Dharikar @ Domi DhanikarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Domi Dharikar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a location adjacent to his house. He argued he had a clean antecedent and that the alleged recovery was not from his possession, relying …

Mukesh Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar Yadav sought relief fearing arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He argued that he had no prior criminal record and that the liquor was not found in his possession, …

Md. Janhagir @ JanhagirversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Janhagir, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related complaint (Case No. 657 of 2019) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 314, 307, 379, 120B, 494 of the IPC and Section 3 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The prosecution claimed the petitioner participated in …

Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 40 litres of Jawa Mahua and 100 litres of raw Jawa. He argued that no contraband was seized from his possession, the alleged recovery occurred on public …

SANJU DEVIversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Sanju Devi sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5.25 litres of liquor from a public place. She contended that the liquor was not in her possession, that the recovery occurred at a location she …

Akhtar AliversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akhtar Ali, Arshad Ali and Md. Mushtakim, feared arrest in a criminal case (PS 1499/2024) alleging they denied a car park to an informant, with charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. They contended they were falsely implicated, asserting that the …

Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar SoniversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Akhtar Ali, Arshad Ali and Md. Mushtakim, feared arrest in a criminal case (PS 1499/2024) alleging they denied a car park to an informant, with charges under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. They contended they were falsely implicated, asserting that the …

Md. AshrafversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Md. Ashraf, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a complaint alleging assault, torture, and dowry demands under IPC sections 323, 341, 498(A) and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. Relying on the …

Sohail Azam @ Sohel Azam @ Michel Ansari @ Sohail AlamversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sohail Azam, was implicated in a 2017 FIR alleging participation in arson, looting and other offences under multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed innocence, arguing that the FIR contained only general and omnibus allegations without specific details of his …

Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioners, Nitish Kumar and Gautam Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a murder case (PS Case No. 306 of 2025) concerning the death of Aarti Kumari, alleged to have been killed and disguised as an accident. The prosecution alleges that the petitioners, along with others, …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, a group of twenty‑one residents of Gorgama village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Shahkund Police Station Case No. 108 of 2025, which alleged offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (B.N.S.) including arson, assault and …

Abhishek kushwaha @ Abhishek kumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Abhishek Kushwaha, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not found in his …

Sanjeeet Kumar ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjeeet Kumar Choudhary, sought anticipatory bail after the police alleged that 650 ml of liquor was recovered from a vehicle he owned, invoking Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was …

Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Prakash Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged ransom demands over telephone, alleged offences under Sections 140(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, arguing that the allegations stem from a business/monetary dispute and that a …

Kumari MamtaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Petitioner Kumari Mamta, a post office employee, feared arrest in a case (Guthni PS Case No. 309 of 2023) alleging embezzlement of Rs. 20,66,287 under Sections 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged she colluded with a co‑accused to misappropriate funds, while the petitioner …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry‑related case (PS 264/2024) where he is accused of assault and torture for dowry demand under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and the Dowry Prohibition Act. He pleaded innocence, claiming false …

Birendra PandeyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The appellant, Birendra Pandey, was charged under several provisions of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, the Arms Act and the SC/ST Act for allegedly attempting to forcibly take land belonging to the informant and for caste-based abuse. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting that he does …

Rajesh Ranjan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Rajesh Ranjan Singh was implicated in an excise case for alleged possession of 375 ml of liquor recovered from a scooty he owned, though the liquor was not found in his immediate possession and his friend Vijay was apprehended at the spot. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, arguing …

Sanichari DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Sanichari Devi, Sanjay Chaudhary and Pradeep Chaudhary, were named in an FIR for the murder of an informant's daughter, alleged to have occurred because of a suspicion of an illicit relationship and a demand for money. The petitioners contended that the FIR did not disclose any …

Ankit Singh @ Ankit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Ankit Singh was arrested in connection with a cyber‑offence (Sections 66(E), 67 and 67(B) of the Information Technology Act) for allegedly making a video of the informant’s daughter viral after befriending her on Instagram. The petition argued that the FIR did not allege any sexual harassment, none …

Ravi Kumar @ Ravi RajversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 108 litres of liquor from a vehicle. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, was not the owner of the …

Ajit @ Ajit Kumar Rai @ PepaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ajit Kumar Rai, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 17.28 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the vehicle's owner, and the case was based solely on a confessional …

Vikky SafiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikky Safi, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 3,062.52 litres of liquor from two vehicles. He contended that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicles, and was implicated solely on the testimony of a …

Shrawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Shrawan Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 552.960 litres of liquor from a bus. He contended that he was not apprehended at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the bus, arguing …

Ramu PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Ramu Prasad, the owner of a bus from which 552.960 litres of liquor were seized, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Excise Act, claiming he had no knowledge of the liquor and possessed a clean criminal record. The State opposed the bail, arguing that the …

Babul Singh @ Babul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Babul Singh and Suresh Mukhiya, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 43.5 litres of liquor from an auto. They argued they have clean antecedents, were not caught in possession, are not owners …

Bittu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Bittu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 24 litres of country-made liquor recovered from a joint family house. The prosecution’s case was based on a secret informant’s …

Rajesh ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Rajesh Choudhary, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, wherein 10 litres of country‑made Mahua liquor was recovered from his courtyard. He argued that the premises were open, not …

GurnekversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Gurnek, owner of an auto‑rickshaw, faced arrest in a case where 90 litres of illicit Nepali liquor were recovered from the vehicle. He contended that he merely rented the rickshaw to a driver, had no knowledge of the contraband, was not present at the scene, and possessed a clean …

Raju PrakashversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

Raju Prakash, the owner of a motorcycle from which 3.75 litres of illicit liquor was recovered, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR, was not present …

Chunnu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Chunnu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case involving 15 litres of illicit liquor recovered from his scooter, which was allegedly used by co‑accused Rahul Kumar. The prosecution alleged a violation of Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, …

Mani SinghversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Mani Singh, sought anticipatory bail after being named in an FIR for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, relating to the recovery of 243.360 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged that the liquor was seized from a field and that …

Kulwanti DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Kulwanti Devi was accused in a FIR for allegedly obtaining benefits under the Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana – Gramin by falsely claiming she owned no pucca house, despite possessing two, and for misappropriating Rs. 90,000 of government funds. The petition sought anticipatory bail, asserting she had …

Mithlesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail after 29.5 litres of illicit liquor were recovered from a motorcycle registered in his name. He claimed he was falsely implicated because the vehicle was parked in a public area and he had no involvement in liquor trade. The State opposed …

Chhotu @ Satish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Chhotu @ Satish Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 9 litres of illicit foreign liquor recovered from co‑accused Babloo Kumar. The petitioner argued that he was not named in the …

Rita DeviversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Rita Devi, a 56‑year‑old woman, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 30 litres of illicit Mahua liquor recovered from a pit behind a house she does not own. She contended that no contraband was found in her conscious …

Dheeraj Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar Sah, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor, with 69 litres of IMFL recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that his name appeared only because of a …

Jyoti KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Jyoti Kumari, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of foreign liquor. The prosecution recovered 20.640 litres of liquor from three women, including 6 litres allegedly linked to the petitioner, but …

Bindhyachal Gupta @ VInay Kumar GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Bindhyachal Gupta, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Complaint No. 494 of 2019, which alleged offences under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A and 34 for alleged dowry‑related assault. He claimed innocence and a clean record, while the State opposed bail. The Court, relying on the …

Manish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners—Manish Kumar, Vikash Kumar and Sandeep Kumar—sought bail in a criminal case (Sessions Trial No. 88 of 2024) arising from FIR No. 21 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307 and Arms Act section 27. They were summoned under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C. …

Vijay Kumar @ Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Vijay Kumar was named in an FIR for supplying spurious liquor that caused two deaths, alleged to have occurred on 29-10-2021. The petitioner contended that he was in judicial custody for a separate case (Kudhani PS Case No. 751 of 2021) from 10-10-2021, as evidenced by a bail order dated 22-12-2021. …

Ashutosh Kumar @ MantuversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ashutosh Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged illegal manufacturing and trading of illicit liquor under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018, with 225 litres of liquor reportedly recovered. The petitioner argued that the liquor was not seized from his …

Jishan Alam @ Md. Jishan Alam @ Md. JishanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Jishan Alam and Abu Sahma, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a police case (Simraha P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024) that alleged their involvement in assaults causing injuries to two victims, invoking several IPC offences …

Indal YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Indal Yadav and others, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for alleged assault on an informant. They contended that the FIR was lodged 15 days after the incident without any reasonable …

Bibi HazraversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Bibi Hazra, Md. Siraj Uddin and Md. Shohrab Raja, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a complaint (No. 264 of 2024) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 120(B), 504 and 506 for allegedly executing a forged sale deed. They contended that the matter was a civil …

Nagmani YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Nagmani Yadav, a daily‑wage labourer, feared arrest in a theft case (Govindpur PS Case No. 315 of 2025) involving alleged misappropriation of wheat and rice, alleged under Sections 305(e) and 334(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. The FIR does not name him, but his name appears in a …

Santosh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Yadav, a resident of Ballia, Uttar Pradesh, feared arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 1,486.56 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of …

Jagdev KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Jagdev Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after learning that he may be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41(I)(II) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,205 litres of liquor from a DCM truck. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, had no conscious possession …

Suman KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Suman Kumar, was arrested in a NDPS case (Sections 8(c) and 21(b)) after a raid recovered 7.91 grams of a substance alleged to be 'smack' along with phones and cash. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the seized material was never tested, that mandatory provisions of …

Rahul Kumar Jha @ Rahul JhaversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar Jha, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 1.5 litres of liquor in his vehicle. He argued that the liquor was hidden by his driver, that he was unaware of the misuse, and that nothing was recovered from his conscious …

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from an abandoned bag, which he claimed was not in his conscious possession. He argued that the investigation relied solely on secret information without proper …

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhotelal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chhotu Kumar and Bharat Kumar were charged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for assaulting an informant with the butt of a pistol and an iron rod, causing a grievous injury to the hand. The petitioners applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the injury was not to a …

Neeraj Ray @ Neeraj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Neeraj Ray, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 35 litres of liquor from a bush, though no liquor was found in his possession and the alleged site does not belong to him. He claimed a clean criminal record and argued that the …

Lalbabu Mahto @ Lal Babu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Lalbabu Mahto was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 2,205 litres of liquor from a truck. He has fifteen prior excise cases and claims he was not caught in possession nor is he the owner of the seized vehicle, asserting that …

Govind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Govind Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 5 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that the liquor was not found in his possession, that he was unaware his friend misused the vehicle, …

Kapal SahniversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, an 85‑year‑old man, was charged under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act for allegedly assaulting a man who later died. The prosecution alleged a scuffle that led to the death, but no specific allegation was made against the petitioner. The petitioner …

Rohit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 42 litres of liquor concealed near his relative's house. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the recovery site did not …

Sonu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 33.1 litres of liquor from a Toto rickshaw he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, …

Manoj SharmaversusThe State Of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, family members of the accused, were named in an FIR for alleged kidnapping of a 14‑year‑old girl under Sections 366A and 34 of the IPC. They contended that the primary allegation was against their relative Vikash Sharma and that the victim’s statement under Section 164 CrPC was …

Lala SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, Lala Sahni and Shankar Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 200 litres of liquor from a location not belonging to them. They argued they have a clean criminal …

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mukesh Kumar, the owner of a vehicle from which 625.86 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act. He argued that he was not present at the spot, the liquor was not in his conscious possession, and he was unaware that his driver …

Mananjay YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Mananjay Yadav was arrested on 13 October 2025 in connection with a case involving alleged assault on an informant’s family and offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated and that his …

Sudhir Sahni @ Sudhir Kumar SahniversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sudhir Sahni, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 30, 38(i), 38(ii) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly possessing 6.375 litres of liquor recovered from a kiosk not owned by him. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, …

Harendra SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Harendra Singh sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in Parsa Bazar Police Station Case No. 340 of 2025 for alleged assault under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (B.N.S.). The prosecution alleged that he threw a brick at an informant, injuring his face, and also …

Kamta SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kamta Sah, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 75 litres of liquor and a motorcycle. He asserted a clean criminal record and argued that the seized vehicle and liquor were not in his possession, …

Pratibha KumariversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pratibha Kumari, was implicated in a FIR (Bibhutipur PS Case No.119 of 2025) for allegedly submitting a forged BTET certificate to obtain a Panchayat Teacher appointment in 2014, invoking IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. She contended that the certificate was genuine, that …

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, seven residents of Madhobigha, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with a criminal case (PS No.416 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. They claimed the FIR was filed two days after a land‑dispute‑related scuffle …

Ranjit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ranjit Kumar Singh, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case (PS Case No. 975 of 2022) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to fraudulent sale deeds. The FIR alleged that co‑accused executed six sale deeds …

Chandan Yadav @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Chandan Yadav was arrested in connection with a case alleging assault, robbery and other offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that he, along with others, assaulted an informant for not performing an orchestra, causing only simple injuries. The petitioner …

Manoj KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Manoj Kumar, a senior bank assistant, was accused of fraudulent withdrawals totaling Rs.3,91,200 from the accounts of deceased customers, leading to a criminal case under Sections 318(4) and 316(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence and seeking …

Sawan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners Sawan Kumar, Sajan Kumar and Golu Kumar were implicated in a FIR alleging assault with intent to kill under several IPC sections and sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, arising from a land‑dispute scuffle. They claimed innocence, asserting the allegations were false and …

Naresh MandalversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Naresh Mandal applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where 138 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a mango orchard owned by Ramdas, a place unrelated to the petitioner. The petitioner argued that he was not caught in possession, …

Santosh ChoudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Santosh Choudhary sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, where he was alleged to be involved in the recovery of 37 litres of liquor and 1760 litres of semi‑manufactured liquor from a location not belonging to him. He argued that he was not …

Babloo KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Babloo Kumar, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging that 40 litres of liquor were recovered from his motorcycle. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was implicated merely because he owned the …

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Kumar HembramversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ranjeet Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning the alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a bicycle. He was not caught in possession and is not the owner of the bicycle; his implication rests on a confessional statement made by …

Anant Kumar @ Munna Singh @ Chandan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Anant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and (d) of the Bihar Excise Act concerning alleged recovery of 82 litres of liquor from a brewery. He argued that he was not caught in the act, no liquor was found in his possession, he was not named …

Sintu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sintu Kumar, was arrested on 20 November 2025 in connection with an assault on an informant using an iron rod, alleged under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, 2023. He sought bail, claiming a clean criminal record and that the incident arose from a petty …

Dheeraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Yadav @ Dheeraj YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 941 of 2024) under Sections 498A read with 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and others assaulted the victim to demand dowry. The petitioner claimed innocence and …

Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pappu Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Barh PS No.486 of 2023) involving offences under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 325, 307, 504 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused, including the petitioner, assaulted an informant and …

Neelam Kumari @ Nilam KumariversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Neelam Kumari, was named in an FIR for alleged forgery of an appointment letter related to a GNM post, invoking IPC sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471/34. She contended that she had no knowledge of the forged document and played no role in its creation. The State opposed her request …

Abul HasanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are close relatives of the husband of the informant, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a Mahila Police Station case alleging dowry‑related torture. The FIR charges them under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 85, 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS. The petitioners contended they …

Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Kumar @ Ajay PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Ajay Yadav, applied for pre‑arrest bail in PS‑Case No. 88 of 2025, which alleged assault, robbery and other offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 303(2) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was vague and …

Lalan MandalversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Lalan Mandal, applied for bail in a criminal case (Sono P.S. Case No. 231 of 2025) alleging sexual assault under Sections 331(4), 305, 64, 62 and 109 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner entered the informant’s house at night and …

Shivam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Shivam Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged possession of 32.5 litres of liquor and a motorcycle recovered from his uncle's premises. He argued he had a clean antecedent, was not caught with the liquor, did …

MANTOSH YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Mantosh Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 24.675 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not caught in possession, does not own the seized vehicle, …

RAVI YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a second bail application filed by Ravi Yadav under Section 483 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, seeking release pending trial in a case involving alleged arsenic poisoning. The applicant argued that the trial had been unduly delayed, that the charge sheet …

Brij Kishor Chaudhary @ Brajkishor ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Brij Kishor Chaudhary, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from premises adjacent to his shop. He argued that he was not arrested, no liquor was found in his possession, and the alleged recovery occurred on …

Rupan RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Rupan Ray, owner of a Mahindra pickup, was implicated in the seizure of 561.6 litres of liquor and faced arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that he had a clean criminal record, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of seizure, and was unaware …

Parmanand ThakurversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Parmanand Thakur, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 37(A) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of six litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, that the liquor was not in his conscious possession and that he was unaware …

Pawan Kumar SumanversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Suman, was facing arrest in a criminal case (Madhepura PS Case No. 482 of 2020) for alleged offences under Sections 419, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code relating to non‑deposit of Rs. 21,96,357. He had already paid Rs. 7,77,937 and was ready to furnish a demand draft …

Kanhaiya KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kanhaiya Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 305 and 331(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act, alleging theft from an informant's house. He contended that he was falsely implicated, not named in the FIR, and no stolen property was found in his …

Dinesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, Dinesh Yadav, Sitaram Yadav and Santun Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a criminal case (Shivaji Nagar PS Case No.50 of 2025) involving multiple offences under the B.N.S, 2023. The FIR alleges that they, armed, assaulted an informant and his uncle, causing …

Ganga YadavversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, Ganga Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a kidnapping case (IPC Sections 365 and 34) registered as Tarabari P.S. Case No. 63 of 2017. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the police investigation had exonerated him, submitting a final form which the lower …

Pappu RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioners, three brothers from Kushar village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272 and 273 and Bihar Excise Act Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) for allegedly recovering 10 litres of liquor and 1000 kg of mahua from a public bush. They argued they …

Sarwan Kumar @ Sharma KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Sarwan Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case alleging sexual assault (non‑penetrative) of a minor, the daughter of the informant, under Sections 126(2), 75(2), 352 of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The victim testified that …

Omprakash Sah @ Om Prakash SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Omprakash Sah, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging the recovery of 18.360 litres of liquor from a bag and a motorcycle. He asserted that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the seized …

Adarsh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Adarsh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he was part of an organized gang that extorted money from unemployed youth by promising fraudulent government jobs. The petitioner claimed he was falsely implicated, stating he was not seen in the viral video that identified the main …

Rama ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, four brothers from Bhawanibigha village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS Case No.136 of 2024) involving alleged assault under IPC sections 341, 323, and 308/34. The FIR alleged a collective assault on an informant during a land dispute but did not specifically …

Guddu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Guddu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging he was involved in the recovery of 35 litres of liquor from a motorcycle and one litre from a person named Md. Nausad. The petitioner argued he was not caught in the act, did …

Mahendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Mahendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for the alleged recovery of 18.75 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that the vehicle was …

Dinesh Chaudhary @ Pusha ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Dinesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail after learning that a case had been registered against him under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a public place. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found …

Tusi DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Tusi Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of liquor from her residence and from another individual. She argued that she had no conscious possession, the property was jointly owned, and that …

Ram Kumar KamtiversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioners, who are the father‑in‑law, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of a woman, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A, 504, 34, the Dowry Prohibition Act (ss.3,4) and the Bihar Excise Act (s.37). The FIR alleged that the victim’s …

Ibran AnsariversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Ibran Ansari, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 47 of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 21.06 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in actual possession of the liquor, and was unaware that …

Bedu Yadav @ Baiju YadavversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bedu Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after a case was registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 34 litres of liquor from his hut. He argued that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, the house is joint family property, and the 2018 …

Akash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Akash Kumar, a CISF personnel posted in Jharkhand, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 341, 323, 498A and 34. He is currently residing with his wife (OP No.2) and child at his matrimonial home in Rohtas, while his posting is elsewhere and he lacks …

Shambhu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

Shambhu Kumar was arrested in connection with a dowry harassment case (Lakhisarai Mahila P.S. Case No. 19 of 2025) alleging torture of the complainant for a demand of Rs. 5,00,000. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the FIR was false, delayed, and that the alleged dowry demand …

Rima Mukherjee @ Reema MukherjeeversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL REJECTED

The petitioner, Rima Mukherjee, was implicated in a fraud involving the alleged forgery of board resolutions and a power of attorney to facilitate the illegal acquisition of land valued at Rs. 100 crore. The prosecution alleges that she presented fabricated documents to the Bhagalpur Registry, …

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 6.9 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, that it was not in his conscious possession, and that he has a clean …

Nitish Kumar SahversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 126 litres of liquor from a motorcycle that he owned. He claimed the motorcycle had been stolen, a fact he reported to police on 23-02-2024, and argued that no liquor was …

Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Rai @ Suraj Kumar RaiversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Suraj Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), (b) and (c) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor and fermented jaggery from a public area not in his possession. He argued that the FIR lacked a proper informant, that the alleged …

Chhote PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Chhote Paswan sought anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 30(a), 32 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his joint family house and from another house. He argued that he was not apprehended on the spot, no liquor was found in his conscious …

Kundan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Kundan Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 29 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor at the time of arrest, and was unaware of any …

SANJAY PASWANversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Sanjay Paswan, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 666 litres of liquor from a Bolero vehicle he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the liquor, and was …

Gaytri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Gaytri Devi, sought anticipatory bail after a police case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act alleged that 4.32 litres of liquor were recovered from her joint family house and 360 ml from Anuj Kumar. The petitioner, a woman with one prior case, argued that she had no …

Bihari Kumar @ Amit KumarversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Bihari Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 111.6 litres of liquor from a public field. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, had a clean antecedent, and was implicated by a …

Biru Kumar @ Biru Yadav @ Akhilesh Rai @ Akhilesh RayversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

The petitioner, Biru Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging that the alleged 13.8 litres of liquor was recovered from a public place and not from his possession, and that the only evidence was a confessional …

Pawan Kumar Purve @ Pawan Kumar PurveyversusThe State of Bihar

BAIL GRANTED

The petitioner, Pawan Kumar Purve, was arrested in connection with a cyber‑PS case alleging forgery of fishing IDs, unlawful alteration of Aadhaar details and illegal collection of personal documents while operating a Common Service Center. He faced charges under several sections of the Bihar …

Pintu Paswan @ Raj Kishore PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

DISPOSED

Petitioner Pintu Paswan sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 30 litres of liquor and destruction of 1500 litres of semi‑fermented mahua. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent, argued that no arrest was made, …