Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petitioner, Surendra Kumar, was implicated in an excise case for alleged illegal manufacture and trade of illicit liquor after 405.360 litres of liquor were seized from a Mahindra CNG Magic Van he owned. He was not named in the FIR and argued that ownership of the vehicle did not prove his …
The petitioner, Sachin Kamat, was arrested in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016 after a vehicle was seized carrying 315 litres of illicit Nepali liquor. The police recovered the liquor from the vehicle, but the petitioner fled the scene and no …
Vidhi Singh, the owner of a truck from which 1 kg of doda was seized in Gaya, Bihar, applied for anticipatory bail under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged his involvement, while the petitioner claimed he was unaware of the drug being carried and that the vehicle …
Petitioner Pintu Kumar sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that 30.75 litres of liquor were recovered from a third‑party, Madan, and not from his own possession. He contended that the case against …
