Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
14 judgments · newest first · showing 1–14
The applicants Deepak Gupta and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 03‑04‑2026 and the cognizance order dated 16‑06‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 23077 of 2026, which arose from Crime No. 262 of 2025. The same dispute had earlier been …
The applicant, Deepak Mukherjee, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Settlement Scheme seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4157 of 2013) relating to offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 471 and 420. The parties had reached a compromise on 18 September 2025, …
The applicants Kishun Yadav and six others filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Settlement Scheme (BNSS) seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2260 of 2021 (State v. Kishan Yadav et al.) which involved offences under several IPC sections. Both parties had reconciled …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2009 of 2020) arising from offences under Sections 420, 406, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a voluntary compromise, which was verified by the Chief Judicial …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 32608 of 2014) instituted under IPC sections 406 and 420, on the ground that the parties had entered into a verified compromise dated 23 July 2025. Both the applicant’s counsel and the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case Crime No.248 of 2021) instituted under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The trial court, on a direction dated 02.02.2026, verified that the parties had reached a compromise, which was recorded …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 3905 of 2023, which involved offences under Sections 304A, 337 and 338 of the IPC. Earlier, a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application challenging the same order was dismissed, and the court permitted a fresh …
The petitioner, Arjun Chaupal, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑related assault case (PS Hasanpur Case No. 08 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 341, 342, 323, 506, 504, 498(A) and 34 IPC. The State opposed the bail application. Relying on the Supreme Court’s …
Sanit Sharma, the petitioner, feared arrest in a dowry harassment case (Complaint No. 738C of 2023) alleging violation of Sections 498A and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution alleged that he demanded dowry and tortured the informant, while the petitioner claimed innocence and noted that the co-accused, …
The petitioner, Arsad @ Ishad Ali, sought relief fearing arrest in a complaint (Case No. 807 of 2024) alleging assault for dowry demand under Section 498A IPC. The prosecution alleged the petitioner assaulted the informant, while the petitioner claimed innocence and that the parties had reached a …
The petitioners, members of the Mandal family, were charged in a 2021 case for kidnapping, attempted sexual assault, and related offences under several IPC sections. The alleged victim, the informant's daughter, recorded a statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. stating she was 18, voluntarily …
The petitioners, Sarita Devi and Rangila Kumar, mother‑in‑law and brother‑in‑law of the deceased, were implicated in a dowry‑death case (Shahkund P.S. Case No. 123 of 2024) under Sections 304B and 201 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for allegedly causing the death of the …
The petitioner, Ganesh Kumar, was named in an FIR (PS Dumariya Ghat Case No. 122 of 2024) for alleged offences including assault, dowry demand and attempted murder under Sections 341, 323, 342, 307, 498A, 504, 34, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He applied for bail, …
The petitioner, Md. Sajid Ansari, was named in a complaint (Case No. 190 of 2023) alleging cruelty under Section 498A of the IPC for non‑payment of a Rs. 5 lakh dowry demand. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the dispute had been resolved through mediation, resulting in a memorandum of …
