Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The petitioners, Manju Devi and Virendra Manjhi, were named in an FIR for kidnapping, attempted rape and related offences under Sections 363, 366A, 372/34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They contended that the principal charge of kidnapping and rape was directed at Mukesh Manjhi, and …
The petitioner, Chhathu Kumar, was implicated in a case (Sonepur P.S. Case No. 405 of 2026) for allegedly selling 15 litres of illicit liquor, an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for anticipatory bail, asserting his innocence and offering to donate Rs. …
The petitioner, Sahid Rehman @ Samu, was implicated in a case arising from a Durga immersion procession where stones were allegedly thrown, leading to charges under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code and Section 9 of the Bihar Control of Use and Play of Loudspeaker Act. He contended that he …
