Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioners Subodh Kumar, Raja Kumar and Dukhit Sahni applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act (BNS) 2023. They contend that the FIR contains specific allegations against other accused but only vague, omnibus …
The appellant, Tuntun Mahton, was charged under multiple sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act, 2023 and sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for allegedly assaulting an informant with a deadly weapon and stealing valuables. He appealed to …
The petitioner, Binod Yadav, was arrested in connection with a land‑related dispute in which he allegedly assaulted his brother with an iron rod, causing a grievous head injury. He is charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act, 2023. The …
Ankush Kumar and Ganesh Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case alleging assault and looting during a dispute over house construction. The informant claimed the petitioners attacked him with rods, causing injuries, and that a co‑accused used a pistol, while also alleging …
The petitioner, an 18‑year‑old with a clean record, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging multiple offences under the Bihar Non‑Specific Act, 2023. The FIR described a violent incident in which several accused, including the petitioner, were said to have assaulted …
The petitioner, Dharmavir Kumar, was arrested in connection with a land‑dispute‑related assault case (PS Case No. 333 of 2024) and charged under several sections of the Bihar Non‑Specific Act, 2023. He had previously applied for bail, which was denied on 22‑08‑2025. He filed a fresh application …
